summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/compiler/rustc_traits
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:06:31 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:06:31 +0000
commit2ff14448863ac1a1dd9533461708e29aae170c2d (patch)
tree85b9fea2bbfe3f06473cfa381eed11f273b57c5c /compiler/rustc_traits
parentAdding debian version 1.64.0+dfsg1-1. (diff)
downloadrustc-2ff14448863ac1a1dd9533461708e29aae170c2d.tar.xz
rustc-2ff14448863ac1a1dd9533461708e29aae170c2d.zip
Adding debian version 1.65.0+dfsg1-2.debian/1.65.0+dfsg1-2
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_traits')
-rw-r--r--compiler/rustc_traits/src/chalk/lowering.rs13
-rw-r--r--compiler/rustc_traits/src/implied_outlives_bounds.rs69
-rw-r--r--compiler/rustc_traits/src/lib.rs4
-rw-r--r--compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs58
4 files changed, 79 insertions, 65 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/chalk/lowering.rs b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/chalk/lowering.rs
index c7c604e14..45d5ea93d 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/chalk/lowering.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/chalk/lowering.rs
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ impl<'tcx> LowerInto<'tcx, chalk_ir::GoalData<RustInterner<'tcx>>> for ty::Predi
GenericArgKind::Const(..) => {
chalk_ir::GoalData::All(chalk_ir::Goals::empty(interner))
}
- GenericArgKind::Lifetime(lt) => bug!("unexpect well formed predicate: {:?}", lt),
+ GenericArgKind::Lifetime(lt) => bug!("unexpected well formed predicate: {:?}", lt),
},
ty::PredicateKind::ObjectSafe(t) => chalk_ir::GoalData::DomainGoal(
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ impl<'tcx> LowerInto<'tcx, chalk_ir::Ty<RustInterner<'tcx>>> for Ty<'tcx> {
)),
})
}
- ty::Dynamic(predicates, region) => chalk_ir::TyKind::Dyn(chalk_ir::DynTy {
+ // FIXME(dyn-star): handle the dynamic kind (dyn or dyn*)
+ ty::Dynamic(predicates, region, _kind) => chalk_ir::TyKind::Dyn(chalk_ir::DynTy {
bounds: predicates.lower_into(interner),
lifetime: region.lower_into(interner),
}),
@@ -485,10 +486,6 @@ impl<'tcx> LowerInto<'tcx, chalk_ir::Lifetime<RustInterner<'tcx>>> for Region<'t
})
.intern(interner)
}
- ty::ReEmpty(ui) => {
- chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Empty(chalk_ir::UniverseIndex { counter: ui.index() })
- .intern(interner)
- }
ty::ReErased => chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Erased.intern(interner),
}
}
@@ -510,8 +507,8 @@ impl<'tcx> LowerInto<'tcx, Region<'tcx>> for &chalk_ir::Lifetime<RustInterner<'t
name: ty::BoundRegionKind::BrAnon(p.idx as u32),
}),
chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Static => return interner.tcx.lifetimes.re_static,
- chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Empty(ui) => {
- ty::ReEmpty(ty::UniverseIndex::from_usize(ui.counter))
+ chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Empty(_) => {
+ bug!("Chalk should not have been passed an empty lifetime.")
}
chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Erased => return interner.tcx.lifetimes.re_erased,
chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Phantom(void, _) => match *void {},
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/implied_outlives_bounds.rs b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/implied_outlives_bounds.rs
index e3e78f70b..691b79f10 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/implied_outlives_bounds.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/implied_outlives_bounds.rs
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
let mut checked_wf_args = rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet::default();
let mut wf_args = vec![ty.into()];
- let mut implied_bounds = vec![];
+ let mut outlives_bounds: Vec<ty::OutlivesPredicate<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>, ty::Region<'tcx>>> =
+ vec![];
let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(tcx);
@@ -65,30 +66,17 @@ fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
// than the ultimate set. (Note: normally there won't be
// unresolved inference variables here anyway, but there might be
// during typeck under some circumstances.)
+ //
+ // FIXME(@lcnr): It's not really "always fine", having fewer implied
+ // bounds can be backward incompatible, e.g. #101951 was caused by
+ // us not dealing with inference vars in `TypeOutlives` predicates.
let obligations = wf::obligations(infcx, param_env, hir::CRATE_HIR_ID, 0, arg, DUMMY_SP)
.unwrap_or_default();
- // N.B., all of these predicates *ought* to be easily proven
- // true. In fact, their correctness is (mostly) implied by
- // other parts of the program. However, in #42552, we had
- // an annoying scenario where:
- //
- // - Some `T::Foo` gets normalized, resulting in a
- // variable `_1` and a `T: Trait<Foo=_1>` constraint
- // (not sure why it couldn't immediately get
- // solved). This result of `_1` got cached.
