From 638a9e433ecd61e64761352dbec1fa4f5874c941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:18:06 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 6.10.3. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/memfd') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c index 93798c8c5d..dbc171a380 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) * then the kernel did a page-replacement or canceled the read() (or * whatever magic it did..). In that case, the memfd object is still * all zero. - * In case the memfd-object was *not* sealed, the read() was successfull + * In case the memfd-object was *not* sealed, the read() was successful * and the memfd object must *not* be all zero. * Note that in real scenarios, there might be a mixture of both, but * in this test-cases, we have explicit 200ms delays which should be diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 18f585684e..95af2d78fd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ static void test_share_open(char *banner, char *b_suffix) /* * Test sharing via fork() - * Test whether seal-modifications work as expected with forked childs. + * Test whether seal-modifications work as expected with forked children. */ static void test_share_fork(char *banner, char *b_suffix) { -- cgit v1.2.3