From 4e8199b572f2035b7749cba276ece3a26630d23e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:21 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1.67.1+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.rs | 21 +++++++++++--- .../tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.stderr | 32 +++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used') diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.rs b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.rs index 0e82fb20e..bc8e8c1f0 100644 --- a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.rs +++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.rs @@ -66,8 +66,21 @@ fn main() { } } -#[test] -fn test() { - let boxed_slice: Box<[u8]> = Box::new([0, 1, 2, 3]); - let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); +#[cfg(test)] +mod issue9612 { + // should not lint in `#[cfg(test)]` modules + #[test] + fn test_fn() { + let _a: u8 = 2.try_into().unwrap(); + let _a: u8 = 3.try_into().expect(""); + + util(); + } + + fn util() { + let _a: u8 = 4.try_into().unwrap(); + let _a: u8 = 5.try_into().expect(""); + // should still warn + let _ = Box::new([0]).get(1).unwrap(); + } } diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.stderr b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.stderr index 681b5eaf5..94b5ef663 100644 --- a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.stderr +++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui-toml/unwrap_used/unwrap_used.stderr @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:35:17 | LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:36:17 | LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more conc LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:37:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:38:17 | LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:39:17 | LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:40:17 | LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:44:22 | LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and mor LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:49:10 | LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and mor LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:50:10 | LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:51:10 | LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:52:10 | LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more conc LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:64:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` -error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value +error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:65:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); @@ -188,10 +188,10 @@ LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise - --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:72:13 + --> $DIR/unwrap_used.rs:84:17 | -LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]` +LL | let _ = Box::new([0]).get(1).unwrap(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&Box::new([0])[1]` error: aborting due to 27 previous errors -- cgit v1.2.3