- // - These obligations were dropped on the floor here,
- // rather than being registered.
- // - Then later we would get a request to normalize
- // `T::Foo` which would result in `_1` being used from
- // the cache, but hence without the `T: Trait<Foo=_1>`
- // constraint. As a result, `_1` never gets resolved,
- // and we get an ICE (in dropck).
- //
- // Therefore, we register any predicates involving
- // inference variables. We restrict ourselves to those
- // involving inference variables both for efficiency and
- // to avoids duplicate errors that otherwise show up.
+ // While these predicates should all be implied by other parts of
+ // the program, they are still relevant as they may constrain
+ // inference variables, which is necessary to add the correct
+ // implied bounds in some cases, mostly when dealing with projections.
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(
infcx,
obligations.iter().filter(|o| o.predicate.has_infer_types_or_consts()).cloned(),
@@ -96,10 +84,10 @@ fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
// From the full set of obligations, just filter down to the
// region relationships.
- implied_bounds.extend(obligations.into_iter().flat_map(|obligation| {
+ outlives_bounds.extend(obligations.into_iter().filter_map(|obligation| {
assert!(!obligation.has_escaping_bound_vars());
match obligation.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
- None => vec![],
+ None => None,
Some(pred) => match pred {
ty::PredicateKind::Trait(..)
| ty::PredicateKind::Subtype(..)
@@ -109,21 +97,18 @@ fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
| ty::PredicateKind::ObjectSafe(..)
| ty::PredicateKind::ConstEvaluatable(..)
| ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(..)
- | ty::PredicateKind::TypeWellFormedFromEnv(..) => vec![],
+ | ty::PredicateKind::TypeWellFormedFromEnv(..) => None,
ty::PredicateKind::WellFormed(arg) => {
wf_args.push(arg);
- vec![]
+ None
}
ty::PredicateKind::RegionOutlives(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r_a, r_b)) => {
- vec![OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(r_b, r_a)]
+ Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r_a.into(), r_b))
}
ty::PredicateKind::TypeOutlives(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty_a, r_b)) => {
- let ty_a = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty_a);
- let mut components = smallvec![];
- push_outlives_components(tcx, ty_a, &mut components);
- implied_bounds_from_components(r_b, components)
+ Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty_a.into(), r_b))
}
},
}
@@ -133,9 +118,27 @@ fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
// Ensure that those obligations that we had to solve
// get solved *here*.
match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx).as_slice() {
- [] => Ok(implied_bounds),
- _ => Err(NoSolution),
+ [] => (),
+ _ => return Err(NoSolution),
}
+
+ // We lazily compute the outlives components as
+ // `select_all_or_error` constrains inference variables.
+ let implied_bounds = outlives_bounds
+ .into_iter()
+ .flat_map(|ty::OutlivesPredicate(a, r_b)| match a.unpack() {
+ ty::GenericArgKind::Lifetime(r_a) => vec![OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(r_b, r_a)],
+ ty::GenericArgKind::Type(ty_a) => {
+ let ty_a = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty_a);
+ let mut components = smallvec![];
+ push_outlives_components(tcx, ty_a, &mut components);
+ implied_bounds_from_components(r_b, components)
+ }
+ ty::GenericArgKind::Const(_) => unreachable!(),
+ })
+ .collect();
+
+ Ok(implied_bounds)
}
/// When we have an implied bound that `T: 'a`, we can further break
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/lib.rs b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/lib.rs
index 2bea164c0..2d39e973e 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/lib.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/lib.rs
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
//! New recursive solver modeled on Chalk's recursive solver. Most of
//! the guts are broken up into modules; see the comments in those modules.
