path: root/upstream/debian-unstable/man1/perlsec.1

.\" -*- mode: troff; coding: utf-8 -*-
.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man 5.01 (Pod::Simple 3.43)
.\"
.\" Standard preamble:
.\" ========================================================================
.de Sp \" Vertical space (when we can't use .PP)
.if t .sp .5v
.if n .sp
..
.de Vb \" Begin verbatim text
.ft CW
.nf
.ne \\$1
..
.de Ve \" End verbatim text
.ft R
.fi
..
.\" \*(C` and \*(C' are quotes in nroff, nothing in troff, for use with C<>.
.ie n \{\
.    ds C` ""
.    ds C' ""
'br\}
.el\{\
.    ds C`
.    ds C'
'br\}
.\"
.\" Escape single quotes in literal strings from groff's Unicode transform.
.ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq
.el       .ds Aq '
.\"
.\" If the F register is >0, we'll generate index entries on stderr for
.\" titles (.TH), headers (.SH), subsections (.SS), items (.Ip), and index
.\" entries marked with X<> in POD.  Of course, you'll have to process the
.\" output yourself in some meaningful fashion.
.\"
.\" Avoid warning from groff about undefined register 'F'.
.de IX
..
.nr rF 0
.if \n(.g .if rF .nr rF 1
.if (\n(rF:(\n(.g==0)) \{\
.    if \nF \{\
.        de IX
.        tm Index:\\$1\t\\n%\t"\\$2"
..
.        if !\nF==2 \{\
.            nr % 0
.            nr F 2
.        \}
.    \}
.\}
.rr rF
.\" ========================================================================
.\"
.IX Title "PERLSEC 1"
.TH PERLSEC 1 2024-01-12 "perl v5.38.2" "Perl Programmers Reference Guide"
.\" For nroff, turn off justification.  Always turn off hyphenation; it makes
.\" way too many mistakes in technical documents.
.if n .ad l
.nh
.SH NAME
perlsec \- Perl security
.SH DESCRIPTION
.IX Header "DESCRIPTION"
Perl is designed to make it easy to program securely even when running
with extra privileges, like setuid or setgid programs.  Unlike most
command line shells, which are based on multiple substitution passes on
each line of the script, Perl uses a more conventional evaluation scheme
with fewer hidden snags.  Additionally, because the language has more
builtin functionality, it can rely less upon external (and possibly
untrustworthy) programs to accomplish its purposes.
.SH "SECURITY VULNERABILITY CONTACT INFORMATION"
.IX Header "SECURITY VULNERABILITY CONTACT INFORMATION"
If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in the Perl
interpreter or modules maintained in the core Perl codebase,
email the details to
perl\-security@perl.org <mailto:perl-security@perl.org>.
This address is a closed membership mailing list monitored by the Perl
security team.
.PP
See perlsecpolicy for additional information.
.SH "SECURITY MECHANISMS AND CONCERNS"
.IX Header "SECURITY MECHANISMS AND CONCERNS"
.SS "Taint mode"
.IX Subsection "Taint mode"
By default,
Perl automatically enables a set of special security checks, called \fItaint
mode\fR, when it detects its program running with differing real and effective
user or group IDs.  The setuid bit in Unix permissions is mode 04000, the
setgid bit mode 02000; either or both may be set.  You can also enable taint
mode explicitly by using the \fB\-T\fR command line flag.  This flag is
\&\fIstrongly\fR suggested for server programs and any program run on behalf of
someone else, such as a CGI script.  Once taint mode is on, it's on for
the remainder of your script.
.PP
While in this mode, Perl takes special precautions called \fItaint
checks\fR to prevent both obvious and subtle traps.  Some of these checks
are reasonably simple, such as verifying that path directories aren't
writable by others; careful programmers have always used checks like
these.  Other checks, however, are best supported by the language itself,
and it is these checks especially that contribute to making a set-id Perl
program more secure than the corresponding C program.
