1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:22:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex specific scheduler helpers
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.6/older/patches-6.6.7-rt18.tar.xz
Have rt_mutex use the rt_mutex specific scheduler helpers to avoid
recursion vs rtlock on the PI state.
[[ peterz: adapted to new names ]]
Reported-by: Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230908162254.999499-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de
---
kernel/futex/pi.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 8 +++++++-
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex/pi.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
#include "futex.h"
@@ -1002,6 +1003,12 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, uns
goto no_block;
}
+ /*
+ * Must be done before we enqueue the waiter, here is unfortunately
+ * under the hb lock, but that *should* work because it does nothing.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
+
rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
/*
@@ -1052,6 +1059,10 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, uns
if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
ret = 0;
+ /*
+ * Waiter is unqueued.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_post_schedule();
no_block:
/*
* Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_blo
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, waiter, owner))
- schedule();
+ rt_mutex_schedule();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
set_current_state(state);
@@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_dead
WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
while (1) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule();
+ rt_mutex_schedule();
}
}
@@ -1757,6 +1757,15 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(str
int ret;
/*
+ * Do all pre-schedule work here, before we queue a waiter and invoke
+ * PI -- any such work that trips on rtlock (PREEMPT_RT spinlock) would
+ * otherwise recurse back into task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() through
+ * rtlock_slowlock() and will then enqueue a second waiter for this
+ * same task and things get really confusing real fast.
+ */
+ rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
+
+ /*
* Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can
* be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled
* (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the
@@ -1767,6 +1776,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(str
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ rt_mutex_post_schedule();
return ret;
}
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(st
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
int ret;
+ rwbase_pre_schedule();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
/*
@@ -125,6 +126,7 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(st
rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm);
trace_contention_end(rwb, ret);
+ rwbase_post_schedule();
return ret;
}
@@ -237,6 +239,8 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(str
/* Force readers into slow path */
atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers);
+ rwbase_pre_schedule();
+
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb))
goto out_unlock;
@@ -248,6 +252,7 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(str
if (rwbase_signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
rwbase_restore_current_state();
__rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, 0, flags);
+ rwbase_post_schedule();
trace_contention_end(rwb, -EINTR);
return -EINTR;
}
@@ -266,6 +271,7 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(str
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
+ rwbase_post_schedule();
return 0;
}
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -1427,8 +1427,14 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(str
#define rwbase_signal_pending_state(state, current) \
signal_pending_state(state, current)
+#define rwbase_pre_schedule() \
+ rt_mutex_pre_schedule()
+
#define rwbase_schedule() \
- schedule()
+ rt_mutex_schedule()
+
+#define rwbase_post_schedule() \
+ rt_mutex_post_schedule()
#include "rwbase_rt.c"
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -184,9 +184,13 @@ static __always_inline int rwbase_rtmut
#define rwbase_signal_pending_state(state, current) (0)
+#define rwbase_pre_schedule()
+
#define rwbase_schedule() \
schedule_rtlock()
+#define rwbase_post_schedule()
+
#include "rwbase_rt.c"
/*
* The common functions which get wrapped into the rwlock API.
|
