From ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:27:49 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 6.6.15. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- include/net/dsa_stubs.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/net/dsa_stubs.h (limited to 'include/net/dsa_stubs.h') diff --git a/include/net/dsa_stubs.h b/include/net/dsa_stubs.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..361811750a --- /dev/null +++ b/include/net/dsa_stubs.h @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ +/* + * include/net/dsa_stubs.h - Stubs for the Distributed Switch Architecture framework + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA) + +extern const struct dsa_stubs *dsa_stubs; + +struct dsa_stubs { + int (*master_hwtstamp_validate)(struct net_device *dev, + const struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack); +}; + +static inline int dsa_master_hwtstamp_validate(struct net_device *dev, + const struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ + if (!netdev_uses_dsa(dev)) + return 0; + + /* rtnl_lock() is a sufficient guarantee, because as long as + * netdev_uses_dsa() returns true, the dsa_core module is still + * registered, and so, dsa_unregister_stubs() couldn't have run. + * For netdev_uses_dsa() to start returning false, it would imply that + * dsa_master_teardown() has executed, which requires rtnl_lock(). + */ + ASSERT_RTNL(); + + return dsa_stubs->master_hwtstamp_validate(dev, config, extack); +} + +#else + +static inline int dsa_master_hwtstamp_validate(struct net_device *dev, + const struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *config, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) +{ + return 0; +} + +#endif -- cgit v1.2.3