.PP
You may not use data derived from outside your program to affect
something else outside your program\-\-at least, not by accident.  All
command line arguments, environment variables, locale information (see
perllocale), results of certain system calls (\f(CWreaddir()\fR,
\&\f(CWreadlink()\fR, the variable of \f(CWshmread()\fR, the messages returned by
\&\f(CWmsgrcv()\fR, the password, gcos and shell fields returned by the
\&\f(CWgetpwxxx()\fR calls), and all file input are marked as "tainted".
Tainted data may not be used directly or indirectly in any command
that invokes a sub-shell, nor in any command that modifies files,
directories, or processes, \fBwith the following exceptions\fR:
.PP
Support for taint checks adds an overhead to all Perl programs,
whether or not you're using the taint features.
Perl 5.18 introduced C preprocessor symbols that can
be used to disable the taint features.
.IP \(bu 4
Arguments to \f(CW\*(C`print\*(C'\fR and \f(CW\*(C`syswrite\*(C'\fR are \fBnot\fR checked for taintedness.
.IP \(bu 4
Symbolic methods
.Sp
.Vb 1
\&    $obj\->$method(@args);
.Ve
.Sp
and symbolic sub references
.Sp
.Vb 2
\&    &{$foo}(@args);
\&    $foo\->(@args);
.Ve
.Sp
are not checked for taintedness.  This requires extra carefulness
unless you want external data to affect your control flow.  Unless
you carefully limit what these symbolic values are, people are able
to call functions \fBoutside\fR your Perl code, such as POSIX::system,
in which case they are able to run arbitrary external code.
.IP \(bu 4
Hash keys are \fBnever\fR tainted.
.PP
For efficiency reasons, Perl takes a conservative view of
whether data is tainted.  If an expression contains tainted data,
any subexpression may be considered tainted, even if the value
of the subexpression is not itself affected by the tainted data.
.PP
Because taintedness is associated with each scalar value, some
elements of an array or hash can be tainted and others not.
The keys of a hash are \fBnever\fR tainted.
.PP
For example:
.PP
.Vb 8
\&    $arg = shift;               # $arg is tainted
\&    $hid = $arg . \*(Aqbar\*(Aq;        # $hid is also tainted
\&    $line = <>;                 # Tainted
\&    $line = <STDIN>;            # Also tainted
\&    open FOO, "/home/me/bar" or die $!;
\&    $line = <FOO>;              # Still tainted
\&    $path = $ENV{\*(AqPATH\*(Aq};       # Tainted, but see below
\&    $data = \*(Aqabc\*(Aq;              # Not tainted
\&
\&    system "echo $arg";         # Insecure
\&    system "/bin/echo", $arg;   # Considered insecure
\&                                # (Perl doesn\*(Aqt know about /bin/echo)
\&    system "echo $hid";         # Insecure
\&    system "echo $data";        # Insecure until PATH set
\&
\&    $path = $ENV{\*(AqPATH\*(Aq};       # $path now tainted
\&
\&    $ENV{\*(AqPATH\*(Aq} = \*(Aq/bin:/usr/bin\*(Aq;
\&    delete @ENV{\*(AqIFS\*(Aq, \*(AqCDPATH\*(Aq, \*(AqENV\*(Aq, \*(AqBASH_ENV\*(Aq};
\&
\&    $path = $ENV{\*(AqPATH\*(Aq};       # $path now NOT tainted
\&    system "echo $data";        # Is secure now!
\&
\&    open(FOO, "< $arg");        # OK \- read\-only file
\&    open(FOO, "> $arg");        # Not OK \- trying to write
\&
\&    open(FOO,"echo $arg|");     # Not OK
\&    open(FOO,"\-|")
\&        or exec \*(Aqecho\*(Aq, $arg;   # Also not OK
\&
\&    $shout = \`echo $arg\`;       # Insecure, $shout now tainted
\&
\&    unlink $data, $arg;         # Insecure
\&    umask $arg;                 # Insecure
\&
\&    exec "echo $arg";           # Insecure
\&    exec "echo", $arg;          # Insecure
\&    exec "sh", \*(Aq\-c\*(Aq, $arg;      # Very insecure!
