summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000
commit698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 (patch)
tree173a775858bd501c378080a10dca74132f05bc50 /src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadrustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.tar.xz
rustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.zip
Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.upstream/1.64.0+dfsg1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs')
-rw-r--r--src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs149
1 files changed, 149 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs b/src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..902a66848
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/consts/const-int-unchecked.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+#![feature(core_intrinsics)]
+#![feature(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
+
+use std::intrinsics;
+
+// The documentation of `unchecked_shl` states that it:
+//
+// Performs an unchecked left shift, resulting in undefined behavior when
+// y < 0 or y >= N, where N is the width of T in bits.
+//
+// So we check this for a few `y`.
+
+// unsigned types:
+
+const SHL_U8: u8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_u8, 8) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_U16: u16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_u16, 16) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_U32: u32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_u32, 32) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_U64: u64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_u64, 64) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_U128: u128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_u128, 128) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// signed types:
+
+const SHL_I8: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i8, 8) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I16: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_16, 16) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I32: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i32, 32) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I64: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i64, 64) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I128: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i128, 128) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// and make sure we capture y < 0:
+
+const SHL_I8_NEG: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i8, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I16_NEG: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_16, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I32_NEG: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i32, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I64_NEG: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i64, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I128_NEG: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i128, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// and that there's no special relation to the value -1 by picking some
+// negative values at random:
+
+const SHL_I8_NEG_RANDOM: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i8, -6) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I16_NEG_RANDOM: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_16, -13) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I32_NEG_RANDOM: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i32, -25) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I64_NEG_RANDOM: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i64, -30) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHL_I128_NEG_RANDOM: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shl(5_i128, -93) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// Repeat it all over for `unchecked_shr`
+
+// unsigned types:
+
+const SHR_U8: u8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_u8, 8) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_U16: u16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_u16, 16) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_U32: u32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_u32, 32) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_U64: u64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_u64, 64) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_U128: u128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_u128, 128) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// signed types:
+
+const SHR_I8: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i8, 8) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I16: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_16, 16) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I32: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i32, 32) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I64: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i64, 64) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I128: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i128, 128) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// and make sure we capture y < 0:
+
+const SHR_I8_NEG: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i8, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I16_NEG: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_16, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I32_NEG: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i32, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I64_NEG: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i64, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I128_NEG: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i128, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// and that there's no special relation to the value -1 by picking some
+// negative values at random:
+
+const SHR_I8_NEG_RANDOM: i8 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i8, -6) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I16_NEG_RANDOM: i16 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_16, -13) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I32_NEG_RANDOM: i32 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i32, -25) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I64_NEG_RANDOM: i64 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i64, -30) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const SHR_I128_NEG_RANDOM: i128 = unsafe { intrinsics::unchecked_shr(5_i128, -93) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// Other arithmetic functions:
+
+const _: u16 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_add(40000u16, 30000) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+const _: u32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_sub(14u32, 22) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+const _: u16 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_mul(300u16, 250u16) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+const _: i32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_div(1, 0) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const _: i32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_div(i32::MIN, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+const _: i32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_rem(1, 0) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const _: i32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::unchecked_rem(i32::MIN, -1) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+// capture fault with zero value
+
+const _: u32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::ctlz_nonzero(0) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+const _: u32 = unsafe { std::intrinsics::cttz_nonzero(0) };
+//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+
+fn main() {}