Adding upstream version 3.45.1.upstream/3.45.1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 520 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/in4.test b/test/in4.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a3fe22e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/in4.test
@@ -0,0 +1,520 @@
+# 2008 September 1
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+#    May you do good and not evil.
+#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+#
+# $Id: in4.test,v 1.4 2009/06/05 17:09:12 drh Exp $
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+set testprefix in4
+
+do_test in4-1.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
+    CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
+  }
+} {}
+do_test in4-1.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
+  }
+} {}
+do_test in4-1.3 {
+  execsql {
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('aaa', 1);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ddd', 2);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ccc', 3);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('eee', 4);
+    SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
+  }
+} {1 3}
+do_test in4-1.4 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN (1, 3);
+  }
+} {aaa ccc}
+do_test in4-1.5 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN ();
+  }
+} {}
+do_test in4-1.6 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('ddd');
+  }
+} {ddd}
+
+do_test in4-2.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t2(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(-1, '-one');
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, 'zero');
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'one');
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'two');
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, 'three');
+  }
+} {}
+
+do_test in4-2.2 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (0, 2) }
+} {zero two}
+
+do_test in4-2.3 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, 0) }
+} {zero two}
+
+do_test in4-2.4 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, -1) }
+} {-one two}
+
+do_test in4-2.5 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (NULL, 3) }
+} {three}
+
+do_test in4-2.6 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (1.0, 2.1) }
+} {one}
+
+do_test in4-2.7 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('1', '2') }
+} {one two}
+
+do_test in4-2.8 {
+  execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('', '0.0.0', '2') }
+} {two}
+
+# The following block of tests test expressions of the form:
+#
+#    <expr> IN ()
+#
+# i.e. IN expressions with a literal empty set. 
+# 
+# This has led to crashes on more than one occasion. Test case in4-3.2 
+# was added in reponse to a bug reported on the mailing list on 11/7/2008.
+# See also tickets #3602 and #185.
+#
+do_test in4-3.1 {
+  execsql {
+    DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
+    DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
+    CREATE TABLE t1(x, id);
+    CREATE TABLE t2(x, id);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, NULL);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 4);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 5);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 6);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, NULL);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 1);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, 1);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
+  }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT x FROM t1 WHERE id IN () AND x IN (SELECT x FROM t2 WHERE id=1)
+  }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.3 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t3(x, y, z);
+    CREATE INDEX t3i1 ON t3(x, y);
+    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 1, 1);
+    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(10, 10, 10);
+  }
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.4 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x = 10 AND y IN () }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.5 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () AND y = 10 }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.6 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () OR x = 10 }
+} {10 10 10}
+do_test in4-3.7 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE y IN () }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.8 {
+  execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE a }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.9 {
+  execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE NOT a }
+} {0 0}
+do_test in4-3.10 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE oid IN () }
+} {}
+do_test in4-3.11 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) OR y IN ()}
+} {1 1 1}
+do_test in4-3.12 {
+  execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) AND y IN ()}
+} {}
+
+# Tests for "... IN (?)" and "... NOT IN (?)".  In other words, tests
+# for when the RHS of IN is a single expression.  This should work the
+# same as the == and <> operators.
+#
+do_execsql_test in4-3.21 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=10 AND y IN (10);
+} {10 10 10}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.22 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y=10;
+} {10 10 10}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.23 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y IN (10);
+} {10 10 10}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.24 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=1 AND y NOT IN (10);
+} {1 1 1}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.25 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x  NOT IN (10) AND y=1;
+} {1 1 1}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.26 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10) AND y NOT IN (10);
+} {1 1 1}
+
+# The query planner recognizes that "x IN (?)" only generates a
+# single match and can use this information to optimize-out ORDER BY
+# clauses.
+#
+do_execsql_test in4-3.31 {
+  DROP INDEX t3i1;
+  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t3xy ON t3(x,y);
+
+  SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
+   WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
+     AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
+} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.32 {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
+   WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
+     AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
+} {~/B-TREE/}  ;# No separate sorting pass
+do_execsql_test in4-3.33 {
+  SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
+   WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
+     AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
+} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.34 {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
+   WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
+     AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
+} {~/B-TREE/}  ;# No separate sorting pass
+
+# An expression of the form "x IN (?,?)" creates an ephemeral table to
+# hold the list of values on the RHS.  But "x IN (?)" does not create
+# an ephemeral table.
+#
+do_execsql_test in4-3.41 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
+} {10 10 10}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.42 {
+  EXPLAIN
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
+} {/OpenEphemeral/}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.43 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
+} {10 10 10}
+
+# This test would verify that the "X IN (Y)" -> "X==Y" optimization
+# was working.  But we have now taken that optimization out.
+#do_execsql_test in4-3.44 {
+#  EXPLAIN
+#  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
+#} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.45 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
+} {1 1 1}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.46 {
+  EXPLAIN
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
+} {/OpenEphemeral/}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.47 {
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
+} {1 1 1}
+do_execsql_test in4-3.48 {
+  EXPLAIN
+  SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
+} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
+
+# Make sure that when "x IN (?)" is converted into "x==?" that collating
+# sequence and affinity computations do not get messed up.