\&
\&    @files = <*.c>;             # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)
\&    @files = glob(\*(Aq*.c\*(Aq);       # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)
\&
\&    # In either case, the results of glob are tainted, since the list of
\&    # filenames comes from outside of the program.
\&
\&    $bad = ($arg, 23);          # $bad will be tainted
\&    $arg, \`true\`;               # Insecure (although it isn\*(Aqt really)
.Ve
.PP
If you try to do something insecure, you will get a fatal error saying
something like "Insecure dependency" or "Insecure \f(CW$ENV\fR{PATH}".
.PP
The exception to the principle of "one tainted value taints the whole
expression" is with the ternary conditional operator \f(CW\*(C`?:\*(C'\fR.  Since code
with a ternary conditional
.PP
.Vb 1
\&    $result = $tainted_value ? "Untainted" : "Also untainted";
.Ve
.PP
is effectively
.PP
.Vb 5
\&    if ( $tainted_value ) {
\&        $result = "Untainted";
\&    } else {
\&        $result = "Also untainted";
\&    }
.Ve
.PP
it doesn't make sense for \f(CW$result\fR to be tainted.
.SS "Laundering and Detecting Tainted Data"
.IX Subsection "Laundering and Detecting Tainted Data"
To test whether a variable contains tainted data, and whose use would
thus trigger an "Insecure dependency" message, you can use the
\&\f(CWtainted()\fR function of the Scalar::Util module, available in your
nearby CPAN mirror, and included in Perl starting from the release 5.8.0.
Or you may be able to use the following \f(CWis_tainted()\fR function.
.PP
.Vb 4
\&    sub is_tainted {
\&        local $@;   # Don\*(Aqt pollute caller\*(Aqs value.
\&        return ! eval { eval("#" . substr(join("", @_), 0, 0)); 1 };
\&    }
.Ve
.PP
This function makes use of the fact that the presence of tainted data
anywhere within an expression renders the entire expression tainted.  It
would be inefficient for every operator to test every argument for
taintedness.  Instead, the slightly more efficient and conservative
approach is used that if any tainted value has been accessed within the
same expression, the whole expression is considered tainted.
.PP
But testing for taintedness gets you only so far.  Sometimes you have just
to clear your data's taintedness.  Values may be untainted by using them
as keys in a hash; otherwise the only way to bypass the tainting
mechanism is by referencing subpatterns from a regular expression match.
Perl presumes that if you reference a substring using \f(CW$1\fR, \f(CW$2\fR, etc. in a
non-tainting pattern, that
you knew what you were doing when you wrote that pattern.  That means using
a bit of thought\-\-don't just blindly untaint anything, or you defeat the
entire mechanism.  It's better to verify that the variable has only good
characters (for certain values of "good") rather than checking whether it
has any bad characters.  That's because it's far too easy to miss bad
characters that you never thought of.
.PP
Here's a test to make sure that the data contains nothing but "word"
characters (alphabetics, numerics, and underscores), a hyphen, an at sign,
or a dot.
.PP
.Vb 5
\&    if ($data =~ /^([\-\e@\ew.]+)$/) {
\&        $data = $1;                     # $data now untainted
\&    } else {
\&        die "Bad data in \*(Aq$data\*(Aq";      # log this somewhere
\&    }
.Ve
.PP
This is fairly secure because \f(CW\*(C`/\ew+/\*(C'\fR doesn't normally match shell
metacharacters, nor are dot, dash, or at going to mean something special
to the shell.  Use of \f(CW\*(C`/.+/\*(C'\fR would have been insecure in theory because
it lets everything through, but Perl doesn't check for that.  The lesson
is that when untainting, you must be exceedingly careful with your patterns.
Laundering data using regular expression is the \fIonly\fR mechanism for
untainting dirty data, unless you use the strategy detailed below to fork
a child of lesser privilege.
