From 698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs

(limited to 'src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs')

diff --git a/src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs b/src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c08e05c8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-pass.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// run-pass
+
+trait Tr {
+    const A: u8 = 255;
+
+    // This should not be a constant evaluation error (overflow). The value of
+    // `Self::A` must not be assumed to hold inside the trait.
+    const B: u8 = Self::A + 1;
+}
+
+// An impl that doesn't override any constant will NOT cause a const eval error
+// just because it's defined, but only if the bad constant is used anywhere.
+// This matches the behavior without defaults.
+impl Tr for () {}
+
+// An impl that overrides either constant with a suitable value will be fine.
+impl Tr for u8 {
+    const A: u8 = 254;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u16 {
+    const B: u8 = 0;
+}
+
+impl Tr for u32 {
+    const A: u8 = 254;
+    const B: u8 = 0;
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::A, 255);
+    //assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);  // using this is an error
+
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::A, 254);
+    assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::B, 255);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::A, 255);
+    assert_eq!(<u16 as Tr>::B, 0);
+
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::A, 254);
+    assert_eq!(<u32 as Tr>::B, 0);
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3