summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs')
-rw-r--r--src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs23
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs b/src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a627cbbd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/regions/regions-implied-bounds-projection-gap-3.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// Along with the other tests in this series, illustrates the
+// "projection gap": in this test, we know that `T::Foo: 'x`, and that
+// is (naturally) enough to conclude that `T::Foo: 'x`.
+
+// check-pass
+#![allow(dead_code)]
+#![allow(unused_variables)]
+
+trait Trait1<'x> {
+ type Foo;
+}
+
+// calling this fn should trigger a check that the type argument
+// supplied is well-formed.
+fn wf<T>() { }
+
+fn func<'x, T:Trait1<'x>>(t: &'x T::Foo)
+{
+ wf::<&'x T::Foo>();
+}
+
+
+fn main() { }