.PP
The example does not untaint \f(CW$data\fR if \f(CW\*(C`use locale\*(C'\fR is in effect,
because the characters matched by \f(CW\*(C`\ew\*(C'\fR are determined by the locale.
Perl considers that locale definitions are untrustworthy because they
contain data from outside the program.  If you are writing a
locale-aware program, and want to launder data with a regular expression
containing \f(CW\*(C`\ew\*(C'\fR, put \f(CW\*(C`no locale\*(C'\fR ahead of the expression in the same
block.  See "SECURITY" in perllocale for further discussion and examples.
.SS "Switches On the ""#!"" Line"
.IX Subsection "Switches On the ""#!"" Line"
When you make a script executable, in order to make it usable as a
command, the system will pass switches to perl from the script's #!
line.  Perl checks that any command line switches given to a setuid
(or setgid) script actually match the ones set on the #! line.  Some
Unix and Unix-like environments impose a one-switch limit on the #!
line, so you may need to use something like \f(CW\*(C`\-wU\*(C'\fR instead of \f(CW\*(C`\-w \-U\*(C'\fR
under such systems.  (This issue should arise only in Unix or
Unix-like environments that support #! and setuid or setgid scripts.)
.ie n .SS "Taint mode and @INC"
.el .SS "Taint mode and \f(CW@INC\fP"
.IX Subsection "Taint mode and @INC"
+When the taint mode (\f(CW\*(C`\-T\*(C'\fR) is in effect, the environment variables
+\f(CW\*(C`PERL5LIB\*(C'\fR, \f(CW\*(C`PERLLIB\*(C'\fR, and \f(CW\*(C`PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC\*(C'\fR
are ignored by Perl.  You can still adjust \f(CW@INC\fR from outside the
program by using the \f(CW\*(C`\-I\*(C'\fR command line option as explained in
perlrun.  The two environment variables are
ignored because they are obscured, and a user running a program could
be unaware that they are set, whereas the \f(CW\*(C`\-I\*(C'\fR option is clearly
visible and therefore permitted.
.PP
Another way to modify \f(CW@INC\fR without modifying the program, is to use
the \f(CW\*(C`lib\*(C'\fR pragma, e.g.:
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  perl \-Mlib=/foo program
.Ve
.PP
The benefit of using \f(CW\*(C`\-Mlib=/foo\*(C'\fR over \f(CW\*(C`\-I/foo\*(C'\fR, is that the former
will automagically remove any duplicated directories, while the latter
will not.
.PP
Note that if a tainted string is added to \f(CW@INC\fR, the following
problem will be reported:
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  Insecure dependency in require while running with \-T switch
.Ve
.PP
On versions of Perl before 5.26, activating taint mode will also remove
the current directory (".") from the default value of \f(CW@INC\fR. Since
version 5.26, the current directory isn't included in \f(CW@INC\fR by
default.
.SS "Cleaning Up Your Path"
.IX Subsection "Cleaning Up Your Path"
For "Insecure \f(CW$ENV{PATH}\fR" messages, you need to set \f(CW$ENV{\*(AqPATH\*(Aq}\fR to
a known value, and each directory in the path must be absolute and
non-writable by others than its owner and group.  You may be surprised to
get this message even if the pathname to your executable is fully
qualified.  This is \fInot\fR generated because you didn't supply a full path
to the program; instead, it's generated because you never set your PATH
environment variable, or you didn't set it to something that was safe.
Because Perl can't guarantee that the executable in question isn't itself
going to turn around and execute some other program that is dependent on
your PATH, it makes sure you set the PATH.
.PP
The PATH isn't the only environment variable which can cause problems.
Because some shells may use the variables IFS, CDPATH, ENV, and
BASH_ENV, Perl checks that those are either empty or untainted when
starting subprocesses.  You may wish to add something like this to your
setid and taint-checking scripts.
