From 20431706a863f92cb37dc512fef6e48d192aaf2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:11:38 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 1.66.0+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs') diff --git a/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs b/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs index 98b408daa..a7a3f9818 100644 --- a/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs +++ b/src/test/ui/suggestions/non-existent-field-present-in-subfield-recursion-limit.rs @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// In rustc_typeck::check::expr::no_such_field_err we recursively +// In rustc_hir_analysis::check::expr::no_such_field_err we recursively // look in subfields for the field. This recursive search is limited // in depth for compile-time reasons and to avoid infinite recursion // in case of cycles. This file tests that the limit in the recursion -- cgit v1.2.3