diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/codegen/slice-iter-nonnull.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/codegen/slice-iter-nonnull.rs | 77 |
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/codegen/slice-iter-nonnull.rs b/tests/codegen/slice-iter-nonnull.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..997bdaf56 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/codegen/slice-iter-nonnull.rs @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +// no-system-llvm +// compile-flags: -O +// ignore-debug (these add extra checks that make it hard to verify) +#![crate_type = "lib"] + +// The slice iterator used to `assume` that the `start` pointer was non-null. +// That ought to be unneeded, though, since the type is `NonNull`, so this test +// confirms that the appropriate metadata is included to denote that. + +// CHECK-LABEL: @slice_iter_next( +#[no_mangle] +pub fn slice_iter_next<'a>(it: &mut std::slice::Iter<'a, u32>) -> Option<&'a u32> { + // CHECK: %[[ENDP:.+]] = getelementptr{{.+}}ptr %it,{{.+}} 1 + // CHECK: %[[END:.+]] = load ptr, ptr %[[ENDP]] + // CHECK-SAME: !nonnull + // CHECK-SAME: !noundef + // CHECK: %[[START:.+]] = load ptr, ptr %it, + // CHECK-SAME: !nonnull + // CHECK-SAME: !noundef + // CHECK: icmp eq ptr %[[START]], %[[END]] + + // CHECK: store ptr{{.+}}, ptr %it, + + it.next() +} + +// CHECK-LABEL: @slice_iter_next_back( +#[no_mangle] +pub fn slice_iter_next_back<'a>(it: &mut std::slice::Iter<'a, u32>) -> Option<&'a u32> { + // CHECK: %[[ENDP:.+]] = getelementptr{{.+}}ptr %it,{{.+}} 1 + // CHECK: %[[END:.+]] = load ptr, ptr %[[ENDP]] + // CHECK-SAME: !nonnull + // CHECK-SAME: !noundef + // CHECK: %[[START:.+]] = load ptr, ptr %it, + // CHECK-SAME: !nonnull + // CHECK-SAME: !noundef + // CHECK: icmp eq ptr %[[START]], %[[END]] + + // CHECK: store ptr{{.+}}, ptr %[[ENDP]], + + it.next_back() +} + +// The slice iterator `new` methods used to `assume` that the pointer is non-null, +// but passing slices already requires that, to the extent that LLVM actually +// removed the `call @llvm.assume` anyway. These tests just demonstrate that the +// attribute is there, and confirms adding the assume back doesn't do anything. + +// CHECK-LABEL: @slice_iter_new +// CHECK-SAME: (ptr noalias noundef nonnull {{.+}} %slice.0, {{.+}} noundef %slice.1) +#[no_mangle] +pub fn slice_iter_new(slice: &[u32]) -> std::slice::Iter<'_, u32> { + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: %[[END:.+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32{{.+}} %slice.0{{.+}} %slice.1 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: insertvalue {{.+}} ptr %slice.0, 0 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: insertvalue {{.+}} ptr %[[END]], 1 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: } + slice.iter() +} + +// CHECK-LABEL: @slice_iter_mut_new +// CHECK-SAME: (ptr noalias noundef nonnull {{.+}} %slice.0, {{.+}} noundef %slice.1) +#[no_mangle] +pub fn slice_iter_mut_new(slice: &mut [u32]) -> std::slice::IterMut<'_, u32> { + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: %[[END:.+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32{{.+}} %slice.0{{.+}} %slice.1 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: insertvalue {{.+}} ptr %slice.0, 0 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: insertvalue {{.+}} ptr %[[END]], 1 + // CHECK-NOT: slice + // CHECK: } + slice.iter_mut() +} |