.PP
.Vb 1
\&    delete @ENV{qw(IFS CDPATH ENV BASH_ENV)};   # Make %ENV safer
.Ve
.PP
It's also possible to get into trouble with other operations that don't
care whether they use tainted values.  Make judicious use of the file
tests in dealing with any user-supplied filenames.  When possible, do
opens and such \fBafter\fR properly dropping any special user (or group!)
privileges.  Perl doesn't prevent you from
opening tainted filenames for reading,
so be careful what you print out.  The tainting mechanism is intended to
prevent stupid mistakes, not to remove the need for thought.
.PP
Perl does not call the shell to expand wild cards when you pass \f(CW\*(C`system\*(C'\fR
and \f(CW\*(C`exec\*(C'\fR explicit parameter lists instead of strings with possible shell
wildcards in them.  Unfortunately, the \f(CW\*(C`open\*(C'\fR, \f(CW\*(C`glob\*(C'\fR, and
backtick functions provide no such alternate calling convention, so more
subterfuge will be required.
.PP
Perl provides a reasonably safe way to open a file or pipe from a setuid
or setgid program: just create a child process with reduced privilege who
does the dirty work for you.  First, fork a child using the special
\&\f(CW\*(C`open\*(C'\fR syntax that connects the parent and child by a pipe.  Now the
child resets its ID set and any other per-process attributes, like
environment variables, umasks, current working directories, back to the
originals or known safe values.  Then the child process, which no longer
has any special permissions, does the \f(CW\*(C`open\*(C'\fR or other system call.
Finally, the child passes the data it managed to access back to the
parent.  Because the file or pipe was opened in the child while running
under less privilege than the parent, it's not apt to be tricked into
doing something it shouldn't.
.PP
Here's a way to do backticks reasonably safely.  Notice how the \f(CW\*(C`exec\*(C'\fR is
not called with a string that the shell could expand.  This is by far the
best way to call something that might be subjected to shell escapes: just
never call the shell at all.
.PP
.Vb 10
\&        use English;
\&        die "Can\*(Aqt fork: $!" unless defined($pid = open(KID, "\-|"));
\&        if ($pid) {           # parent
\&            while (<KID>) {
\&                # do something
\&            }
\&            close KID;
\&        } else {
\&            my @temp     = ($EUID, $EGID);
\&            my $orig_uid = $UID;
\&            my $orig_gid = $GID;
\&            $EUID = $UID;
\&            $EGID = $GID;
\&            # Drop privileges
\&            $UID  = $orig_uid;
\&            $GID  = $orig_gid;
\&            # Make sure privs are really gone
\&            ($EUID, $EGID) = @temp;
\&            die "Can\*(Aqt drop privileges"
\&                unless $UID == $EUID  && $GID eq $EGID;
\&            $ENV{PATH} = "/bin:/usr/bin"; # Minimal PATH.
\&            # Consider sanitizing the environment even more.
\&            exec \*(Aqmyprog\*(Aq, \*(Aqarg1\*(Aq, \*(Aqarg2\*(Aq
\&                or die "can\*(Aqt exec myprog: $!";
\&        }
.Ve
.PP
A similar strategy would work for wildcard expansion via \f(CW\*(C`glob\*(C'\fR, although
you can use \f(CW\*(C`readdir\*(C'\fR instead.
.PP
Taint checking is most useful when although you trust yourself not to have
written a program to give away the farm, you don't necessarily trust those
who end up using it not to try to trick it into doing something bad.  This
is the kind of security checking that's useful for set-id programs and
programs launched on someone else's behalf, like CGI programs.
.PP
This is quite different, however, from not even trusting the writer of the
code not to try to do something evil.  That's the kind of trust needed
when someone hands you a program you've never seen before and says, "Here,
run this."  For that kind of safety, you might want to check out the Safe
module, included standard in the Perl distribution.  This module allows the
programmer to set up special compartments in which all system operations
are trapped and namespace access is carefully controlled.  Safe should
not be considered bullet-proof, though: it will not prevent the foreign
code to set up infinite loops, allocate gigabytes of memory, or even
abusing perl bugs to make the host interpreter crash or behave in
unpredictable ways.  In any case it's better avoided completely if you're
really concerned about security.
