From 218caa410aa38c29984be31a5229b9fa717560ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:13 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 1.68.2+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs (limited to 'tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs') diff --git a/tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs b/tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ef89e31d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/parser/issues/issue-65041-empty-vis-matcher-in-enum.rs @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// check-pass + +// Here we check that a `:vis` macro matcher subsititued for the empty visibility +// (`VisibilityKind::Inherited`) is accepted when used before an enum variant. + +fn main() {} + +macro_rules! mac_variant { + ($vis:vis MARKER) => { + enum Enum { + $vis Unit, + + $vis Tuple(u8, u16), + + $vis Struct { f: u8 }, + } + } +} + +mac_variant!(MARKER); + +// We also accept visibilities on variants syntactically but not semantically. +#[cfg(FALSE)] +enum E { + pub U, + pub(crate) T(u8), + pub(super) T { f: String } +} -- cgit v1.2.3