From b527294153be3b79563c82c66102adc0004736c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:54:12 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 2.6.7+dfsg. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- servers/slapd/filterentry.c | 986 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 986 insertions(+) create mode 100644 servers/slapd/filterentry.c (limited to 'servers/slapd/filterentry.c') diff --git a/servers/slapd/filterentry.c b/servers/slapd/filterentry.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61b64ff --- /dev/null +++ b/servers/slapd/filterentry.c @@ -0,0 +1,986 @@ +/* filterentry.c - apply a filter to an entry */ +/* $OpenLDAP$ */ +/* This work is part of OpenLDAP Software . + * + * Copyright 1998-2022 The OpenLDAP Foundation. + * All rights reserved. + * + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without + * modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP + * Public License. + * + * A copy of this license is available in the file LICENSE in the + * top-level directory of the distribution or, alternatively, at + * . + */ +/* Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Regents of the University of Michigan. + * All rights reserved. + * + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted + * provided that this notice is preserved and that due credit is given + * to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. The name of the University + * may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this + * software without specific prior written permission. This software + * is provided ``as is'' without express or implied warranty. + */ + +#include "portable.h" + +#include + +#include +#include + +#include "slap.h" + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH +#include "component.h" +#endif + +static int test_filter_and( Operation *op, Entry *e, Filter *flist ); +static int test_filter_or( Operation *op, Entry *e, Filter *flist ); +static int test_substrings_filter( Operation *op, Entry *e, Filter *f); +static int test_ava_filter( Operation *op, + Entry *e, AttributeAssertion *ava, int type ); +static int test_mra_filter( Operation *op, + Entry *e, MatchingRuleAssertion *mra ); +static int test_presence_filter( Operation *op, + Entry *e, AttributeDescription *desc ); + + +/* + * test_filter - test a filter against a single entry. + * returns: + * LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE filter matched + * LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE filter did not match + * SLAPD_COMPARE_UNDEFINED filter is undefined + * or an ldap result code indicating error + */ + +int +test_filter( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + Filter *f ) +{ + int rc; + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "=> test_filter\n" ); + + if ( f->f_choice & SLAPD_FILTER_UNDEFINED ) { + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " UNDEFINED\n" ); + rc = SLAPD_COMPARE_UNDEFINED; + goto out; + } + + switch ( f->f_choice ) { + case SLAPD_FILTER_COMPUTED: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " COMPUTED %s (%d)\n", + f->f_result == LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE ? "false" : + f->f_result == LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE ? "true" : + f->f_result == SLAPD_COMPARE_UNDEFINED ? "undefined" : "error", + f->f_result ); + + rc = f->f_result; + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " EQUALITY\n" ); + rc = test_ava_filter( op, e, f->f_ava, LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_SUBSTRINGS: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " SUBSTRINGS\n" ); + rc = test_substrings_filter( op, e, f ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_GE: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " GE\n" ); + rc = test_ava_filter( op, e, f->f_ava, LDAP_FILTER_GE ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_LE: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " LE\n" ); + rc = test_ava_filter( op, e, f->f_ava, LDAP_FILTER_LE ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_PRESENT: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " PRESENT\n" ); + rc = test_presence_filter( op, e, f->f_desc ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_APPROX: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " APPROX\n" ); + rc = test_ava_filter( op, e, f->f_ava, LDAP_FILTER_APPROX ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_AND: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " AND\n" ); + rc = test_filter_and( op, e, f->f_and ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_OR: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " OR\n" ); + rc = test_filter_or( op, e, f->f_or ); + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_NOT: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " NOT\n" ); + rc = test_filter( op, e, f->f_not ); + + /* Flip true to false and false to true + * but leave Undefined alone. + */ + switch( rc ) { + case LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE: + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + break; + case LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE: + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + } + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_EXT: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, " EXT\n" ); + rc = test_mra_filter( op, e, f->f_mra ); + break; + + default: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_ANY, " unknown filter type %lu\n", + f->f_choice ); + rc = LDAP_PROTOCOL_ERROR; + } +out: + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "<= test_filter %d\n", rc ); + return( rc ); +} + +static int test_mra_filter( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + MatchingRuleAssertion *mra ) +{ + Attribute *a; + void *memctx; + BER_MEMFREE_FN *memfree; +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + int i, num_attr_vals = 0; +#endif + + if ( op == NULL ) { + memctx = NULL; + memfree = slap_sl_mfuncs.bmf_free; + } else { + memctx = op->o_tmpmemctx; + memfree = op->o_tmpfree; + } + + if ( mra->ma_desc ) { + /* + * if ma_desc is available, then we're filtering for + * one attribute, and SEARCH permissions can be checked + * directly. + */ + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, + mra->ma_desc, &mra->ma_value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) + { + return LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + } + + if ( mra->ma_desc == slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN ) { + int ret, rc; + const char *text; + + rc = value_match( &ret, slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_EXT, &e->e_nname, &mra->ma_value, &text ); + + + if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc; + if ( ret == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + } + + for ( a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, mra->ma_desc ); + a != NULL; + a = attrs_find( a->a_next, mra->ma_desc ) ) + { + struct berval *bv; + int normalize_attribute = 0; + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + /* Component Matching */ + if ( mra->ma_cf && mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) { + num_attr_vals = 0; + if ( !a->a_comp_data ) { + num_attr_vals = a->a_numvals; + if ( num_attr_vals <= 0 ) { + /* no attribute value */ + return LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + } + num_attr_vals++; + + /* following malloced will be freed by comp_tree_free () */ + a->a_comp_data = SLAP_MALLOC( sizeof( ComponentData ) + + sizeof( ComponentSyntaxInfo* )*num_attr_vals ); + + if ( !a->a_comp_data ) return LDAP_NO_MEMORY; + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree = (ComponentSyntaxInfo**) + ((char*)a->a_comp_data + sizeof(ComponentData)); + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[num_attr_vals - 1] = + (ComponentSyntaxInfo*) NULL; + a->a_comp_data->cd_mem_op = + nibble_mem_allocator( 1024*16, 1024 ); + } + } +#endif + + /* If ma_rule is not the same as the attribute's + * normal rule, then we can't use the a_nvals. + */ + if ( mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality ) { + bv = a->a_nvals; + + } else { + bv = a->a_vals; + normalize_attribute = 1; + } +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + i = 0; +#endif + for ( ; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) { + int ret; + int rc; + const char *text; + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + if ( mra->ma_cf && + mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) + { + /* Check if decoded component trees are already linked */ + if ( num_attr_vals ) { + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] = attr_converter( + a, a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_syntax, bv ); + } + /* decoding error */ + if ( !a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] ) { + return LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_COMPONENT, + (struct berval*)a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i++], + (void*)mra, &text ); + } else +#endif + { + struct berval nbv = BER_BVNULL; + + if ( normalize_attribute && mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) { + /* + + Document: RFC 4511 + + 4.5.1. Search Request + ... + If the type field is present and the matchingRule is present, + the matchValue is compared against entry attributes of the + specified type. In this case, the matchingRule