blob: 8e8324b30f0fb02cac16001c22685a7205a48e56 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
|
//! This file tests for the `DOC_MARKDOWN` lint, specifically cases
//! where ticks are unbalanced (see issue #6753).
#![allow(dead_code)]
#![warn(clippy::doc_markdown)]
/// This is a doc comment with `unbalanced_tick marks and several words that
/// should be `encompassed_by` tick marks because they `contain_underscores`.
/// Because of the initial `unbalanced_tick` pair, the error message is
/// very `confusing_and_misleading`.
fn main() {}
/// This paragraph has `unbalanced_tick marks and should stop_linting.
///
/// This paragraph is fine and should_be linted normally.
///
/// Double unbalanced backtick from ``here to here` should lint.
///
/// Double balanced back ticks ``start end`` is fine.
fn multiple_paragraphs() {}
/// ```
/// // Unbalanced tick mark in code block shouldn't warn:
/// `
/// ```
fn in_code_block() {}
/// # `Fine`
///
/// ## not_fine
///
/// ### `unbalanced
///
/// - This `item has unbalanced tick marks
/// - This item needs backticks_here
fn other_markdown() {}
#[rustfmt::skip]
/// - ```rust
/// /// `lol`
/// pub struct Struct;
/// ```
fn iss_7421() {}
|
