diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-15 19:37:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-15 19:37:10 +0000 |
commit | c9addba5cc770d2d231b34f6739f32c6be8690f1 (patch) | |
tree | c643da154a95a1d163137135050bb47858a1654e /gl/lib/strchrnul.c | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | man-db-c9addba5cc770d2d231b34f6739f32c6be8690f1.tar.xz man-db-c9addba5cc770d2d231b34f6739f32c6be8690f1.zip |
Adding upstream version 2.12.0.upstream/2.12.0
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'gl/lib/strchrnul.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gl/lib/strchrnul.c | 142 |
1 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gl/lib/strchrnul.c b/gl/lib/strchrnul.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8724427 --- /dev/null +++ b/gl/lib/strchrnul.c @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +/* Searching in a string. + Copyright (C) 2003, 2007-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as + published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the + License, or (at your option) any later version. + + This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License + along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ + +#include <config.h> + +/* Specification. */ +#include <string.h> + +/* Find the first occurrence of C in S or the final NUL byte. */ +char * +strchrnul (const char *s, int c_in) +{ + /* On 32-bit hardware, choosing longword to be a 32-bit unsigned + long instead of a 64-bit uintmax_t tends to give better + performance. On 64-bit hardware, unsigned long is generally 64 + bits already. Change this typedef to experiment with + performance. */ + typedef unsigned long int longword; + + const unsigned char *char_ptr; + const longword *longword_ptr; + longword repeated_one; + longword repeated_c; + unsigned char c; + + c = (unsigned char) c_in; + if (!c) + return rawmemchr (s, 0); + + /* Handle the first few bytes by reading one byte at a time. + Do this until CHAR_PTR is aligned on a longword boundary. */ + for (char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) s; + (size_t) char_ptr % sizeof (longword) != 0; + ++char_ptr) + if (!*char_ptr || *char_ptr == c) + return (char *) char_ptr; + + longword_ptr = (const longword *) char_ptr; + + /* All these elucidatory comments refer to 4-byte longwords, + but the theory applies equally well to any size longwords. */ + + /* Compute auxiliary longword values: + repeated_one is a value which has a 1 in every byte. + repeated_c has c in every byte. */ + repeated_one = 0x01010101; + repeated_c = c | (c << 8); + repeated_c |= repeated_c << 16; + if (0xffffffffU < (longword) -1) + { + repeated_one |= repeated_one << 31 << 1; + repeated_c |= repeated_c << 31 << 1; + if (8 < sizeof (longword)) + { + size_t i; + + for (i = 64; i < sizeof (longword) * 8; i *= 2) + { + repeated_one |= repeated_one << i; + repeated_c |= repeated_c << i; + } + } + } + + /* Instead of the traditional loop which tests each byte, we will + test a longword at a time. The tricky part is testing if *any of + the four* bytes in the longword in question are equal to NUL or + c. We first use an xor with repeated_c. This reduces the task + to testing whether *any of the four* bytes in longword1 or + longword2 is zero. + + Let's consider longword1. We compute tmp = + ((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1) & (repeated_one << 7). + That is, we perform the following operations: + 1. Subtract repeated_one. + 2. & ~longword1. + 3. & a mask consisting of 0x80 in every byte. + Consider what happens in each byte: + - If a byte of longword1 is zero, step 1 and 2 transform it into 0xff, + and step 3 transforms it into 0x80. A carry can also be propagated + to more significant bytes. + - If a byte of longword1 is nonzero, let its lowest 1 bit be at + position k (0 <= k <= 7); so the lowest k bits are 0. After step 1, + the byte ends in a single bit of value 0 and k bits of value 1. + After step 2, the result is just k bits of value 1: 2^k - 1. After + step 3, the result is 0. And no carry is produced. + So, if longword1 has only non-zero bytes, tmp is zero. + Whereas if longword1 has a zero byte, call j the position of the least + significant zero byte. Then the result has a zero at positions 0, ..., + j-1 and a 0x80 at position j. We cannot predict the result at the more + significant bytes (positions j+1..3), but it does not matter since we + already have a non-zero bit at position 8*j+7. + + The test whether any byte in longword1 or longword2 is zero is equivalent + to testing whether tmp1 is nonzero or tmp2 is nonzero. We can combine + this into a single test, whether (tmp1 | tmp2) is nonzero. + + This test can read more than one byte beyond the end of a string, + depending on where the terminating NUL is encountered. However, + this is considered safe since the initialization phase ensured + that the read will be aligned, therefore, the read will not cross + page boundaries and will not cause a fault. */ + + while (1) + { + longword longword1 = *longword_ptr ^ repeated_c; + longword longword2 = *longword_ptr; + + if (((((longword1 - repeated_one) & ~longword1) + | ((longword2 - repeated_one) & ~longword2)) + & (repeated_one << 7)) != 0) + break; + longword_ptr++; + } + + char_ptr = (const unsigned char *) longword_ptr; + + /* At this point, we know that one of the sizeof (longword) bytes + starting at char_ptr is == 0 or == c. On little-endian machines, + we could determine the first such byte without any further memory + accesses, just by looking at the tmp result from the last loop + iteration. But this does not work on big-endian machines. + Choose code that works in both cases. */ + + char_ptr = (unsigned char *) longword_ptr; + while (*char_ptr && (*char_ptr != c)) + char_ptr++; + return (char *) char_ptr; +} |