MUST be one + suitable for use with the specified type (see [RFC4517]), + otherwise the filter item is Undefined. + + + In this case, since the matchingRule requires the assertion + value to be normalized, we normalize the attribute value + according to the syntax of the matchingRule. + + This should likely be done inside value_match(), by passing + the appropriate flags, but this is not done at present. + See ITS#3406. + */ + if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize( + SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX, + mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax, + mra->ma_rule, + bv, &nbv, memctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS ) + { + /* FIXME: stop processing? */ + continue; + } + + } else { + nbv = *bv; + } + + rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_EXT, &nbv, &mra->ma_value, &text ); + + if ( nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) { + memfree( nbv.bv_val, memctx ); + } + } + + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc; + if ( ret == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + } + } + + } else { + /* + * No attribute description: test all + */ + for ( a = e->e_attrs; a != NULL; a = a->a_next ) { + struct berval *bv, value; + const char *text = NULL; + int rc; + int normalize_attribute = 0; + + /* check if matching is appropriate */ + if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, a->a_desc->ad_type ) ) { + continue; + } + + /* normalize for equality */ + rc = asserted_value_validate_normalize( a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_EXT|SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ASSERTION_SYNTAX, + &mra->ma_value, &value, &text, memctx ); + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) continue; + + /* check search access */ + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, + a->a_desc, &value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) + { + memfree( value.bv_val, memctx ); + continue; + } +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + /* Component Matching */ + if ( mra->ma_cf && + mra->ma_rule->smr_usage & SLAP_MR_COMPONENT ) + { + int ret; + + rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_COMPONENT, + (struct berval*)a, (void*)mra, &text ); + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break; + + if ( ret == 0 ) { + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + } + + } +#endif + + /* check match */ + if ( mra->ma_rule == a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality ) { + bv = a->a_nvals; + + } else { + bv = a->a_vals; + normalize_attribute = 1; + } + + for ( ; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) { + int ret; + struct berval nbv = BER_BVNULL; + + if ( normalize_attribute && mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) { + /* see comment above */ + if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize( + SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX, + mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax, + mra->ma_rule, + bv, &nbv, memctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS ) + { + /* FIXME: stop processing? */ + continue; + } + + } else { + nbv = *bv; + } + + rc = value_match( &ret, a->a_desc, mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_EXT, &nbv, &value, &text ); + + if ( nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) { + memfree( nbv.bv_val, memctx ); + } + + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) break; + + if ( ret == 0 ) { + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + } + } + memfree( value.bv_val, memctx ); + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc; + } + } + + /* check attrs in DN AVAs if required */ + if ( mra->ma_dnattrs && !BER_BVISEMPTY( &e->e_nname ) ) { + LDAPDN dn = NULL; + int iRDN, iAVA; + int rc; + + /* parse and pretty the dn */ + rc = dnPrettyDN( NULL, &e->e_name, &dn, memctx ); + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) { + return LDAP_INVALID_SYNTAX; + } + + /* for each AVA of each RDN ... */ + for ( iRDN = 0; dn[ iRDN ]; iRDN++ ) { + LDAPRDN rdn = dn[ iRDN ]; + + for ( iAVA = 0; rdn[ iAVA ]; iAVA++ ) { + LDAPAVA *ava = rdn[ iAVA ]; + struct berval *bv = &ava->la_value, + value = BER_BVNULL, + nbv = BER_BVNULL; + AttributeDescription *ad = + (AttributeDescription *)ava->la_private; + int ret; + const char *text; + + assert( ad != NULL ); + + if ( mra->ma_desc ) { + /* have a mra type? check for subtype */ + if ( !is_ad_subtype( ad, mra->ma_desc ) ) { + continue; + } + value = mra->ma_value; + + } else { + const char *text = NULL; + + /* check if matching is appropriate */ + if ( !mr_usable_with_at( mra->ma_rule, ad->ad_type ) ) { + continue; + } + + /* normalize for equality */ + rc = asserted_value_validate_normalize( ad, + mra->ma_rule, + SLAP_MR_EXT|SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ASSERTION_SYNTAX, + &mra->ma_value, &value, &text, memctx ); + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) continue; + + /* check search access */ + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, + ad, &value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) + { + memfree( value.bv_val, memctx ); + continue; + } + } + + if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize ) { + /* see comment above */ + if ( mra->ma_rule->smr_normalize( + SLAP_MR_VALUE_OF_ATTRIBUTE_SYNTAX, + mra->ma_rule->smr_syntax, + mra->ma_rule, + bv, &nbv, memctx ) != LDAP_SUCCESS ) + { + /* FIXME: stop processing? */ + rc = LDAP_SUCCESS; + ret = -1; + goto cleanup; + } + + } else { + nbv = *bv; + } + + /* check match */ + rc = value_match( &ret, ad, mra->ma_rule, SLAP_MR_EXT, + &nbv, &value, &text ); + +cleanup:; + if ( !BER_BVISNULL( &value ) && value.bv_val != mra->ma_value.bv_val ) { + memfree( value.bv_val, memctx ); + } + + if ( !BER_BVISNULL( &nbv ) && nbv.bv_val != bv->bv_val ) { + memfree( nbv.bv_val, memctx ); + } + + if ( rc == LDAP_SUCCESS && ret == 0 ) rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + + if ( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) { + ldap_dnfree_x( dn, memctx ); + return rc; + } + } + } + ldap_dnfree_x( dn, memctx ); + } + + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; +} + +static int +test_ava_filter( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + AttributeAssertion *ava, + int type ) +{ + int rc; + Attribute *a; +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + int i, num_attr_vals = 0; + AttributeAliasing *a_alias = NULL; +#endif + + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, + ava->aa_desc, &ava->aa_value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) + { + return LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + } + + if ( ava->aa_desc == slap_schema.si_ad_hasSubordinates + && op && op->o_bd && op->o_bd->be_has_subordinates ) + { + int hasSubordinates = 0; + struct berval hs; + + if( type != LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY && + type != LDAP_FILTER_APPROX ) + { + /* No other match is allowed */ + return LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + } + + if ( op->o_bd->be_has_subordinates( op, e, &hasSubordinates ) != + LDAP_SUCCESS ) + { + return LDAP_OTHER; + } + + if ( hasSubordinates == LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE ) { + hs = slap_true_bv; + + } else if ( hasSubordinates == LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE ) { + hs = slap_false_bv; + + } else { + return LDAP_OTHER; + } + + if ( bvmatch( &ava->aa_value, &hs ) ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + } + + if ( ava->aa_desc == slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN ) { + MatchingRule *mr; + int match; + const char *text; + + if( type != LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY && + type != LDAP_FILTER_APPROX ) + { + /* No other match is allowed */ + return LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + } + + mr = slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN->ad_type->sat_equality; + assert( mr != NULL ); + + rc = value_match( &match, slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN, mr, + SLAP_MR_EXT, &e->e_nname, &ava->aa_value, &text ); + + if( rc != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return rc; + if( match == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + } + + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + if ( is_aliased_attribute && ava->aa_cf ) + { + a_alias = is_aliased_attribute ( ava->aa_desc ); + if ( a_alias ) + ava->aa_desc = a_alias->aa_aliased_ad; + else + ava->aa_cf = NULL; + } +#endif + + for(a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, ava->aa_desc ); + a != NULL; + a = attrs_find( a->a_next, ava->aa_desc ) ) + { + int use; + MatchingRule *mr; + struct berval *bv; + + if (( ava->aa_desc != a->a_desc ) && !access_allowed( op, + e, a->a_desc, &ava->aa_value, ACL_SEARCH, NULL )) + { + rc = LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + continue; + } + + use = SLAP_MR_EQUALITY; + + switch ( type ) { + case LDAP_FILTER_APPROX: + use = SLAP_MR_EQUALITY_APPROX; + mr = a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_approx; + if( mr != NULL ) break; + + /* fallthru: use EQUALITY matching rule if no APPROX rule */ + + case LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY: + /* use variable set above so fall thru use is not clobbered */ + mr = a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_equality; + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_GE: + case LDAP_FILTER_LE: + use = SLAP_MR_ORDERING; + mr = a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_ordering; + break; + + default: + mr = NULL; + } + + if( mr == NULL ) { + rc = LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + continue; + } + + /* We have no Sort optimization for Approx matches */ + if (( a->a_flags & SLAP_ATTR_SORTED_VALS ) && type != LDAP_FILTER_APPROX ) { + unsigned slot; + int ret; + + /* For Ordering matches, we just need to do one comparison with + * either the first (least) or last (greatest) value. + */ + if ( use == SLAP_MR_ORDERING ) { + const char *text; + int match, which; + which = (type == LDAP_FILTER_LE) ? 0 : a->a_numvals-1; + ret = value_match( &match, a->a_desc, mr, use, + &a->a_nvals[which], &ava->aa_value, &text ); + if ( ret != LDAP_SUCCESS ) return ret; + if (( type == LDAP_FILTER_LE && match <= 0 ) || + ( type == LDAP_FILTER_GE && match >= 0 )) + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + continue; + } + /* Only Equality will get here */ + ret = attr_valfind( a, use | SLAP_MR_ASSERTED_VALUE_NORMALIZED_MATCH | + SLAP_MR_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_NORMALIZED_MATCH, + &ava->aa_value, &slot, NULL ); + if ( ret == LDAP_SUCCESS ) + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + else if ( ret != LDAP_NO_SUCH_ATTRIBUTE ) + return ret; +#if 0 + /* The following is useful if we want to know which values + * matched an ordering test. But here we don't care, we just + * want to know if any value did, and that is checked above. + */ + if ( ret == LDAP_NO_SUCH_ATTRIBUTE ) { + /* If insertion point is not the end of the list, there was + * at least one value greater than the assertion. + */ + if ( type == LDAP_FILTER_GE && slot < a->a_numvals ) + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + /* Likewise, if insertion point is not the head of the list, + * there was at least one value less than the assertion. + */ + if ( type == LDAP_FILTER_LE && slot > 0 ) + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + } +#endif + continue; + } + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + if ( nibble_mem_allocator && ava->aa_cf && !a->a_comp_data ) { + /* Component Matching */ + for ( num_attr_vals = 0; a->a_vals[num_attr_vals].bv_val != NULL; num_attr_vals++ ); + if ( num_attr_vals <= 0 )/* no attribute value */ + return LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + num_attr_vals++;/* for NULL termination */ + + /* following malloced will be freed by comp_tree_free () */ + a->a_comp_data = SLAP_MALLOC( sizeof( ComponentData ) + sizeof( ComponentSyntaxInfo* )*num_attr_vals ); + + if ( !a->a_comp_data ) { + return LDAP_NO_MEMORY; + } + + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree = (ComponentSyntaxInfo**)((char*)a->a_comp_data + sizeof(ComponentData)); + i = num_attr_vals; + for ( ; i ; i-- ) { + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[ i-1 ] = (ComponentSyntaxInfo*)NULL; + } + + a->a_comp_data->cd_mem_op = nibble_mem_allocator ( 1024*10*(num_attr_vals-1), 1024 ); + if ( a->a_comp_data->cd_mem_op == NULL ) { + free ( a->a_comp_data ); + a->a_comp_data = NULL; + return LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + } + + i = 0; +#endif + + for ( bv = a->a_nvals; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) { + int ret, match; + const char *text; + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + if( attr_converter && ava->aa_cf && a->a_comp_data ) { + /* Check if decoded component trees are already linked */ + struct berval cf_bv = { 20, "componentFilterMatch" }; + MatchingRule* cf_mr = mr_bvfind( &cf_bv ); + MatchingRuleAssertion mra; + mra.ma_cf = ava->aa_cf; + + if ( a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] == NULL ) + a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] = attr_converter (a, a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_syntax, (a->a_vals + i)); + /* decoding error */ + if ( !a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i] ) { + free_ComponentData ( a ); + return LDAP_OPERATIONS_ERROR; + } + + ret = value_match( &match, a->a_desc, cf_mr, + SLAP_MR_COMPONENT, + (struct berval*)a->a_comp_data->cd_tree[i++], + (void*)&mra, &text ); + if ( ret == LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING ) { + /* cached component tree is broken, just remove it */ + free_ComponentData ( a ); + return ret; + } + if ( a_alias ) + ava->aa_desc = a_alias->aa_aliasing_ad; + + } else +#endif + { + ret = ordered_value_match( &match, a->a_desc, mr, use, + bv, &ava->aa_value, &text ); + } + + if( ret != LDAP_SUCCESS ) { + rc = ret; + break; + } + + switch ( type ) { + case LDAP_FILTER_EQUALITY: + case LDAP_FILTER_APPROX: + if ( match == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_GE: + if ( match >= 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + + case LDAP_FILTER_LE: + if ( match <= 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + } + } + } + +#ifdef LDAP_COMP_MATCH + if ( a_alias ) + ava->aa_desc = a_alias->aa_aliasing_ad; +#endif + + return rc; +} + + +static int +test_presence_filter( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + AttributeDescription *desc ) +{ + Attribute *a; + int rc; + + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, desc, NULL, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) { + return LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + } + + if ( desc == slap_schema.si_ad_hasSubordinates ) { + /* + * XXX: fairly optimistic: if the function is defined, + * then PRESENCE must succeed, because hasSubordinate + * is boolean-valued; I think we may live with this + * simplification by now. + */ + if ( op && op->o_bd && op->o_bd->be_has_subordinates ) { + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + } + + return LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + } + + if ( desc == slap_schema.si_ad_entryDN || + desc == slap_schema.si_ad_subschemaSubentry ) + { + /* entryDN and subschemaSubentry are always present */ + return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + } + + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + + for(a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, desc ); + a != NULL; + a = attrs_find( a->a_next, desc ) ) + { + if (( desc != a->a_desc ) && !access_allowed( op, + e, a->a_desc, NULL, ACL_SEARCH, NULL )) + { + rc = LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + continue; + } + + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + break; + } + + return rc; +} + + +static int +test_filter_and( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + Filter *flist ) +{ + Filter *f; + int rtn = LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; /* True if empty */ + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "=> test_filter_and\n" ); + + for ( f = flist; f != NULL; f = f->f_next ) { + int rc = test_filter( op, e, f ); + + if ( rc == LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE ) { + /* filter is False */ + rtn = rc; + break; + } + + if ( rc != LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE ) { + /* filter is Undefined unless later elements are False */ + rtn = rc; + } + } + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "<= test_filter_and %d\n", rtn ); + + return rtn; +} + +static int +test_filter_or( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + Filter *flist ) +{ + Filter *f; + int rtn = LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; /* False if empty */ + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "=> test_filter_or\n" ); + + for ( f = flist; f != NULL; f = f->f_next ) { + int rc = test_filter( op, e, f ); + + if ( rc == LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE ) { + /* filter is True */ + rtn = rc; + break; + } + + if ( rc != LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE ) { + /* filter is Undefined unless later elements are True */ + rtn = rc; + } + } + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "<= test_filter_or %d\n", rtn ); + return rtn; +} + + +static int +test_substrings_filter( + Operation *op, + Entry *e, + Filter *f ) +{ + Attribute *a; + int rc; + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "begin test_substrings_filter\n" ); + + if ( !access_allowed( op, e, + f->f_sub_desc, NULL, ACL_SEARCH, NULL ) ) + { + return LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + } + + rc = LDAP_COMPARE_FALSE; + + for(a = attrs_find( e->e_attrs, f->f_sub_desc ); + a != NULL; + a = attrs_find( a->a_next, f->f_sub_desc ) ) + { + MatchingRule *mr; + struct berval *bv; + + if (( f->f_sub_desc != a->a_desc ) && !access_allowed( op, + e, a->a_desc, NULL, ACL_SEARCH, NULL )) + { + rc = LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS; + continue; + } + + mr = a->a_desc->ad_type->sat_substr; + if( mr == NULL ) { + rc = LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING; + continue; + } + + for ( bv = a->a_nvals; !BER_BVISNULL( bv ); bv++ ) { + int ret, match; + const char *text; + + ret = value_match( &match, a->a_desc, mr, SLAP_MR_SUBSTR, + bv, f->f_sub, &text ); + + if( ret != LDAP_SUCCESS ) { + rc = ret; + break; + } + if ( match == 0 ) return LDAP_COMPARE_TRUE; + } + } + + Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_FILTER, "end test_substrings_filter %d\n", + rc ); + return rc; +} -- cgit v1.2.3