diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr | 26 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr index 937f85904..6dee4d5b4 100644 --- a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr +++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17 | LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17 | LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more conc LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17 | LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17 | LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17 | LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:22 | LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and mor LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:10 | LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and mor LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:10 | LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51:10 | LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10 | LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more conc LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |