1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
===================================
File management in the Linux kernel
===================================
This document describes how locking for files (struct file)
and file descriptor table (struct files) works.
Up until 2.6.12, the file descriptor table has been protected
with a lock (files->file_lock) and reference count (files->count).
->file_lock protected accesses to all the file related fields
of the table. ->count was used for sharing the file descriptor
table between tasks cloned with CLONE_FILES flag. Typically
this would be the case for posix threads. As with the common
refcounting model in the kernel, the last task doing
a put_files_struct() frees the file descriptor (fd) table.
The files (struct file) themselves are protected using
reference count (->f_count).
In the new lock-free model of file descriptor management,
the reference counting is similar, but the locking is
based on RCU. The file descriptor table contains multiple
elements - the fd sets (open_fds and close_on_exec, the
array of file pointers, the sizes of the sets and the array
etc.). In order for the updates to appear atomic to
a lock-free reader, all the elements of the file descriptor
table are in a separate structure - struct fdtable.
files_struct contains a pointer to struct fdtable through
which the actual fd table is accessed. Initially the
fdtable is embedded in files_struct itself. On a subsequent
expansion of fdtable, a new fdtable structure is allocated
and files->fdtab points to the new structure. The fdtable
structure is freed with RCU and lock-free readers either
see the old fdtable or the new fdtable making the update
appear atomic. Here are the locking rules for
the fdtable structure -
1. All references to the fdtable must be done through
the files_fdtable() macro::
struct fdtable *fdt;
rcu_read_lock();
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
....
if (n <= fdt->max_fds)
....
...
rcu_read_unlock();
files_fdtable() uses rcu_dereference() macro which takes care of
the memory barrier requirements for lock-free dereference.
The fdtable pointer must be read within the read-side
critical section.
2. Reading of the fdtable as described above must be protected
by rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock().
3. For any update to the fd table, files->file_lock must
be held.
4. To look up the file structure given an fd, a reader
must use either lookup_fdget_rcu() or files_lookup_fdget_rcu() APIs. These
take care of barrier requirements due to lock-free lookup.
An example::
struct file *file;
rcu_read_lock();
file = lookup_fdget_rcu(fd);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (file) {
...
fput(file);
}
....
5. Since both fdtable and file structures can be looked up
lock-free, they must be installed using rcu_assign_pointer()
API. If they are looked up lock-free, rcu_dereference()
must be used. However it is advisable to use files_fdtable()
and lookup_fdget_rcu()/files_lookup_fdget_rcu() which take care of these
issues.
6. While updating, the fdtable pointer must be looked up while
holding files->file_lock. If ->file_lock is dropped, then
another thread expand the files thereby creating a new
fdtable and making the earlier fdtable pointer stale.
For example::
spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
fd = locate_fd(files, file, start);
if (fd >= 0) {
/* locate_fd() may have expanded fdtable, load the ptr */
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
__set_open_fd(fd, fdt);
__clear_close_on_exec(fd, fdt);
spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
.....
Since locate_fd() can drop ->file_lock (and reacquire ->file_lock),
the fdtable pointer (fdt) must be loaded after locate_fd().
On newer kernels rcu based file lookup has been switched to rely on
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU instead of call_rcu(). It isn't sufficient anymore
to just acquire a reference to the file in question under rcu using
atomic_long_inc_not_zero() since the file might have already been
recycled and someone else might have bumped the reference. In other
words, callers might see reference count bumps from newer users. For
this is reason it is necessary to verify that the pointer is the same
before and after the reference count increment. This pattern can be seen
in get_file_rcu() and __files_get_rcu().
In addition, it isn't possible to access or check fields in struct file
without first acquiring a reference on it under rcu lookup. Not doing
that was always very dodgy and it was only usable for non-pointer data
in struct file. With SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU it is necessary that callers
either first acquire a reference or they must hold the files_lock of the
fdtable.
|
