summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c')
-rw-r--r--gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c377
1 files changed, 377 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c b/gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7cbd7bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gl/lib/windows-rwlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
+/* Read-write locks (native Windows implementation).
+ Copyright (C) 2005-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
+ published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the
+ License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+/* Written by Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>, 2005.
+ Based on GCC's gthr-win32.h. */
+
+#include <config.h>
+
+/* Specification. */
+#include "windows-rwlock.h"
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+/* Don't assume that UNICODE is not defined. */
+#undef CreateEvent
+#define CreateEvent CreateEventA
+
+/* In this file, the waitqueues are implemented as circular arrays. */
+#define glwthread_waitqueue_t glwthread_carray_waitqueue_t
+
+static void
+glwthread_waitqueue_init (glwthread_waitqueue_t *wq)
+{
+ wq->array = NULL;
+ wq->count = 0;
+ wq->alloc = 0;
+ wq->offset = 0;
+}
+
+/* Enqueues the current thread, represented by an event, in a wait queue.
+ Returns INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE if an allocation failure occurs. */
+static HANDLE
+glwthread_waitqueue_add (glwthread_waitqueue_t *wq)
+{
+ HANDLE event;
+ unsigned int index;
+
+ if (wq->count == wq->alloc)
+ {
+ unsigned int new_alloc = 2 * wq->alloc + 1;
+ HANDLE *new_array =
+ (HANDLE *) realloc (wq->array, new_alloc * sizeof (HANDLE));
+ if (new_array == NULL)
+ /* No more memory. */
+ return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
+ /* Now is a good opportunity to rotate the array so that its contents
+ starts at offset 0. */
+ if (wq->offset > 0)
+ {
+ unsigned int old_count = wq->count;
+ unsigned int old_alloc = wq->alloc;
+ unsigned int old_offset = wq->offset;
+ unsigned int i;
+ if (old_offset + old_count > old_alloc)
+ {
+ unsigned int limit = old_offset + old_count - old_alloc;
+ for (i = 0; i < limit; i++)
+ new_array[old_alloc + i] = new_array[i];
+ }
+ for (i = 0; i < old_count; i++)
+ new_array[i] = new_array[old_offset + i];
+ wq->offset = 0;
+ }
+ wq->array = new_array;
+ wq->alloc = new_alloc;
+ }
+ /* Whether the created event is a manual-reset one or an auto-reset one,
+ does not matter, since we will wait on it only once. */
+ event = CreateEvent (NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL);
+ if (event == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
+ /* No way to allocate an event. */
+ return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
+ index = wq->offset + wq->count;
+ if (index >= wq->alloc)
+ index -= wq->alloc;
+ wq->array[index] = event;
+ wq->count++;
+ return event;
+}
+
+/* Notifies the first thread from a wait queue and dequeues it. */
+static void
+glwthread_waitqueue_notify_first (glwthread_waitqueue_t *wq)
+{
+ SetEvent (wq->array[wq->offset + 0]);
+ wq->offset++;
+ wq->count--;
+ if (wq->count == 0 || wq->offset == wq->alloc)
+ wq->offset = 0;
+}
+
+/* Notifies all threads from a wait queue and dequeues them all. */
+static void
+glwthread_waitqueue_notify_all (glwthread_waitqueue_t *wq)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < wq->count; i++)
+ {
+ unsigned int index = wq->offset + i;
+ if (index >= wq->alloc)
+ index -= wq->alloc;
+ SetEvent (wq->array[index]);
+ }
+ wq->count = 0;
+ wq->offset = 0;
+}
+
+void
+glwthread_rwlock_init (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ InitializeCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ glwthread_waitqueue_init (&lock->waiting_readers);
+ glwthread_waitqueue_init (&lock->waiting_writers);
+ lock->runcount = 0;
+ lock->guard.done = 1;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_rdlock (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ {
+ if (InterlockedIncrement (&lock->guard.started) == 0)
+ /* This thread is the first one to need this lock. Initialize it. */
+ glwthread_rwlock_init (lock);
+ else
+ {
+ /* Don't let lock->guard.started grow and wrap around. */
+ InterlockedDecrement (&lock->guard.started);
+ /* Yield the CPU while waiting for another thread to finish
+ initializing this lock. */
+ while (!lock->guard.done)
+ Sleep (0);
+ }
+ }
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Test whether only readers are currently running, and whether the runcount
+ field will not overflow, and whether no writer is waiting. The latter
+ condition is because POSIX recommends that "write locks shall take
+ precedence over read locks", to avoid "writer starvation". */
+ if (!(lock->runcount + 1 > 0 && lock->waiting_writers.count == 0))
+ {
+ /* This thread has to wait for a while. Enqueue it among the
+ waiting_readers. */
+ HANDLE event = glwthread_waitqueue_add (&lock->waiting_readers);
+ if (event != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
+ {
+ DWORD result;
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Wait until another thread signals this event. */
+ result = WaitForSingleObject (event, INFINITE);
+ if (result == WAIT_FAILED || result == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
+ abort ();
+ CloseHandle (event);
+ /* The thread which signalled the event already did the bookkeeping:
+ removed us from the waiting_readers, incremented lock->runcount. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount > 0))
+ abort ();
+ return 0;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Allocation failure. Weird. */
