From 698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:02:58 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed   | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed

(limited to 'src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed')

diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ba9d15e59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/needless_question_mark.fixed
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+// run-rustfix
+
+#![warn(clippy::needless_question_mark)]
+#![allow(
+    clippy::needless_return,
+    clippy::unnecessary_unwrap,
+    clippy::upper_case_acronyms,
+    dead_code,
+    unused_must_use
+)]
+#![feature(custom_inner_attributes)]
+
+struct TO {
+    magic: Option<usize>,
+}
+
+struct TR {
+    magic: Result<usize, bool>,
+}
+
+fn simple_option_bad1(to: TO) -> Option<usize> {
+    // return as a statement
+    return to.magic;
+}
+
+// formatting will add a semi-colon, which would make
+// this identical to the test case above
+#[rustfmt::skip]
+fn simple_option_bad2(to: TO) -> Option<usize> {
+    // return as an expression
+    return to.magic
+}
+
+fn simple_option_bad3(to: TO) -> Option<usize> {
+    // block value "return"
+    to.magic
+}
+
+fn simple_option_bad4(to: Option<TO>) -> Option<usize> {
+    // single line closure
+    to.and_then(|t| t.magic)
+}
+
+// formatting this will remove the block brackets, making
+// this test identical to the one above
+#[rustfmt::skip]
+fn simple_option_bad5(to: Option<TO>) -> Option<usize> {
+    // closure with body
+    to.and_then(|t| {
+        t.magic
+    })
+}
+
+fn simple_result_bad1(tr: TR) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    return tr.magic;
+}
+
+// formatting will add a semi-colon, which would make
+// this identical to the test case above
+#[rustfmt::skip]
+fn simple_result_bad2(tr: TR) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    return tr.magic
+}
+
+fn simple_result_bad3(tr: TR) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    tr.magic
+}
+
+fn simple_result_bad4(tr: Result<TR, bool>) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    tr.and_then(|t| t.magic)
+}
+
+// formatting this will remove the block brackets, making
+// this test identical to the one above
+#[rustfmt::skip]
+fn simple_result_bad5(tr: Result<TR, bool>) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    tr.and_then(|t| {
+        t.magic
+    })
+}
+
+fn also_bad(tr: Result<TR, bool>) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    if tr.is_ok() {
+        let t = tr.unwrap();
+        return t.magic;
+    }
+    Err(false)
+}
+
+fn false_positive_test<U, T>(x: Result<(), U>) -> Result<(), T>
+where
+    T: From<U>,
+{
+    Ok(x?)
+}
+
+// not quite needless
+fn deref_ref(s: Option<&String>) -> Option<&str> {
+    Some(s?)
+}
+
+fn main() {}
+
+// #6921 if a macro wraps an expr in Some(  ) and the ? is in the macro use,
+// the suggestion fails to apply; do not lint
+macro_rules! some_in_macro {
+    ($expr:expr) => {
+        || -> _ { Some($expr) }()
+    };
+}
+
+pub fn test1() {
+    let x = Some(3);
+    let _x = some_in_macro!(x?);
+}
+
+// this one is ok because both the ? and the Some are both inside the macro def
+macro_rules! some_and_qmark_in_macro {
+    ($expr:expr) => {
+        || -> Option<_> { Some($expr) }()
+    };
+}
+
+pub fn test2() {
+    let x = Some(3);
+    let _x = some_and_qmark_in_macro!(x?);
+}
+
+async fn async_option_bad(to: TO) -> Option<usize> {
+    let _ = Some(3);
+    to.magic
+}
+
+async fn async_deref_ref(s: Option<&String>) -> Option<&str> {
+    Some(s?)
+}
+
+async fn async_result_bad(s: TR) -> Result<usize, bool> {
+    s.magic
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3