Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.upstream/1.64.0+dfsg1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 150 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_powf.stderr b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_powf.stderr
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2422eb911
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_powf.stderr
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:6:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f32.powf(x);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp2()`
+   |
+   = note: `-D clippy::suboptimal-flops` implied by `-D warnings`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:7:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f32.powf(3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f32.exp2()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:8:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f32.powf(-3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f32).exp2()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:9:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(x);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:10:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f32.exp()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:11:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f32::consts::E.powf(-3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f32).exp()`
+
+error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:12:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 2.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.sqrt()`
+
+error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:13:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 3.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.cbrt()`
+   |
+   = note: `-D clippy::imprecise-flops` implied by `-D warnings`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:14:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(3.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:15:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(-2.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:16:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(16_777_215.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(16_777_215)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:17:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(-16_777_215.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-16_777_215)`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:25:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f64.powf(x);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp2()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:26:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f64.powf(3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp2()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:27:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = 2f64.powf(-3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp2()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:28:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(x);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:29:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp()`
+
+error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:30:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(-3.1);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp()`
+
+error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:31:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 2.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.sqrt()`
+
+error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:32:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 3.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.cbrt()`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:33:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(3.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:34:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(-2.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:35:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(-2_147_483_648.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2_147_483_648)`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+  --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:36:13
+   |
+LL |     let _ = x.powf(2_147_483_647.0);
+   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(2_147_483_647)`
+
+error: aborting due to 24 previous errors
+