Merging upstream version 7.4.7.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

4 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/js/roots/titles/conf.py b/tests/js/roots/titles/conf.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e5f6bb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/js/roots/titles/conf.py
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+import os
+import sys
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('.'))
+
+extensions = ['sphinx.ext.autodoc']
diff --git a/tests/js/roots/titles/index.rst b/tests/js/roots/titles/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..464cd95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/js/roots/titles/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Main Page
+=========
+
+This is the main page of the ``titles`` test project.
+
+In particular, this test project is intended to demonstrate how Sphinx
+can handle scoring of query matches against document titles and subsection
+heading titles relative to other document matches such as terms found within
+document text and object names extracted from code.
+
+Relevance
+---------
+
+In the context of search engines, we can say that a document is **relevant**
+to a user's query when it contains information that seems likely to help them
+find an answer to a question they're asking, or to improve their knowledge of
+the subject area they're researching.
+
+.. automodule:: relevance
+   :members:
diff --git a/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.py b/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4d0eec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.py
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+class Example:
+    """Example class"""
+    num_attribute = 5
+    text_attribute = "string"
+
+    relevance = "testing"
+    """attribute docstring"""
diff --git a/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.rst b/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18f494f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/js/roots/titles/relevance.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+Relevance
+=========
+
+In some domains, it can be straightforward to determine whether a search result
+is relevant to the user's query.
+
+For example, if we are in a software programming language domain, and a user
+has issued a query for the term ``printf``, then we could consider a document
+in the corpus that describes a built-in language function with the same name
+as (highly) relevant.  A document that only happens to mention the ``printf``
+function name as part of some example code that appears on the page would
+also be relevant, but likely less relevant than the one that describes the
+function itself in detail.