summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs
blob: 9d5af356183cde7875f69aef72ca78ad2a84fde0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
#![cfg(test)]

use crate::Iteration;
use crate::Relation;
use crate::RelationLeaper;
use proptest::prelude::*;
use proptest::{proptest, proptest_helper};

fn inputs() -> impl Strategy<Value = Vec<(u32, u32)>> {
    prop::collection::vec((0_u32..100, 0_u32..100), 1..500)
}

/// The original way to use datafrog -- computes reachable nodes from a set of edges
fn reachable_with_var_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
    let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
    let mut iteration = Iteration::new();

    let edges_by_successor = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("edges_invert");
    edges_by_successor.extend(edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)));

    let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
    reachable.insert(edges);

    while iteration.changed() {
        // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
        reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3));
    }

    reachable.complete()
}

/// Like `reachable`, but using a relation as an input to `from_join`
fn reachable_with_relation_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
    let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
    let mut iteration = Iteration::new();

    // NB. Changed from `reachable_with_var_join`:
    let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect();

    let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
    reachable.insert(edges);

    while iteration.changed() {
        // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
        reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3));
    }

    reachable.complete()
}

fn reachable_with_leapfrog(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
    let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
    let mut iteration = Iteration::new();

    let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect();

    let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
    reachable.insert(edges);

    while iteration.changed() {
        // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
        reachable.from_leapjoin(
            &reachable,
            edges_by_successor.extend_with(|&(n2, _)| n2),
            |&(_, n3), &n1| (n1, n3),
        );
    }

    reachable.complete()
}

/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration
/// variables (the original datafrog technique).
fn sum_join_via_var(
    input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
    input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
    let mut iteration = Iteration::new();

    let input1 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1");
    input1.extend(input1_slice);

    let input2 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1");
    input2.extend(input2_slice);

    let output = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("output");

    while iteration.changed() {
        // output(K1, V1 * 100 + V2) :- input1(K1, V1), input2(K1, V2).
        output.from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2));
    }

    output.complete()
}

/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration
/// variables (the original datafrog technique).
fn sum_join_via_relation(
    input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
    input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
    let input1: Relation<_> = input1_slice.iter().collect();
    let input2: Relation<_> = input2_slice.iter().collect();
    Relation::from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2))
}

proptest! {
    #[test]
    fn reachable_leapfrog_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) {
        let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges);
        let reachable2 = reachable_with_leapfrog(&edges);
        assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements);
    }

    #[test]
    fn reachable_rel_join_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) {
        let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges);
        let reachable2 = reachable_with_relation_join(&edges);
        assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements);
    }

    #[test]
    fn sum_join_from_var_vs_rel((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
        let output1 = sum_join_via_var(&set1, &set2);
        let output2 = sum_join_via_relation(&set1, &set2);
        assert_eq!(output1.elements, output2.elements);
    }

    /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a
    /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes an "intersection"
    /// operation.
    #[test]
    fn filter_with_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
        let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect();
        let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect();
        let intersection1 = Relation::from_leapjoin(
            &input1,
            input2.filter_with(|&tuple| tuple),
            |&tuple, &()| tuple,
        );

        let intersection2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter()
            .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_ok())
            .collect();

        assert_eq!(intersection1.elements, intersection2.elements);
    }

    /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a
    /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes a "set minus" operation.
    #[test]
    fn filter_anti_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
        let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect();
        let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect();

        let difference1 = Relation::from_leapjoin(
            &input1,
            input2.filter_anti(|&tuple| tuple),
            |&tuple, &()| tuple,
        );

        let difference2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter()
            .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_err())
            .collect();

        assert_eq!(difference1.elements, difference2.elements);
    }
}

/// Test that `from_leapjoin` matches against the tuples from an
/// `extend` that precedes first iteration.
///
/// This was always true, but wasn't immediately obvious to me until I
/// re-read the code more carefully. -nikomatsakis
#[test]
fn leapjoin_from_extend() {
    let doubles: Relation<(u32, u32)> = (0..10).map(|i| (i, i * 2)).collect();

    let mut iteration = Iteration::new();

    let variable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("variable");
    variable.extend(Some((2, 2)));

    while iteration.changed() {
        variable.from_leapjoin(
            &variable,
            doubles.extend_with(|&(i, _)| i),
            |&(i, _), &j| (i, j),
        );
    }

    let variable = variable.complete();

    assert_eq!(variable.elements, vec![(2, 2), (2, 4)]);
}