summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs')
-rw-r--r--src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs28
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs b/src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ef89e31d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// check-pass
+
+// Here we check that a `:vis` macro matcher subsititued for the empty visibility
+// (`VisibilityKind::Inherited`) is accepted when used before an enum variant.
+
+fn main() {}
+
+macro_rules! mac_variant {
+ ($vis:vis MARKER) => {
+ enum Enum {
+ $vis Unit,
+
+ $vis Tuple(u8, u16),
+
+ $vis Struct { f: u8 },
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+mac_variant!(MARKER);
+
+// We also accept visibilities on variants syntactically but not semantically.
+#[cfg(FALSE)]
+enum E {
+ pub U,
+ pub(crate) T(u8),
+ pub(super) T { f: String }
+}