From 218caa410aa38c29984be31a5229b9fa717560ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:13 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 1.68.2+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs | 19 ------------------- 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/test/ui/borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs (limited to 'src/test/ui/borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs') diff --git a/src/test/ui/borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs b/src/test/ui/borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs deleted file mode 100644 index dd2ef4e27..000000000 --- a/src/test/ui/borrowck/two-phase-cannot-nest-mut-self-calls.rs +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -// This is the third counter-example from Niko's blog post -// smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2017/03/01/nested-method-calls-via-two-phase-borrowing/ -// -// It shows that not all nested method calls on `self` are magically -// allowed by this change. In particular, a nested `&mut` borrow is -// still disallowed. - -fn main() { - - - let mut vec = vec![0, 1]; - vec.get({ - - vec.push(2); - //~^ ERROR cannot borrow `vec` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable - - 0 - }); -} -- cgit v1.2.3