+ do
+ {
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ Sleep (1);
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ }
+ while (!(lock->runcount + 1 > 0));
+ }
+ }
+ lock->runcount++;
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_wrlock (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ {
+ if (InterlockedIncrement (&lock->guard.started) == 0)
+ /* This thread is the first one to need this lock. Initialize it. */
+ glwthread_rwlock_init (lock);
+ else
+ {
+ /* Don't let lock->guard.started grow and wrap around. */
+ InterlockedDecrement (&lock->guard.started);
+ /* Yield the CPU while waiting for another thread to finish
+ initializing this lock. */
+ while (!lock->guard.done)
+ Sleep (0);
+ }
+ }
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Test whether no readers or writers are currently running. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount == 0))
+ {
+ /* This thread has to wait for a while. Enqueue it among the
+ waiting_writers. */
+ HANDLE event = glwthread_waitqueue_add (&lock->waiting_writers);
+ if (event != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
+ {
+ DWORD result;
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Wait until another thread signals this event. */
+ result = WaitForSingleObject (event, INFINITE);
+ if (result == WAIT_FAILED || result == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
+ abort ();
+ CloseHandle (event);
+ /* The thread which signalled the event already did the bookkeeping:
+ removed us from the waiting_writers, set lock->runcount = -1. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount == -1))
+ abort ();
+ return 0;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Allocation failure. Weird. */
+ do
+ {
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ Sleep (1);
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ }
+ while (!(lock->runcount == 0));
+ }
+ }
+ lock->runcount--; /* runcount becomes -1 */
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_tryrdlock (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ {
+ if (InterlockedIncrement (&lock->guard.started) == 0)
+ /* This thread is the first one to need this lock. Initialize it. */
+ glwthread_rwlock_init (lock);
+ else
+ {
+ /* Don't let lock->guard.started grow and wrap around. */
+ InterlockedDecrement (&lock->guard.started);
+ /* Yield the CPU while waiting for another thread to finish
+ initializing this lock. */
+ while (!lock->guard.done)
+ Sleep (0);
+ }
+ }
+ /* It's OK to wait for this critical section, because it is never taken for a
+ long time. */
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Test whether only readers are currently running, and whether the runcount
+ field will not overflow, and whether no writer is waiting. The latter
+ condition is because POSIX recommends that "write locks shall take
+ precedence over read locks", to avoid "writer starvation". */
+ if (!(lock->runcount + 1 > 0 && lock->waiting_writers.count == 0))
+ {
+ /* This thread would have to wait for a while. Return instead. */
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return EBUSY;
+ }
+ lock->runcount++;
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_trywrlock (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ {
+ if (InterlockedIncrement (&lock->guard.started) == 0)
+ /* This thread is the first one to need this lock. Initialize it. */
+ glwthread_rwlock_init (lock);
+ else
+ {
+ /* Don't let lock->guard.started grow and wrap around. */
+ InterlockedDecrement (&lock->guard.started);
+ /* Yield the CPU while waiting for another thread to finish
+ initializing this lock. */
+ while (!lock->guard.done)
+ Sleep (0);
+ }
+ }
+ /* It's OK to wait for this critical section, because it is never taken for a
+ long time. */
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ /* Test whether no readers or writers are currently running. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount == 0))
+ {
+ /* This thread would have to wait for a while. Return instead. */
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return EBUSY;
+ }
+ lock->runcount--; /* runcount becomes -1 */
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_unlock (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ return EINVAL;
+ EnterCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ if (lock->runcount < 0)
+ {
+ /* Drop a writer lock. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount == -1))
+ abort ();
+ lock->runcount = 0;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Drop a reader lock. */
+ if (!(lock->runcount > 0))
+ {
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return EPERM;
+ }
+ lock->runcount--;
+ }
+ if (lock->runcount == 0)
+ {
+ /* POSIX recommends that "write locks shall take precedence over read
+ locks", to avoid "writer starvation". */
+ if (lock->waiting_writers.count > 0)
+ {
+ /* Wake up one of the waiting writers. */
+ lock->runcount--;
+ glwthread_waitqueue_notify_first (&lock->waiting_writers);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Wake up all waiting readers. */
+ lock->runcount += lock->waiting_readers.count;
+ glwthread_waitqueue_notify_all (&lock->waiting_readers);
+ }
+ }
+ LeaveCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+glwthread_rwlock_destroy (glwthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ if (!lock->guard.done)
+ return EINVAL;
+ if (lock->runcount != 0)
+ return EBUSY;
+ DeleteCriticalSection (&lock->lock);
+ if (lock->waiting_readers.array != NULL)
+ free (lock->waiting_readers.array);
+ if (lock->waiting_writers.array != NULL)
+ free (lock->waiting_writers.array);
+ lock->guard.done = 0;
+ return 0;
+}