-#![feature(let_else)]
+#![deny(rustc::untranslatable_diagnostic)]
+#![deny(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]
+#![cfg_attr(bootstrap, feature(let_else))]
#![recursion_limit = "256"]
#[macro_use]
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs
index d895b647d..1bb6506b3 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_infer::infer::at::ToTrace;
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::{Canonical, QueryResponse};
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefiningAnchor, InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
-use rustc_infer::traits::TraitEngineExt as _;
+use rustc_infer::traits::{ObligationCauseCode, TraitEngineExt as _};
use rustc_middle::ty::query::Providers;
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::{GenericArg, Subst, UserSelfTy, UserSubsts};
use rustc_middle::ty::{
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::type_op::subtype::Subtype;
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::{Fallible, NoSolution};
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{Normalized, Obligation, ObligationCause, TraitEngine};
use std::fmt;
+use std::iter::zip;
pub(crate) fn provide(p: &mut Providers) {
*p = Providers {
@@ -61,14 +62,15 @@ pub fn type_op_ascribe_user_type_with_span<'a, 'tcx: 'a>(
mir_ty, def_id, user_substs
);
- let mut cx = AscribeUserTypeCx { infcx, param_env, fulfill_cx };
- cx.relate_mir_and_user_ty(mir_ty, def_id, user_substs, span)?;
+ let mut cx = AscribeUserTypeCx { infcx, param_env, span: span.unwrap_or(DUMMY_SP), fulfill_cx };
+ cx.relate_mir_and_user_ty(mir_ty, def_id, user_substs)?;
Ok(())
}
struct AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
infcx: &'me InferCtxt<'me, 'tcx>,
param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
+ span: Span,
fulfill_cx: &'me mut dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>,
}
@@ -77,12 +79,15 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
where
T: TypeFoldable<'tcx>,
{
+ self.normalize_with_cause(value, ObligationCause::misc(self.span, hir::CRATE_HIR_ID))
+ }
+
+ fn normalize_with_cause<T>(&mut self, value: T, cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>) -> T
+ where
+ T: TypeFoldable<'tcx>,
+ {
self.infcx
- .partially_normalize_associated_types_in(
- ObligationCause::misc(DUMMY_SP, hir::CRATE_HIR_ID),
- self.param_env,
- value,
- )
+ .partially_normalize_associated_types_in(cause, self.param_env, value)
.into_value_registering_obligations(self.infcx, self.fulfill_cx)
}
@@ -91,18 +96,13 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
{
self.infcx
- .at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), self.param_env)
+ .at(&ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(self.span), self.param_env)
.relate(a, variance, b)?
.into_value_registering_obligations(self.infcx, self.fulfill_cx);
Ok(())
}
- fn prove_predicate(&mut self, predicate: Predicate<'tcx>, span: Option<Span>) {
- let cause = if let Some(span) = span {
- ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(span)
- } else {
- ObligationCause::dummy()
- };
+ fn prove_predicate(&mut self, predicate: Predicate<'tcx>, cause: ObligationCause<'tcx>) {
self.fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation(
self.infcx,
Obligation::new(cause, self.param_env, predicate),
@@ -120,20 +120,20 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
EarlyBinder(value).subst(self.tcx(), substs)
}
+ #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
fn relate_mir_and_user_ty(
&mut self,
mir_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
def_id: DefId,
user_substs: UserSubsts<'tcx>,
- span: Option<Span>,
) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
let UserSubsts { user_self_ty, substs } = user_substs;
let tcx = self.tcx();
let ty = tcx.type_of(def_id);
let ty = self.subst(ty, substs);
- debug!("relate_type_and_user_type: ty of def-id is {:?}", ty);
let ty = self.normalize(ty);
+ debug!("relate_type_and_user_type: ty of def-id is {:?}", ty);
self.relate(mir_ty, Variance::Invariant, ty)?;
@@ -144,10 +144,22 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
// outlives" error messages.
let instantiated_predicates =
self.tcx().predicates_of(def_id).instantiate(self.tcx(), substs);
- debug!(?instantiated_predicates.predicates);
- for instantiated_predicate in instantiated_predicates.predicates {
- let instantiated_predicate = self.normalize(instantiated_predicate);
- self.prove_predicate(instantiated_predicate, span);
+
+ let cause = ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(self.span);
+
+ debug!(?instantiated_predicates);
+ for (instantiated_predicate, predicate_span) in
+ zip(instantiated_predicates.predicates, instantiated_predicates.spans)
+ {
+ let span = if self.span == DUMMY_SP { predicate_span } else { self.span };
+ let cause = ObligationCause::new(
+ span,
+ hir::CRATE_HIR_ID,
+ ObligationCauseCode::AscribeUserTypeProvePredicate(predicate_span),
+ );
+ let instantiated_predicate =
+ self.normalize_with_cause(instantiated_predicate, cause.clone());
+ self.prove_predicate(instantiated_predicate, cause);
}
if let Some(UserSelfTy { impl_def_id, self_ty }) = user_self_ty {
@@ -160,7 +172,7 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
self.prove_predicate(
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::WellFormed(impl_self_ty.into()))
.to_predicate(self.tcx()),
- span,
+ cause.clone(),
);
}
@@ -177,7 +189,7 @@ impl<'me, 'tcx> AscribeUserTypeCx<'me, 'tcx> {
// which...could happen with normalization...
self.prove_predicate(
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::PredicateKind::WellFormed(ty.into())).to_predicate(self.tcx()),
- span,
+ cause,
);
Ok(())
}