.SS "Shebang Race Condition"
.IX Subsection "Shebang Race Condition"
Beyond the obvious problems that stem from giving special privileges to
systems as flexible as scripts, on many versions of Unix, set-id scripts
are inherently insecure right from the start.  The problem is a race
condition in the kernel.  Between the time the kernel opens the file to
see which interpreter to run and when the (now-set-id) interpreter turns
around and reopens the file to interpret it, the file in question may have
changed, especially if you have symbolic links on your system.
.PP
Some Unixes, especially more recent ones, are free of this
inherent security bug.  On such systems, when the kernel passes the name
of the set-id script to open to the interpreter, rather than using a
pathname subject to meddling, it instead passes \fI/dev/fd/3\fR.  This is a
special file already opened on the script, so that there can be no race
condition for evil scripts to exploit.  On these systems, Perl should be
compiled with \f(CW\*(C`\-DSETUID_SCRIPTS_ARE_SECURE_NOW\*(C'\fR.  The \fIConfigure\fR
program that builds Perl tries to figure this out for itself, so you
should never have to specify this yourself.  Most modern releases of
SysVr4 and BSD 4.4 use this approach to avoid the kernel race condition.
.PP
If you don't have the safe version of set-id scripts, all is not lost.
Sometimes this kernel "feature" can be disabled, so that the kernel
either doesn't run set-id scripts with the set-id or doesn't run them
at all.  Either way avoids the exploitability of the race condition,
but doesn't help in actually running scripts set-id.
.PP
If the kernel set-id script feature isn't disabled, then any set-id
script provides an exploitable vulnerability.  Perl can't avoid being
exploitable, but will point out vulnerable scripts where it can.  If Perl
detects that it is being applied to a set-id script then it will complain
loudly that your set-id script is insecure, and won't run it.  When Perl
complains, you need to remove the set-id bit from the script to eliminate
the vulnerability.  Refusing to run the script doesn't in itself close
the vulnerability; it is just Perl's way of encouraging you to do this.
.PP
To actually run a script set-id, if you don't have the safe version of
set-id scripts, you'll need to put a C wrapper around
the script.  A C wrapper is just a compiled program that does nothing
except call your Perl program.   Compiled programs are not subject to the
kernel bug that plagues set-id scripts.  Here's a simple wrapper, written
in C:
.PP
.Vb 4
\&    #include <unistd.h>
\&    #include <stdio.h>
\&    #include <string.h>
\&    #include <errno.h>
\&
\&    #define REAL_PATH "/path/to/script"
\&
\&    int main(int argc, char **argv)
\&    {
\&        execv(REAL_PATH, argv);
\&        fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\en",
\&                        argv[0], REAL_PATH, strerror(errno));
\&        return 127;
\&    }
.Ve
.PP
Compile this wrapper into a binary executable and then make \fIit\fR rather
than your script setuid or setgid.  Note that this wrapper isn't doing
anything to sanitise the execution environment other than ensuring
that a safe path to the script is used.  It only avoids the shebang
race condition.  It relies on Perl's own features, and on the script
itself being careful, to make it safe enough to run the script set-id.
.SS "Protecting Your Programs"
.IX Subsection "Protecting Your Programs"
There are a number of ways to hide the source to your Perl programs,
with varying levels of "security".
.PP
First of all, however, you \fIcan't\fR take away read permission, because
the source code has to be readable in order to be compiled and
interpreted.  (That doesn't mean that a CGI script's source is
readable by people on the web, though.)  So you have to leave the
permissions at the socially friendly 0755 level.  This lets 
people on your local system only see your source.
