From 698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/test/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs (limited to 'src/test/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs') diff --git a/src/test/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs b/src/test/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3ad548450 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/issue-59311.rs @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +// Regression test for #59311. The test is taken from +// rust-lang/rust/issues/71546#issuecomment-620638437 +// as they seem to have the same cause. + +// FIXME: It's not clear that this code ought to report +// an error, but the regression test is here to ensure +// that it does not ICE. See discussion on #74889 for details. + +pub trait T { + fn t(&self, _: F) {} +} + +pub fn crash(v: &V) +where + for<'a> &'a V: T + 'static, +{ + v.t(|| {}); + //~^ ERROR: higher-ranked lifetime error + //~| ERROR: higher-ranked lifetime error +} + +fn main() {} -- cgit v1.2.3