1 files changed, 0 insertions, 71 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/rustdoc/hide-complex-unevaluated-consts.rs b/src/test/rustdoc/hide-complex-unevaluated-consts.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index ba623246a..000000000
--- a/src/test/rustdoc/hide-complex-unevaluated-consts.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
-// Regression test for issue #97933.
-//
-// Test that certain unevaluated constant expressions that are
-// deemed too verbose or complex and that may leak private or
-// `doc(hidden)` struct fields are not displayed in the documentation.
-//
-// Read the documentation of `rustdoc::clean::utils::print_const_expr`
-// for further details.
-
-// @has hide_complex_unevaluated_consts/trait.Container.html
-pub trait Container {
-    // A helper constant that prevents const expressions containing it
-    // from getting fully evaluated since it doesn't have a body and
-    // thus is non-reducible. This allows us to specifically test the
-    // pretty-printing of *unevaluated* consts.
-    const ABSTRACT: i32;
-
-    // Ensure that the private field does not get leaked:
-    //
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.STRUCT0"]' \
-    //        'const STRUCT0: Struct = _'
-    const STRUCT0: Struct = Struct { private: () };
-
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.STRUCT1"]' \
-    //        'const STRUCT1: (Struct,) = _'
-    const STRUCT1: (Struct,) = (Struct{private: /**/()},);
-
-    // Although the struct field is public here, check that it is not
-    // displayed. In a future version of rustdoc, we definitely want to
-    // show it. However for the time being, the printing logic is a bit
-    // conservative.
-    //
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.STRUCT2"]' \
-    //        'const STRUCT2: Record = _'
-    const STRUCT2: Record = Record { public: 5 };
-
-    // Test that we do not show the incredibly verbose match expr:
-    //
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.MATCH0"]' \
-    //        'const MATCH0: i32 = _'
-    const MATCH0: i32 = match 234 {
-        0 => 1,
-        _ => Self::ABSTRACT,
-    };
-
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.MATCH1"]' \
-    //        'const MATCH1: bool = _'
-    const MATCH1: bool = match Self::ABSTRACT {
-        _ => true,
-    };
-
-    // Check that we hide complex (arithmetic) operations.
-    // In this case, it is a bit unfortunate since the expression
-    // is not *that* verbose and it might be quite useful to the reader.
-    //
-    // However in general, the expression might be quite large and
-    // contain match expressions and structs with private fields.
-    // We would need to recurse over the whole expression and even more
-    // importantly respect operator precedence when pretty-printing
-    // the potentially partially censored expression.
-    // For now, the implementation is quite simple and the choices
-    // rather conservative.
-    //
-    // @has - '//*[@id="associatedconstant.ARITH_OPS"]' \
-    //        'const ARITH_OPS: i32 = _'
-    const ARITH_OPS: i32 = Self::ABSTRACT * 2 + 1;
-}
-
-pub struct Struct { private: () }
-
-pub struct Record { pub public: i32 }