summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs')
-rw-r--r--src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs416
1 files changed, 416 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs b/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..704918c0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/clippy_lints/src/misc_early/mod.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,416 @@
+mod builtin_type_shadow;
+mod double_neg;
+mod literal_suffix;
+mod mixed_case_hex_literals;
+mod redundant_pattern;
+mod unneeded_field_pattern;
+mod unneeded_wildcard_pattern;
+mod zero_prefixed_literal;
+
+use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint;
+use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
+use rustc_ast::ast::{Expr, ExprKind, Generics, Lit, LitFloatType, LitIntType, LitKind, NodeId, Pat, PatKind};
+use rustc_ast::visit::FnKind;
+use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
+use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass, LintContext};
+use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
+use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
+use rustc_span::source_map::Span;
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks for structure field patterns bound to wildcards.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// Using `..` instead is shorter and leaves the focus on
+ /// the fields that are actually bound.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # struct Foo {
+ /// # a: i32,
+ /// # b: i32,
+ /// # c: i32,
+ /// # }
+ /// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 };
+ ///
+ /// match f {
+ /// Foo { a: _, b: 0, .. } => {},
+ /// Foo { a: _, b: _, c: _ } => {},
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # struct Foo {
+ /// # a: i32,
+ /// # b: i32,
+ /// # c: i32,
+ /// # }
+ /// let f = Foo { a: 0, b: 0, c: 0 };
+ ///
+ /// match f {
+ /// Foo { b: 0, .. } => {},
+ /// Foo { .. } => {},
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN,
+ restriction,
+ "struct fields bound to a wildcard instead of using `..`"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks for function arguments having the similar names
+ /// differing by an underscore.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// It affects code readability.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// fn foo(a: i32, _a: i32) {}
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// fn bar(a: i32, _b: i32) {}
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
+ style,
+ "function arguments having names which only differ by an underscore"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Detects expressions of the form `--x`.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// It can mislead C/C++ programmers to think `x` was
+ /// decremented.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// let mut x = 3;
+ /// --x;
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub DOUBLE_NEG,
+ style,
+ "`--x`, which is a double negation of `x` and not a pre-decrement as in C/C++"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Warns on hexadecimal literals with mixed-case letter
+ /// digits.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// It looks confusing.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 0x1a9BAcD
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 0x1A9BACD
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS,
+ style,
+ "hex literals whose letter digits are not consistently upper- or lowercased"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Warns if literal suffixes are not separated by an
+ /// underscore.
+ /// To enforce unseparated literal suffix style,
+ /// see the `separated_literal_suffix` lint.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// Suffix style should be consistent.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 123832i32
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 123832_i32
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
+ restriction,
+ "literals whose suffix is not separated by an underscore"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Warns if literal suffixes are separated by an underscore.
+ /// To enforce separated literal suffix style,
+ /// see the `unseparated_literal_suffix` lint.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// Suffix style should be consistent.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 123832_i32
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let _ =
+ /// 123832i32
+ /// # ;
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "1.58.0"]
+ pub SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
+ restriction,
+ "literals whose suffix is separated by an underscore"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Warns if an integral constant literal starts with `0`.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// In some languages (including the infamous C language
+ /// and most of its
+ /// family), this marks an octal constant. In Rust however, this is a decimal
+ /// constant. This could
+ /// be confusing for both the writer and a reader of the constant.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ ///
+ /// In Rust:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// fn main() {
+ /// let a = 0123;
+ /// println!("{}", a);
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// prints `123`, while in C:
+ ///
+ /// ```c
+ /// #include <stdio.h>
+ ///
+ /// int main() {
+ /// int a = 0123;
+ /// printf("%d\n", a);
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// prints `83` (as `83 == 0o123` while `123 == 0o173`).
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL,
+ complexity,
+ "integer literals starting with `0`"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Warns if a generic shadows a built-in type.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// This gives surprising type errors.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ ///
+ /// ```ignore
+ /// impl<u32> Foo<u32> {
+ /// fn impl_func(&self) -> u32 {
+ /// 42
+ /// }
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW,
+ style,
+ "shadowing a builtin type"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks for patterns in the form `name @ _`.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// It's almost always more readable to just use direct
+ /// bindings.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let v = Some("abc");
+ /// match v {
+ /// Some(x) => (),
+ /// y @ _ => (),
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # let v = Some("abc");
+ /// match v {
+ /// Some(x) => (),
+ /// y => (),
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "pre 1.29.0"]
+ pub REDUNDANT_PATTERN,
+ style,
+ "using `name @ _` in a pattern"
+}
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks for tuple patterns with a wildcard
+ /// pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`).
+ ///
+ /// _NOTE_: While `_, ..` means there is at least one element left, `..`
+ /// means there are 0 or more elements left. This can make a difference
+ /// when refactoring, but shouldn't result in errors in the refactored code,
+ /// since the wildcard pattern isn't used anyway.
+ ///
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// The wildcard pattern is unneeded as the rest pattern
+ /// can match that element as well.
+ ///
+ /// ### Example
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32);
+ /// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3);
+ /// match t {
+ /// TupleStruct(0, .., _) => (),
+ /// _ => (),
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Use instead:
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # struct TupleStruct(u32, u32, u32);
+ /// # let t = TupleStruct(1, 2, 3);
+ /// match t {
+ /// TupleStruct(0, ..) => (),
+ /// _ => (),
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ #[clippy::version = "1.40.0"]
+ pub UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN,
+ complexity,
+ "tuple patterns with a wildcard pattern (`_`) is next to a rest pattern (`..`)"
+}
+
+declare_lint_pass!(MiscEarlyLints => [
+ UNNEEDED_FIELD_PATTERN,
+ DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
+ DOUBLE_NEG,
+ MIXED_CASE_HEX_LITERALS,
+ UNSEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
+ SEPARATED_LITERAL_SUFFIX,
+ ZERO_PREFIXED_LITERAL,
+ BUILTIN_TYPE_SHADOW,
+ REDUNDANT_PATTERN,
+ UNNEEDED_WILDCARD_PATTERN,
+]);
+
+impl EarlyLintPass for MiscEarlyLints {
+ fn check_generics(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, gen: &Generics) {
+ for param in &gen.params {
+ builtin_type_shadow::check(cx, param);
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn check_pat(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, pat: &Pat) {
+ unneeded_field_pattern::check(cx, pat);
+ redundant_pattern::check(cx, pat);
+ unneeded_wildcard_pattern::check(cx, pat);
+ }
+
+ fn check_fn(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, fn_kind: FnKind<'_>, _: Span, _: NodeId) {
+ let mut registered_names: FxHashMap<String, Span> = FxHashMap::default();
+
+ for arg in &fn_kind.decl().inputs {
+ if let PatKind::Ident(_, ident, None) = arg.pat.kind {
+ let arg_name = ident.to_string();
+
+ if let Some(arg_name) = arg_name.strip_prefix('_') {
+ if let Some(correspondence) = registered_names.get(arg_name) {
+ span_lint(
+ cx,
+ DUPLICATE_UNDERSCORE_ARGUMENT,
+ *correspondence,
+ &format!(
+ "`{}` already exists, having another argument having almost the same \
+ name makes code comprehension and documentation more difficult",
+ arg_name
+ ),
+ );
+ }
+ } else {
+ registered_names.insert(arg_name, arg.pat.span);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, expr: &Expr) {
+ if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), expr.span) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if let ExprKind::Lit(ref lit) = expr.kind {
+ MiscEarlyLints::check_lit(cx, lit);
+ }
+ double_neg::check(cx, expr);
+ }
+}
+
+impl MiscEarlyLints {
+ fn check_lit(cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, lit: &Lit) {
+ // We test if first character in snippet is a number, because the snippet could be an expansion
+ // from a built-in macro like `line!()` or a proc-macro like `#[wasm_bindgen]`.
+ // Note that this check also covers special case that `line!()` is eagerly expanded by compiler.
+ // See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4507> for a regression.
+ // FIXME: Find a better way to detect those cases.
+ let lit_snip = match snippet_opt(cx, lit.span) {
+ Some(snip) if snip.chars().next().map_or(false, |c| c.is_ascii_digit()) => snip,
+ _ => return,
+ };
+
+ if let LitKind::Int(value, lit_int_type) = lit.kind {
+ let suffix = match lit_int_type {
+ LitIntType::Signed(ty) => ty.name_str(),
+ LitIntType::Unsigned(ty) => ty.name_str(),
+ LitIntType::Unsuffixed => "",
+ };
+ literal_suffix::check(cx, lit, &lit_snip, suffix, "integer");
+ if lit_snip.starts_with("0x") {
+ mixed_case_hex_literals::check(cx, lit, suffix, &lit_snip);
+ } else if lit_snip.starts_with("0b") || lit_snip.starts_with("0o") {
+ // nothing to do
+ } else if value != 0 && lit_snip.starts_with('0') {
+ zero_prefixed_literal::check(cx, lit, &lit_snip);
+ }
+ } else if let LitKind::Float(_, LitFloatType::Suffixed(float_ty)) = lit.kind {
+ let suffix = float_ty.name_str();
+ literal_suffix::check(cx, lit, &lit_snip, suffix, "float");
+ }
+ }
+}