From 218caa410aa38c29984be31a5229b9fa717560ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:13 +0200
Subject: Merging upstream version 1.68.2+dfsg1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs          | 57 ----------------------
 1 file changed, 57 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs

(limited to 'src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs')

diff --git a/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs b/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index 472f6b5c8..000000000
--- a/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-// Under the 2015 edition with the keyword_idents lint, `dyn` is
-// not entirely acceptable as an identifier.
-//
-// We currently do not attempt to detect or fix uses of `dyn` as an
-// identifier under a macro.
-//
-// check-pass
-// edition:2015
-
-#![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
-#![deny(keyword_idents)]
-
-mod outer_mod {
-    pub mod r#dyn {
-        pub struct r#dyn;
-    }
-}
-
-// Here we are illustrating that the current lint does not flag the
-// occurrences of `dyn` in this macro definition; however, it
-// certainly *could* (and it would be nice if it did), since these
-// occurrences are not compatible with the 2018 edition's
-// interpretation of `dyn` as a keyword.
-macro_rules! defn_has_dyn_idents {
-    () => { ::outer_mod::dyn::dyn }
-}
-
-struct X;
-trait Trait { fn hello(&self) { }}
-impl Trait for X { }
-
-macro_rules! tt_trait {
-    ($arg:tt) => { & $arg Trait }
-}
-
-macro_rules! id_trait {
-    ($id:ident) => { & $id Trait }
-}
-
-fn main() {
-    defn_has_dyn_idents!();
-
-    // Here we are illustrating that the current lint does not flag
-    // the occurrences of `dyn` in these macro invocations. It
-    // definitely should *not* flag the one in `tt_trait`, since that
-    // is expanding in a valid fashion to `&dyn Trait`.
-    //
-    // It is arguable whether it would be valid to flag the occurrence
-    // in `id_trait`, since that macro specifies that it takes an
-    // `ident` as its input.
-    fn f_tt(x: &X) -> tt_trait!(dyn) { x }
-    fn f_id(x: &X) -> id_trait!(dyn) { x }
-
-    let x = X;
-    f_tt(&x).hello();
-    f_id(&x).hello();
-}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3