summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/suspicious_operation_groupings.fixed
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/suspicious_operation_groupings.fixed209
1 files changed, 209 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/suspicious_operation_groupings.fixed b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/suspicious_operation_groupings.fixed
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ede8a39fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/suspicious_operation_groupings.fixed
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+// run-rustfix
+#![warn(clippy::suspicious_operation_groupings)]
+#![allow(dead_code, unused_parens, clippy::eq_op)]
+
+struct Vec3 {
+ x: f64,
+ y: f64,
+ z: f64,
+}
+
+impl Eq for Vec3 {}
+
+impl PartialEq for Vec3 {
+ fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
+ // This should trigger the lint because `self.x` is compared to `other.y`
+ self.x == other.x && self.y == other.y && self.z == other.z
+ }
+}
+
+struct S {
+ a: i32,
+ b: i32,
+ c: i32,
+ d: i32,
+}
+
+fn buggy_ab_cmp(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> bool {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ s1.a < s2.a && s1.b < s2.b
+}
+
+struct SaOnly {
+ a: i32,
+}
+
+impl S {
+ fn a(&self) -> i32 {
+ 0
+ }
+}
+
+fn do_not_give_bad_suggestions_for_this_unusual_expr(s1: &S, s2: &SaOnly) -> bool {
+ // This is superficially similar to `buggy_ab_cmp`, but we should not suggest
+ // `s2.b` since that is invalid.
+ s1.a < s2.a && s1.a() < s1.b
+}
+
+fn do_not_give_bad_suggestions_for_this_macro_expr(s1: &S, s2: &SaOnly) -> bool {
+ macro_rules! s1 {
+ () => {
+ S {
+ a: 1,
+ b: 1,
+ c: 1,
+ d: 1,
+ }
+ };
+ }
+
+ // This is superficially similar to `buggy_ab_cmp`, but we should not suggest
+ // `s2.b` since that is invalid.
+ s1.a < s2.a && s1!().a < s1.b
+}
+
+fn do_not_give_bad_suggestions_for_this_incorrect_expr(s1: &S, s2: &SaOnly) -> bool {
+ // There's two `s1.b`, but we should not suggest `s2.b` since that is invalid
+ s1.a < s2.a && s1.b < s1.b
+}
+
+fn permissable(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> bool {
+ // Something like this seems like it might actually be what is desired.
+ s1.a == s2.b
+}
+
+fn non_boolean_operators(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c + s1.d * s2.d
+}
+
+fn odd_number_of_pairs(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.b`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
+}
+
+fn not_caught_by_eq_op_middle_change_left(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
+}
+
+fn not_caught_by_eq_op_middle_change_right(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.b`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
+}
+
+fn not_caught_by_eq_op_start(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.a`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
+}
+
+fn not_caught_by_eq_op_end(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c
+}
+
+fn the_cross_product_should_not_lint(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> (i32, i32, i32) {
+ (
+ s1.b * s2.c - s1.c * s2.b,
+ s1.c * s2.a - s1.a * s2.c,
+ s1.a * s2.b - s1.b * s2.a,
+ )
+}
+
+fn outer_parens_simple(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.b`
+ (s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b)
+}
+
+fn outer_parens(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ (s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b + s1.c * s2.c + s1.d * s2.d)
+}
+
+fn inner_parens(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ (s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.c) + (s1.d * s2.d)
+}
+
+fn outer_and_some_inner_parens(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ ((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.c) + (s1.d * s2.d))
+}
+
+fn all_parens_balanced_tree(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ (((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b)) + ((s1.c * s2.c) + (s1.d * s2.d)))
+}
+
+fn all_parens_left_tree(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ (((s1.a * s2.a) + (s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.c)) + (s1.d * s2.d))
+}
+
+fn all_parens_right_tree(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ ((s1.a * s2.a) + ((s1.b * s2.b) + (s1.c * s2.c) + (s1.d * s2.d)))
+}
+
+fn inside_other_binop_expression(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ (s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b) / 2
+}
+
+fn inside_function_call(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ i32::swap_bytes(s1.a * s2.a + s1.b * s2.b)
+}
+
+fn inside_larger_boolean_expression(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> bool {
+ // There's no `s1.c`
+ s1.a > 0 && s1.b > 0 && s1.c == s2.c && s1.d == s2.d
+}
+
+fn inside_larger_boolean_expression_with_unsorted_ops(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> bool {
+ // There's no `s1.c`
+ s1.a > 0 && s1.c == s2.c && s1.b > 0 && s1.d == s2.d
+}
+
+struct Nested {
+ inner: ((i32,), (i32,), (i32,)),
+}
+
+fn changed_middle_ident(n1: &Nested, n2: &Nested) -> bool {
+ // There's no `n2.inner.2.0`
+ (n1.inner.0).0 == (n2.inner.0).0 && (n1.inner.1).0 == (n2.inner.1).0 && (n1.inner.2).0 == (n2.inner.2).0
+}
+
+// `eq_op` should catch this one.
+fn changed_initial_ident(n1: &Nested, n2: &Nested) -> bool {
+ // There's no `n2.inner.0.0`
+ (n1.inner.0).0 == (n1.inner.0).0 && (n1.inner.1).0 == (n2.inner.1).0 && (n1.inner.2).0 == (n2.inner.2).0
+}
+
+fn inside_fn_with_similar_expression(s1: &S, s2: &S, strict: bool) -> bool {
+ if strict {
+ s1.a < s2.a && s1.b < s2.b
+ } else {
+ // There's no `s1.b` in this subexpression
+ s1.a <= s2.a && s1.b <= s2.b
+ }
+}
+
+fn inside_an_if_statement(s1: &mut S, s2: &S) {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ if s1.a < s2.a && s1.b < s2.b {
+ s1.c = s2.c;
+ }
+}
+
+fn maximum_unary_minus_right_tree(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s2.c`
+ -(-(-s1.a * -s2.a) + (-(-s1.b * -s2.b) + -(-s1.c * -s2.c) + -(-s1.d * -s2.d)))
+}
+
+fn unary_minus_and_an_if_expression(s1: &S, s2: &S) -> i32 {
+ // There's no `s1.b`
+ -(if -s1.a < -s2.a && -s1.b < -s2.b { s1.c } else { s2.a })
+}
+
+fn main() {}