summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/tools/clippy/src/docs/future_not_send.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--src/tools/clippy/src/docs/future_not_send.txt29
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/src/docs/future_not_send.txt b/src/tools/clippy/src/docs/future_not_send.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0aa048d27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/src/docs/future_not_send.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+### What it does
+This lint requires Future implementations returned from
+functions and methods to implement the `Send` marker trait. It is mostly
+used by library authors (public and internal) that target an audience where
+multithreaded executors are likely to be used for running these Futures.
+
+### Why is this bad?
+A Future implementation captures some state that it
+needs to eventually produce its final value. When targeting a multithreaded
+executor (which is the norm on non-embedded devices) this means that this
+state may need to be transported to other threads, in other words the
+whole Future needs to implement the `Send` marker trait. If it does not,
+then the resulting Future cannot be submitted to a thread pool in the
+end user’s code.
+
+Especially for generic functions it can be confusing to leave the
+discovery of this problem to the end user: the reported error location
+will be far from its cause and can in many cases not even be fixed without
+modifying the library where the offending Future implementation is
+produced.
+
+### Example
+```
+async fn not_send(bytes: std::rc::Rc<[u8]>) {}
+```
+Use instead:
+```
+async fn is_send(bytes: std::sync::Arc<[u8]>) {}
+``` \ No newline at end of file