.PP
Some people mistakenly regard this as a security problem.  If your program does
insecure things, and relies on people not knowing how to exploit those
insecurities, it is not secure.  It is often possible for someone to
determine the insecure things and exploit them without viewing the
source.  Security through obscurity, the name for hiding your bugs
instead of fixing them, is little security indeed.
.PP
You can try using encryption via source filters (Filter::* from CPAN,
or Filter::Util::Call and Filter::Simple since Perl 5.8).
But crackers might be able to decrypt it.  You can try using the byte
code compiler and interpreter described below, but crackers might be
able to de-compile it.  You can try using the native-code compiler
described below, but crackers might be able to disassemble it.  These
pose varying degrees of difficulty to people wanting to get at your
code, but none can definitively conceal it (this is true of every
language, not just Perl).
.PP
If you're concerned about people profiting from your code, then the
bottom line is that nothing but a restrictive license will give you
legal security.  License your software and pepper it with threatening
statements like "This is unpublished proprietary software of XYZ Corp.
Your access to it does not give you permission to use it blah blah
blah."  You should see a lawyer to be sure your license's wording will
stand up in court.
.SS Unicode
.IX Subsection "Unicode"
Unicode is a new and complex technology and one may easily overlook
certain security pitfalls.  See perluniintro for an overview and
perlunicode for details, and "Security Implications
of Unicode" in perlunicode for security implications in particular.
.SS "Algorithmic Complexity Attacks"
.IX Subsection "Algorithmic Complexity Attacks"
Certain internal algorithms used in the implementation of Perl can
be attacked by choosing the input carefully to consume large amounts
of either time or space or both.  This can lead into the so-called
\&\fIDenial of Service\fR (DoS) attacks.
.IP \(bu 4
Hash Algorithm \- Hash algorithms like the one used in Perl are well
known to be vulnerable to collision attacks on their hash function.
Such attacks involve constructing a set of keys which collide into
the same bucket producing inefficient behavior.  Such attacks often
depend on discovering the seed of the hash function used to map the
keys to buckets.  That seed is then used to brute-force a key set which
can be used to mount a denial of service attack.  In Perl 5.8.1 changes
were introduced to harden Perl to such attacks, and then later in
Perl 5.18.0 these features were enhanced and additional protections
added.
.Sp
At the time of this writing, Perl 5.18.0 is considered to be
well-hardened against algorithmic complexity attacks on its hash
implementation.  This is largely owed to the following measures
mitigate attacks:
.RS 4
.IP "Hash Seed Randomization" 4
.IX Item "Hash Seed Randomization"
In order to make it impossible to know what seed to generate an attack
key set for, this seed is randomly initialized at process start.  This
may be overridden by using the PERL_HASH_SEED environment variable, see
"PERL_HASH_SEED" in perlrun.  This environment variable controls how
items are actually stored, not how they are presented via
\&\f(CW\*(C`keys\*(C'\fR, \f(CW\*(C`values\*(C'\fR and \f(CW\*(C`each\*(C'\fR.
.IP "Hash Traversal Randomization" 4
.IX Item "Hash Traversal Randomization"
Independent of which seed is used in the hash function, \f(CW\*(C`keys\*(C'\fR,
\&\f(CW\*(C`values\*(C'\fR, and \f(CW\*(C`each\*(C'\fR return items in a per-hash randomized order.
Modifying a hash by insertion will change the iteration order of that hash.
This behavior can be overridden by using \f(CWhash_traversal_mask()\fR from
Hash::Util or by using the PERL_PERTURB_KEYS environment variable,
see "PERL_PERTURB_KEYS" in perlrun.  Note that this feature controls the
"visible" order of the keys, and not the actual order they are stored in.
.IP "Bucket Order Perturbance" 4
.IX Item "Bucket Order Perturbance"
When items collide into a given hash bucket the order they are stored in
the chain is no longer predictable in Perl 5.18.  This
has the intention to make it harder to observe a
collision.  This behavior can be overridden by using
the PERL_PERTURB_KEYS environment variable, see "PERL_PERTURB_KEYS" in perlrun.
