From 2e00214b3efbdfeefaa0fe9e8b8fd519de7adc35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:50 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 1.69.0+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- library/core/src/cmp/bytewise.rs | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) create mode 100644 library/core/src/cmp/bytewise.rs (limited to 'library/core/src/cmp') diff --git a/library/core/src/cmp/bytewise.rs b/library/core/src/cmp/bytewise.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2548d9e24 --- /dev/null +++ b/library/core/src/cmp/bytewise.rs @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +use crate::num::{NonZeroI128, NonZeroI16, NonZeroI32, NonZeroI64, NonZeroI8, NonZeroIsize}; +use crate::num::{NonZeroU128, NonZeroU16, NonZeroU32, NonZeroU64, NonZeroU8, NonZeroUsize}; + +/// Types where `==` & `!=` are equivalent to comparing their underlying bytes. +/// +/// Importantly, this means no floating-point types, as those have different +/// byte representations (like `-0` and `+0`) which compare as the same. +/// Since byte arrays are `Eq`, that implies that these types are probably also +/// `Eq`, but that's not technically required to use this trait. +/// +/// `Rhs` is *de facto* always `Self`, but the separate parameter is important +/// to avoid the `specializing impl repeats parameter` error when consuming this. +/// +/// # Safety +/// +/// - `Self` and `Rhs` have no padding. +/// - `Self` and `Rhs` have the same layout (size and alignment). +/// - Neither `Self` nor `Rhs` have provenance, so integer comparisons are correct. +/// - `>::{eq,ne}` are equivalent to comparing the bytes. +#[rustc_specialization_trait] +pub(crate) unsafe trait BytewiseEq: PartialEq + Sized {} + +macro_rules! is_bytewise_comparable { + ($($t:ty),+ $(,)?) => {$( + unsafe impl BytewiseEq for $t {} + )+}; +} + +// SAFETY: All the ordinary integer types have no padding, and are not pointers. +is_bytewise_comparable!(u8, u16, u32, u64, u128, usize, i8, i16, i32, i64, i128, isize); + +// SAFETY: These have *niches*, but no *padding* and no *provenance*, +// so we can compare them directly. +is_bytewise_comparable!(bool, char, super::Ordering); + +// SAFETY: Similarly, the non-zero types have a niche, but no undef and no pointers, +// and they compare like their underlying numeric type. +is_bytewise_comparable!( + NonZeroU8, + NonZeroU16, + NonZeroU32, + NonZeroU64, + NonZeroU128, + NonZeroUsize, + NonZeroI8, + NonZeroI16, + NonZeroI32, + NonZeroI64, + NonZeroI128, + NonZeroIsize, +); + +// SAFETY: The NonZero types have the "null" optimization guaranteed, and thus +// are also safe to equality-compare bitwise inside an `Option`. +// The way `PartialOrd` is defined for `Option` means that this wouldn't work +// for `<` or `>` on the signed types, but since we only do `==` it's fine. +is_bytewise_comparable!( + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, + Option, +); + +macro_rules! is_bytewise_comparable_array_length { + ($($n:literal),+ $(,)?) => {$( + // SAFETY: Arrays have no padding between elements, so if the elements are + // `BytewiseEq`, then the whole array can be too. + unsafe impl, U> BytewiseEq<[U; $n]> for [T; $n] {} + )+}; +} + +// Frustratingly, this can't be made const-generic as it gets +// error: specializing impl repeats parameter `N` +// so just do it for a couple of plausibly-common ones. +is_bytewise_comparable_array_length!(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64); -- cgit v1.2.3