From 64d98f8ee037282c35007b64c2649055c56af1db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:03 +0200 Subject: Merging upstream version 1.68.2+dfsg1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs (limited to 'tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs') diff --git a/tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs b/tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e738b1847 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/union/union-fields-2.rs @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// revisions: mirunsafeck thirunsafeck +// [thirunsafeck]compile-flags: -Z thir-unsafeck + +union U { + a: u8, + b: u16, +} + +fn main() { + let u = U {}; //~ ERROR union expressions should have exactly one field + let u = U { a: 0 }; // OK + let u = U { a: 0, b: 1 }; //~ ERROR union expressions should have exactly one field + let u = U { a: 0, b: 1, c: 2 }; //~ ERROR union expressions should have exactly one field + //~^ ERROR union `U` has no field named `c` + let u = U { ..u }; //~ ERROR union expressions should have exactly one field + //~^ ERROR functional record update syntax requires a struct + + let U {} = u; //~ ERROR union patterns should have exactly one field + let U { a } = u; // OK + let U { a, b } = u; //~ ERROR union patterns should have exactly one field + let U { a, b, c } = u; //~ ERROR union patterns should have exactly one field + //~^ ERROR union `U` does not have a field named `c` + let U { .. } = u; //~ ERROR union patterns should have exactly one field + //~^ ERROR `..` cannot be used in union patterns + let U { a, .. } = u; //~ ERROR `..` cannot be used in union patterns +} -- cgit v1.2.3