'\" t .\" Title: LOCK .\" Author: The PostgreSQL Global Development Group .\" Generator: DocBook XSL Stylesheets vsnapshot .\" Date: 2024 .\" Manual: PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation .\" Source: PostgreSQL 16.3 .\" Language: English .\" .TH "LOCK" "7" "2024" "PostgreSQL 16.3" "PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation" .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .\" * Define some portability stuff .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .\" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .\" http://bugs.debian.org/507673 .\" http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2009-02/msg00013.html .\" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq .el .ds Aq ' .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .\" * set default formatting .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .\" disable hyphenation .nh .\" disable justification (adjust text to left margin only) .ad l .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .\" * MAIN CONTENT STARTS HERE * .\" ----------------------------------------------------------------- .SH "NAME" LOCK \- lock a table .SH "SYNOPSIS" .sp .nf LOCK [ TABLE ] [ ONLY ] \fIname\fR [ * ] [, \&.\&.\&.] [ IN \fIlockmode\fR MODE ] [ NOWAIT ] where \fIlockmode\fR is one of: ACCESS SHARE | ROW SHARE | ROW EXCLUSIVE | SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE | SHARE | SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE | EXCLUSIVE | ACCESS EXCLUSIVE .fi .SH "DESCRIPTION" .PP \fBLOCK TABLE\fR obtains a table\-level lock, waiting if necessary for any conflicting locks to be released\&. If NOWAIT is specified, \fBLOCK TABLE\fR does not wait to acquire the desired lock: if it cannot be acquired immediately, the command is aborted and an error is emitted\&. Once obtained, the lock is held for the remainder of the current transaction\&. (There is no \fBUNLOCK TABLE\fR command; locks are always released at transaction end\&.) .PP When a view is locked, all relations appearing in the view definition query are also locked recursively with the same lock mode\&. .PP When acquiring locks automatically for commands that reference tables, PostgreSQL always uses the least restrictive lock mode possible\&. \fBLOCK TABLE\fR provides for cases when you might need more restrictive locking\&. For example, suppose an application runs a transaction at the READ COMMITTED isolation level and needs to ensure that data in a table remains stable for the duration of the transaction\&. To achieve this you could obtain SHARE lock mode over the table before querying\&. This will prevent concurrent data changes and ensure subsequent reads of the table see a stable view of committed data, because SHARE lock mode conflicts with the ROW EXCLUSIVE lock acquired by writers, and your \fBLOCK TABLE \fR\fB\fIname\fR\fR\fB IN SHARE MODE\fR statement will wait until any concurrent holders of ROW EXCLUSIVE mode locks commit or roll back\&. Thus, once you obtain the lock, there are no uncommitted writes outstanding; furthermore none can begin until you release the lock\&. .PP To achieve a similar effect when running a transaction at the REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE isolation level, you have to execute the \fBLOCK TABLE\fR statement before executing any \fBSELECT\fR or data modification statement\&. A REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE transaction\*(Aqs view of data will be frozen when its first \fBSELECT\fR or data modification statement begins\&. A \fBLOCK TABLE\fR later in the transaction will still prevent concurrent writes \(em but it won\*(Aqt ensure that what the transaction reads corresponds to the latest committed values\&. .PP If a transaction of this sort is going to change the data in the table, then it should use SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock mode instead of SHARE mode\&. This ensures that only one transaction of this type runs at a time\&. Without this, a deadlock is possible: two transactions might both acquire SHARE mode, and then be unable to also acquire ROW EXCLUSIVE mode to actually perform their updates\&. (Note that a transaction\*(Aqs own locks never conflict, so a transaction can acquire ROW EXCLUSIVE mode when it holds SHARE mode \(em but not if anyone else holds SHARE mode\&.) To avoid deadlocks, make sure all transactions acquire locks on the same objects in the same order, and if multiple lock modes are involved for a single object, then transactions should