summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs')
-rw-r--r--src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs390
1 files changed, 390 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs b/src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..70ef10645
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/incremental/hashes/enum_constructors.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
+// This test case tests the incremental compilation hash (ICH) implementation
+// for struct constructor expressions.
+
+// The general pattern followed here is: Change one thing between rev1 and rev2
+// and make sure that the hash has changed, then change nothing between rev2 and
+// rev3 and make sure that the hash has not changed.
+
+// build-pass (FIXME(62277): could be check-pass?)
+// revisions: cfail1 cfail2 cfail3 cfail4 cfail5 cfail6
+// compile-flags: -Z query-dep-graph -O
+// [cfail1]compile-flags: -Zincremental-ignore-spans
+// [cfail2]compile-flags: -Zincremental-ignore-spans
+// [cfail3]compile-flags: -Zincremental-ignore-spans
+// [cfail4]compile-flags: -Zincremental-relative-spans
+// [cfail5]compile-flags: -Zincremental-relative-spans
+// [cfail6]compile-flags: -Zincremental-relative-spans
+
+#![allow(warnings)]
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![crate_type="rlib"]
+
+
+pub enum Enum {
+ Struct {
+ x: i32,
+ y: i64,
+ z: i16,
+ },
+ Tuple(i32, i64, i16)
+}
+
+// Change field value (struct-like) -----------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_field_value_struct_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ }
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_field_value_struct_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 2,
+ z: 2,
+ }
+}
+
+
+
+// Change field order (struct-like) -----------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_field_order_struct_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Struct {
+ x: 3,
+ y: 4,
+ z: 5,
+ }
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck,optimized_mir")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+// FIXME(michaelwoerister):Interesting. I would have thought that that changes the MIR. And it
+// would if it were not all constants
+pub fn change_field_order_struct_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Struct {
+ y: 4,
+ x: 3,
+ z: 5,
+ }
+}
+
+
+pub enum Enum2 {
+ Struct {
+ x: i8,
+ y: i8,
+ z: i8,
+ },
+ Struct2 {
+ x: i8,
+ y: i8,
+ z: i8,
+ },
+ Tuple(u16, u16, u16),
+ Tuple2(u64, u64, u64),
+}
+
+// Change constructor path (struct-like) ------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_struct_like() {
+ let _ = Enum ::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ };
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_struct_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ };
+}
+
+
+
+// Change variant (regular struct) ------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_struct_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ };
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_struct_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Struct2 {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ };
+}
+
+
+// Change constructor path indirectly (struct-like) -------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_path_indirectly_struct_like {
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Enum as TheEnum;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Enum2 as TheEnum;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail2",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail5",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> TheEnum {
+ TheEnum::Struct {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+
+// Change constructor variant indirectly (struct-like) ---------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_variant_indirectly_struct_like {
+ use super::Enum2;
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Enum2::Struct as Variant;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Enum2::Struct2 as Variant;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> Enum2 {
+ Variant {
+ x: 0,
+ y: 1,
+ z: 2,
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+
+// Change field value (tuple-like) -------------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_field_value_tuple_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Tuple(0, 1, 2)
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_field_value_tuple_like() -> Enum {
+ Enum::Tuple(0, 1, 3)
+}
+
+
+
+// Change constructor path (tuple-like) --------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_tuple_like() {
+ let _ = Enum ::Tuple(0, 1, 2);
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail2",
+ except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck"
+)]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail5",
+ except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck"
+)]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_tuple_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Tuple(0, 1, 2);
+}
+
+
+
+// Change constructor variant (tuple-like) --------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_tuple_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Tuple (0, 1, 2);
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail2",
+ except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck"
+)]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail5",
+ except="hir_owner_nodes,typeck"
+)]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_tuple_like() {
+ let _ = Enum2::Tuple2(0, 1, 2);
+}
+
+
+// Change constructor path indirectly (tuple-like) ---------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_path_indirectly_tuple_like {
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Enum as TheEnum;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Enum2 as TheEnum;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail2",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail5",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> TheEnum {
+ TheEnum::Tuple(0, 1, 2)
+ }
+}
+
+
+
+// Change constructor variant indirectly (tuple-like) ---------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_variant_indirectly_tuple_like {
+ use super::Enum2;
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Enum2::Tuple as Variant;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Enum2::Tuple2 as Variant;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,typeck")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,typeck")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> Enum2 {
+ Variant(0, 1, 2)
+ }
+}
+
+
+pub enum Clike {
+ A,
+ B,
+ C
+}
+
+pub enum Clike2 {
+ B,
+ C,
+ D
+}
+
+// Change constructor path (C-like) --------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_c_like() {
+ let _x = Clike ::B;
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,typeck")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,typeck")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_path_c_like() {
+ let _x = Clike2::B;
+}
+
+
+
+// Change constructor variant (C-like) --------------------------------------
+#[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_c_like() {
+ let _x = Clike::A;
+}
+
+#[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes")]
+#[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+pub fn change_constructor_variant_c_like() {
+ let _x = Clike::C;
+}
+
+
+// Change constructor path indirectly (C-like) ---------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_path_indirectly_c_like {
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Clike as TheEnum;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Clike2 as TheEnum;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail2",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(
+ cfg="cfail5",
+ except="fn_sig,hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,\
+ typeck"
+ )]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> TheEnum {
+ TheEnum::B
+ }
+}
+
+
+
+// Change constructor variant indirectly (C-like) ---------------------------
+pub mod change_constructor_variant_indirectly_c_like {
+ use super::Clike;
+ #[cfg(any(cfail1,cfail4))]
+ use super::Clike::A as Variant;
+ #[cfg(not(any(cfail1,cfail4)))]
+ use super::Clike::B as Variant;
+
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail2", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail5", except="hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir")]
+ #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail6")]
+ pub fn function() -> Clike {
+ Variant
+ }
+}
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-09-07 01:30:00 +0000