1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/half-open-range-patterns/half-open-range-pats-inclusive-dotdotdot-bad-syntax.rs b/src/test/ui/half-open-range-patterns/half-open-range-pats-inclusive-dotdotdot-bad-syntax.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 526a797e9..000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/half-open-range-patterns/half-open-range-pats-inclusive-dotdotdot-bad-syntax.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-// Test that `...X` range-to patterns are syntactically invalid.
-//
-// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67258#issuecomment-565656155
-// for the reason why. To summarize, we might want to introduce `...expr` as
-// an expression form for splatting (or "untupling") in an expression context.
-// While there is no syntactic ambiguity with `...X` in a pattern context,
-// there's a potential confusion factor here, and we would prefer to keep patterns
-// and expressions in-sync. As such, we do not allow `...X` in patterns either.
-
-fn main() {}
-
-#[cfg(FALSE)]
-fn syntax() {
-    match scrutinee {
-        ...X => {} //~ ERROR range-to patterns with `...` are not allowed
-        ...0 => {} //~ ERROR range-to patterns with `...` are not allowed
-        ...'a' => {} //~ ERROR range-to patterns with `...` are not allowed
-        ...0.0f32 => {} //~ ERROR range-to patterns with `...` are not allowed
-    }
-}
-
-fn syntax2() {
-    macro_rules! mac {
-        ($e:expr) => {
-            let ...$e; //~ ERROR range-to patterns with `...` are not allowed
-        }
-    }
-
-    mac!(0);
-}