always acquire the most restrictive mode first\&. .PP More information about the lock modes and locking strategies can be found in Section\ \&13.3\&. .SH "PARAMETERS" .PP \fIname\fR .RS 4 The name (optionally schema\-qualified) of an existing table to lock\&. If ONLY is specified before the table name, only that table is locked\&. If ONLY is not specified, the table and all its descendant tables (if any) are locked\&. Optionally, * can be specified after the table name to explicitly indicate that descendant tables are included\&. .sp The command LOCK TABLE a, b; is equivalent to LOCK TABLE a; LOCK TABLE b;\&. The tables are locked one\-by\-one in the order specified in the \fBLOCK TABLE\fR command\&. .RE .PP \fIlockmode\fR .RS 4 The lock mode specifies which locks this lock conflicts with\&. Lock modes are described in Section\ \&13.3\&. .sp If no lock mode is specified, then ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, the most restrictive mode, is used\&. .RE .PP NOWAIT .RS 4 Specifies that \fBLOCK TABLE\fR should not wait for any conflicting locks to be released: if the specified lock(s) cannot be acquired immediately without waiting, the transaction is aborted\&. .RE .SH "NOTES" .PP To lock a table, the user must have the right privilege for the specified \fIlockmode\fR, or be the table\*(Aqs owner or a superuser\&. If the user has UPDATE, DELETE, or TRUNCATE privileges on the table, any \fIlockmode\fR is permitted\&. If the user has INSERT privileges on the table, ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE (or a less\-conflicting mode as described in Section\ \&13.3) is permitted\&. If a user has SELECT privileges on the table, ACCESS SHARE MODE is permitted\&. .PP The user performing the lock on the view must have the corresponding privilege on the view\&. In addition, by default, the view\*(Aqs owner must have the relevant privileges on the underlying base relations, whereas the user performing the lock does not need any permissions on the underlying base relations\&. However, if the view has security_invoker set to true (see \fBCREATE VIEW\fR), the user performing the lock, rather than the view owner, must have the relevant privileges on the underlying base relations\&. .PP \fBLOCK TABLE\fR is useless outside a transaction block: the lock would remain held only to the completion of the statement\&. Therefore PostgreSQL reports an error if \fBLOCK\fR is used outside a transaction block\&. Use \fBBEGIN\fR and \fBCOMMIT\fR (or \fBROLLBACK\fR) to define a transaction block\&. .PP \fBLOCK TABLE\fR only deals with table\-level locks, and so the mode names involving ROW are all misnomers\&. These mode names should generally be read as indicating the intention of the user to acquire row\-level locks within the locked table\&. Also, ROW EXCLUSIVE mode is a shareable table lock\&. Keep in mind that all the lock modes have identical semantics so far as \fBLOCK TABLE\fR is concerned, differing only in the rules about which modes conflict with which\&. For information on how to acquire an actual row\-level lock, see Section\ \&13.3.2 and The Locking Clause in the \fBSELECT\fR(7) documentation\&. .SH "EXAMPLES" .PP Obtain a SHARE lock on a primary key table when going to perform inserts into a foreign key table: .sp .if n \{\ .RS 4 .\} .nf BEGIN WORK; LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE MODE; SELECT id FROM films WHERE name = \*(AqStar Wars: Episode I \- The Phantom Menace\*(Aq; \-\- Do ROLLBACK if record was not returned INSERT INTO films_user_comments VALUES (_id_, \*(AqGREAT! I was waiting for it for so long!\*(Aq); COMMIT WORK; .fi .if n \{\ .RE .\} .PP Take a SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock on a primary key table when going to perform a delete operation: .sp .if n \{\ .RS 4 .\} .nf BEGIN WORK; LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE; DELETE FROM films_user_comments WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM films WHERE rating < 5); DELETE FROM films WHERE rating < 5; COMMIT WORK; .fi .if n \{\ .RE .\} .SH "COMPATIBILITY" .PP There is no \fBLOCK TABLE\fR in the SQL standard, which instead uses \fBSET TRANSACTION\fR to specify concurrency levels on transactions\&. PostgreSQL supports that too; see SET TRANSACTION (\fBSET_TRANSACTION\fR(7)) for details\&. .PP Except for ACCESS SHARE, ACCESS EXCLUSIVE, and SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock modes, the PostgreSQL lock modes and the \fBLOCK TABLE\fR syntax are compatible with those present in Oracle\&.