1 files changed, 43 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs b/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..98b408daa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// In rustc_typeck::check::expr::no_such_field_err we recursively
+// look in subfields for the field. This recursive search is limited
+// in depth for compile-time reasons and to avoid infinite recursion
+// in case of cycles. This file tests that the limit in the recursion
+// depth is enforced.
+
+struct Foo {
+    first: Bar,
+    second: u32,
+    third: u32,
+}
+
+struct Bar {
+    bar: C,
+}
+
+struct C {
+    c: D,
+}
+
+struct D {
+    test: E,
+}
+
+struct E {
+    e: F,
+}
+
+struct F {
+    f: u32,
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    let f = F { f: 6 };
+    let e = E { e: f };
+    let d = D { test: e };
+    let c = C { c: d };
+    let bar = Bar { bar: c };
+    let fooer = Foo { first: bar, second: 4, third: 5 };
+
+    let test = fooer.f;
+    //~^ ERROR no field
+}