From dc0db358abe19481e475e10c32149b53370f1a1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 05:57:31 +0200
Subject: Merging upstream version 1.72.1+dfsg1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../trait-where-clause-const.rs                    | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/trait-where-clause-const.rs

(limited to 'tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/trait-where-clause-const.rs')

diff --git a/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/trait-where-clause-const.rs b/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/trait-where-clause-const.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bfe98b98c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2632-const-trait-impl/trait-where-clause-const.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// Like trait-where-clause.rs, but we are calling from a const context.
+// Checking the validity of traits' where clauses happen at a later stage.
+// (`rustc_const_eval` instead of `rustc_hir_analysis`) Therefore one file as a
+// test is not enough.
+#![feature(const_trait_impl)]
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Bar {}
+
+#[const_trait]
+trait Foo {
+    fn a();
+    fn b() where Self: ~const Bar;
+    fn c<T: ~const Bar>();
+}
+
+const fn test1<T: ~const Foo + Bar>() {
+    T::a();
+    T::b();
+    //~^ ERROR the trait bound
+    T::c::<T>();
+    //~^ ERROR the trait bound
+}
+
+const fn test2<T: ~const Foo + ~const Bar>() {
+    T::a();
+    T::b();
+    T::c::<T>();
+}
+
+fn main() {}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3