1 files changed, 0 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/lint/rfc-2383-lint-reason/expect_lint_from_macro.rs b/src/test/ui/lint/rfc-2383-lint-reason/expect_lint_from_macro.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 07c60fa0c..000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/lint/rfc-2383-lint-reason/expect_lint_from_macro.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-// check-pass
-
-#![feature(lint_reasons)]
-
-#![warn(unused_variables)]
-
-macro_rules! trigger_unused_variables_macro {
-    () => {
-        let x = 0;
-        //~^ WARNING unused variable: `x` [unused_variables]
-        //~| WARNING unused variable: `x` [unused_variables]
-    };
-}
-
-pub fn check_macro() {
-    // This should trigger the `unused_variables` from inside the macro
-    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();
-}
-
-// This should be fulfilled by the macro
-#[expect(unused_variables)]
-pub fn check_expect_on_item() {
-    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();
-}
-
-pub fn check_expect_on_macro() {
-    // This should be fulfilled by the macro
-    #[expect(unused_variables)]
-    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();
-
-    // FIXME: Lint attributes currently don't work directly on macros, and
-    // therefore also doesn't work for the new `expect` attribute. This bug
-    // is being tracked in rust#87391. The test will until then produce two
-    // warnings about the unused variable x.
-    //
-    // The expectation is still marked as fulfilled. I'm not totally why but
-    // my guess is that this will remain working when rust#87391 has been fixed.
-}
-
-fn main() {
-
-}