From 698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 174 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr (limited to 'src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr') diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..96e5a1544 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/floating_point_log.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:10:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(2f32); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.log2()` + | + = note: `-D clippy::suboptimal-flops` implied by `-D warnings` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:11:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(10f32); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.log10()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:12:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(std::f32::consts::E); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:13:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(TWO); + | ^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.log2()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:14:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(E); + | ^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:17:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(2f64); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.log2()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:18:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(10f64); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.log10()` + +error: logarithm for bases 2, 10 and e can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:19:13 + | +LL | let _ = x.log(std::f64::consts::E); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:24:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1f32 + 2.).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `2.0f32.ln_1p()` + | + = note: `-D clippy::imprecise-flops` implied by `-D warnings` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:25:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1f32 + 2.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `2.0f32.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:26:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:27:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x / 2.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x / 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:28:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x.powi(3)).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:29:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x.powi(3) / 2.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x.powi(3) / 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:30:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + (std::f32::consts::E - 1.0)).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(std::f32::consts::E - 1.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:31:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:32:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x.powi(3) + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:33:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x + 2.0 + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x + 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:34:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x / 2.0 + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x / 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:42:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1f64 + 2.).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `2.0f64.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:43:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1f64 + 2.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `2.0f64.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:44:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:45:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x / 2.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x / 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:46:13 + | +LL | let _ = (1.0 + x.powi(3)).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:47:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:48:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x.powi(3) + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:49:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x + 2.0 + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x + 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: ln(1 + x) can be computed more accurately + --> $DIR/floating_point_log.rs:50:13 + | +LL | let _ = (x / 2.0 + 1.0).ln(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x / 2.0).ln_1p()` + +error: aborting due to 28 previous errors + -- cgit v1.2.3