Adding upstream version 1.67.1+dfsg1.upstream/1.67.1+dfsg1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

6 files changed, 119 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0207.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0207.md
index 8a7923ac9..95e7c9fc7 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0207.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0207.md
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-A type parameter that is specified for `impl` is not constrained.
+A type, const or lifetime parameter that is specified for `impl` is not
+constrained.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
@@ -14,8 +15,8 @@ impl<T: Default> Foo {
 }
 ```
 
-Any type parameter of an `impl` must meet at least one of
-the following criteria:
+Any type or const parameter of an `impl` must meet at least one of the
+following criteria:
 
  - it appears in the _implementing type_ of the impl, e.g. `impl<T> Foo<T>`
  - for a trait impl, it appears in the _implemented trait_, e.g.
@@ -23,6 +24,9 @@ the following criteria:
  - it is bound as an associated type, e.g. `impl<T, U> SomeTrait for T
    where T: AnotherTrait<AssocType=U>`
 
+Any unconstrained lifetime parameter of an `impl` is not supported if the
+lifetime parameter is used by an associated type.
+
 ### Error example 1
 
 Suppose we have a struct `Foo` and we would like to define some methods for it.
@@ -32,7 +36,6 @@ The problem is that the parameter `T` does not appear in the implementing type
 (`Foo`) of the impl. In this case, we can fix the error by moving the type
 parameter from the `impl` to the method `get`:
 
-
 ```
 struct Foo;
 
@@ -128,6 +131,70 @@ impl<T: Default> Maker<Foo<T>> for FooMaker {
 }
 ```
 
+### Error example 3
+
+Suppose we have a struct `Foo` and we would like to define some methods for it.
+The following code example has a definition which leads to a compiler error:
+
+```compile_fail,E0207
+struct Foo;
+
+impl<const T: i32> Foo {
+    // error: the const parameter `T` is not constrained by the impl trait, self
+    // type, or predicates [E0207]
+    fn get(&self) -> i32 {
+        i32::default()
+    }
+}
+```
+
+The problem is that the const parameter `T` does not appear in the implementing
+type (`Foo`) of the impl. In this case, we can fix the error by moving the type
+parameter from the `impl` to the method `get`:
+
+
+```
+struct Foo;
+
+// Move the const parameter from the impl to the method
+impl Foo {
+    fn get<const T: i32>(&self) -> i32 {
+        i32::default()
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Error example 4
+
+Suppose we have a struct `Foo` and a struct `Bar` that uses lifetime `'a`. We
+would like to implement trait `Contains` for `Foo`. The trait `Contains` have
+the associated type `B`. The following code example has a definition which
+leads to a compiler error:
+
+```compile_fail,E0207
+struct Foo;
+struct Bar<'a>;
+
+trait Contains {
+    type B;
+
+    fn get(&self) -> i32;
+}
+
+impl<'a> Contains for Foo {
+    type B = Bar<'a>;
+
+    // error: the lifetime parameter `'a` is not constrained by the impl trait,
+    // self type, or predicates [E0207]
+    fn get(&self) -> i32 {
+        i32::default()
+    }
+}
+```
+
+Please note that unconstrained lifetime parameters are not supported if they are
+being used by an associated type.
+
 ### Additional information
 
 For more information, please see [RFC 447].
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0322.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0322.md
index ccef8681d..194bbd83b 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0322.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0322.md
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-The `Sized` trait was implemented explicitly.
+A built-in trait was implemented explicitly. All implementations of the trait
+are provided automatically by the compiler.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0382.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0382.md
index d1408a062..cbc4980f8 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0382.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0382.md
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ with `#[derive(Clone)]`.
 
 Some types have no ownership semantics at all and are trivial to duplicate. An
 example is `i32` and the other number types. We don't have to call `.clone()` to
-clone them, because they are marked `Copy` in addition to `Clone`.  Implicit
+clone them, because they are marked `Copy` in addition to `Clone`. Implicit
 cloning is more convenient in this case. We can mark our own types `Copy` if
 all their members also are marked `Copy`.
 
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0706.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0706.md
index d379b8a23..fabd855a2 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0706.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0706.md
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ You might be interested in visiting the [async book] for further information.
 [`async-trait` crate]: https://crates.io/crates/async-trait
 [async-is-hard]: https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2019/10/26/async-fn-in-traits-are-hard/
 [Generic Associated Types]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44265
-[async book]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-book/07_workarounds/06_async_in_traits.html
+[async book]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-book/07_workarounds/05_async_in_traits.html
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0760.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0760.md
index e1dcfefeb..85e5faada 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0760.md
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0760.md
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
+#### Note: this error code is no longer emitted by the compiler.
+
 `async fn`/`impl trait` return type cannot contain a projection
 or `Self` that references lifetimes from a parent scope.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
-```compile_fail,E0760,edition2018
+```compile_fail,edition2018
 struct S<'a>(&'a i32);
 
 impl<'a> S<'a> {
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0791.md b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0791.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..61d2f511a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0791.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+Static variables with the `#[linkage]` attribute within external blocks
+must have one of the following types, which are equivalent to a nullable
+pointer in C:
+
+* `*mut T` or `*const T`, where `T` may be any type.
+
+* An enumerator type with no `#[repr]` attribute and with two variants, where
+  one of the variants has no fields, and the other has a single field of one of
+  the following non-nullable types:
+  * Reference type
+  * Function pointer type
+
+  The variants can appear in either order.
+
+For example, the following declaration is invalid:
+
+```compile_fail,E0791
+#![feature(linkage)]
+
+extern "C" {
+    #[linkage = "extern_weak"]
+    static foo: i8;
+}
+```
+
+The following declarations are valid:
+
+```
+#![feature(linkage)]
+
+extern "C" {
+    #[linkage = "extern_weak"]
+    static foo: Option<unsafe extern "C" fn()>;
+
+    #[linkage = "extern_weak"]
+    static bar: Option<&'static i8>;
+
+    #[linkage = "extern_weak"]
+    static baz: *mut i8;
+}
+```