Merging upstream version 1.68.2+dfsg1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/ui/rfc-1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.rs b/src/test/ui/rfc-1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 1699dae46..000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/rfc-1445-restrict-constants-in-patterns/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
-// structural-match ADT might try to hold a
-// non-structural-match in hidden manner that lets matches
-// through that we had intended to reject.
-//
-// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
-#![warn(indirect_structural_match)]
-// run-pass
-
-struct NoDerive(#[allow(unused_tuple_struct_fields)] i32);
-
-// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
-impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
-
-impl Eq for NoDerive { }
-
-#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
-struct WrapParam<'a, T>(&'a &'a T);
-
-const WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM: & &WrapParam<NoDerive> = & &WrapParam(& & NoDerive(0));
-
-fn main() {
-    match WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM {
-        WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
-        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
-        //~| WARN this was previously accepted
-        _ => { println!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM correctly did not match itself"); }
-    }
-}