.IP "New Default Hash Function" 4
.IX Item "New Default Hash Function"
The default hash function has been modified with the intention of making
it harder to infer the hash seed.
.IP "Alternative Hash Functions" 4
.IX Item "Alternative Hash Functions"
The source code includes multiple hash algorithms to choose from.  While we
believe that the default perl hash is robust to attack, we have included the
hash function Siphash as a fall-back option.  At the time of release of
Perl 5.18.0 Siphash is believed to be of cryptographic strength.  This is
not the default as it is much slower than the default hash.
.RE
.RS 4
.Sp
Without compiling a special Perl, there is no way to get the exact same
behavior of any versions prior to Perl 5.18.0.  The closest one can get
is by setting PERL_PERTURB_KEYS to 0 and setting the PERL_HASH_SEED
to a known value.  We do not advise those settings for production use
due to the above security considerations.
.Sp
\&\fBPerl has never guaranteed any ordering of the hash keys\fR, and
the ordering has already changed several times during the lifetime of
Perl 5.  Also, the ordering of hash keys has always been, and continues
to be, affected by the insertion order and the history of changes made
to the hash over its lifetime.
.Sp
Also note that while the order of the hash elements might be
randomized, this "pseudo-ordering" should \fBnot\fR be used for
applications like shuffling a list randomly (use \f(CWList::Util::shuffle()\fR
for that, see List::Util, a standard core module since Perl 5.8.0;
or the CPAN module \f(CW\*(C`Algorithm::Numerical::Shuffle\*(C'\fR), or for generating
permutations (use e.g. the CPAN modules \f(CW\*(C`Algorithm::Permute\*(C'\fR or
\&\f(CW\*(C`Algorithm::FastPermute\*(C'\fR), or for any cryptographic applications.
.Sp
Tied hashes may have their own ordering and algorithmic complexity
attacks.
.RE
.IP \(bu 4
Regular expressions \- Perl's regular expression engine is so called NFA
(Non-deterministic Finite Automaton), which among other things means that
it can rather easily consume large amounts of both time and space if the
regular expression may match in several ways.  Careful crafting of the
regular expressions can help but quite often there really isn't much
one can do (the book "Mastering Regular Expressions" is required
reading, see perlfaq2).  Running out of space manifests itself by
Perl running out of memory.
.IP \(bu 4
Sorting \- the quicksort algorithm used in Perls before 5.8.0 to
implement the \fBsort()\fR function was very easy to trick into misbehaving
so that it consumes a lot of time.  Starting from Perl 5.8.0 a different
sorting algorithm, mergesort, is used by default.  Mergesort cannot
misbehave on any input.
.PP
See <https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec03/tech/full_papers/crosby/crosby.pdf> for more information,
and any computer science textbook on algorithmic complexity.
.SS "Using Sudo"
.IX Subsection "Using Sudo"
The popular tool \f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR provides a controlled way for users to be able
to run programs as other users.  It sanitises the execution environment
to some extent, and will avoid the shebang race condition.  If you don't have the safe version of set-id scripts,
then \f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR may be a more convenient way of executing a script as
another user than writing a C wrapper would be.
.PP
However, \f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR sets the real user or group ID to that of the target
identity, not just the effective ID as set-id bits do.  As a result, Perl
can't detect that it is running under \f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR, and so won't automatically
take its own security precautions such as turning on taint mode.  Where
\&\f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR configuration dictates exactly which command can be run, the
approved command may include a \f(CW\*(C`\-T\*(C'\fR option to perl to enable taint mode.
.PP
In general, it is necessary to evaluate the suitability of a script to
run under \f(CW\*(C`sudo\*(C'\fR specifically with that kind of execution environment
in mind.  It is neither necessary nor sufficient for the same script to
be suitable to run in a traditional set-id arrangement, though many of
the issues overlap.
.SH "SEE ALSO"
.IX Header "SEE ALSO"
"ENVIRONMENT" in perlrun for its description of cleaning up environment
variables.