+#
+do_execsql_test in4-4.1 {
+  CREATE TABLE t4a(a TEXT, b TEXT COLLATE nocase, c);
+  INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ABC','abc',1);
+  INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('def','xyz',2);
+  INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ghi','ghi',3);
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a=b ORDER BY c;
+} {3}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.2 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE b=a ORDER BY c;
+} {1 3}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.3 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=b ORDER BY c;
+} {1 3}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.4 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=(b||'') ORDER BY c;
+} {3}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.5 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a IN (b) ORDER BY c;
+} {3}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.6 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'') IN (b) ORDER BY c;
+} {3}
+
+
+do_execsql_test in4-4.11 {
+  CREATE TABLE t4b(a TEXT, b NUMERIC, c);
+  INSERT INTO t4b VALUES('1.0',1,4);
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=b;
+} {4}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.12 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=a;
+} {4}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.13 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +a=b;
+} {4}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.14 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=+b;
+} {}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.15 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b=a;
+} {}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.16 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=+a;
+} {4}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.17 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a IN (b);
+} {}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.18 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b IN (a);
+} {4}
+do_execsql_test in4-4.19 {
+  SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b IN (a);
+} {}
+
+do_execsql_test in4-5.1 {
+  CREATE TABLE t5(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d TEXT COLLATE nocase);
+  INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(17, 'fuzz');
+  SELECT 1 FROM t5 WHERE 'fuzz' IN (d);  -- match
+  SELECT 2 FROM t5 WHERE 'FUZZ' IN (d);  -- no match
+  SELECT 3 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('fuzz');  -- match
+  SELECT 4 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('FUZZ');  -- match
+} {1 3 4}
+
+# An expression of the form "x IN (y)" can be used as "x=y" by the
+# query planner when computing transitive constraints or to run the
+# query using an index on y.
+#
+do_execsql_test in4-6.1 {
+  CREATE TABLE t6a(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
+  INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(1,2),(3,4),(5,6);
+  CREATE TABLE t6b(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d);
+  INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(4,44),(5,55),(6,66);
+
+  SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
+} {3 4 4 44}
+do_execsql_test in4-6.1-eqp {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
+} {~/SCAN t6a/}
+do_execsql_test in4-6.2 {
+  SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
+} {3 4 4 44}
+do_execsql_test in4-6.2-eqp {
+  EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
+  SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
+} {~/SCAN/}
+
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 7.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
+  CREATE TABLE t2(d, e);
+  CREATE INDEX t1bc ON t1(c, b);
+  INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+do_execsql_test 7.1 {
+  SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c = d AND b IN (10,10,10);
+} {{} 1 {} {} {}}
+
+ifcapable rtree {
+  reset_db
+  do_execsql_test 7.2 {
+    CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t1 USING rtree(a, b, c);
+    CREATE TABLE t2(d INTEGER, e INT);
+    INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
+  }
+
+  do_execsql_test 7.3 {
+    SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c IN (d) AND b IN (10,10,10);
+  } {{} 1 {} {} {}}
+}
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 8.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
+  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t1y ON t1(y);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(111, 'AAA'),(222, 'BBB'),(333, 'CCC');
+  CREATE TABLE t2(z);
+  INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('BBB'),('AAA');
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1', 't1y','100 1');
+}
+
+db close
+sqlite3 db test.db
+
+do_execsql_test 8.1 {
+  SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y;
+} {222 111}
+
+do_execsql_test 8.2 {
+  SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND +t1.x IN (111, 222);
+} {222 111}
+
+do_execsql_test 8.3 {
+  SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND t1.x IN (111, 222);
+} {222 111}
+
+# 2021-06-02 forum post https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/b4fcb8a598
+# OP_SeekScan changes from check-in 4a43430fd23f8835 on 2020-09-30 causes
+# performance regression.
+#
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 9.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE node(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
+  CREATE TABLE edge(node_from INT, node_to INT);
+  CREATE TABLE sub_nodes(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
+  CREATE INDEX edge_from_to ON edge(node_from,node_to);
+  CREATE INDEX edge_to_from ON edge(node_to,node_from);
+  ANALYZE;
+  DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES
+    ('sub_nodes',NULL,'1000000'),
+    ('edge','edge_to_from','20000000 2 2'),
+    ('edge','edge_from_to','20000000 2 2'),
+    ('node',NULL,'10000000');
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+} {}
+do_eqp_test 9.1 {
+SELECT count(*) FROM edge
+ WHERE node_from IN sub_nodes AND node_to IN sub_nodes;
+} {
+  QUERY PLAN
+  |--SEARCH edge USING COVERING INDEX edge_to_from (node_to=?)
+  |--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
+  `--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
+}
+# ^^^^^ the key to the above is that the index should only use a single
+#       term (node_to=?), not two terms (node_to=? AND node_from=).
+
+# dbsqlfuzz case
+#
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 10.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,d,PRIMARY KEY(a,b,c)) WITHOUT ROWID;
+  INSERT INTO t1(a,b,c,d) VALUES
+    (0,-2,2,3),
+    (0,2,3,4),
+    (0,5,8,10),
+    (1,7,11,13);
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1','10 3 2 1');
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  PRAGMA reverse_unordered_selects(1);
+  SELECT d FROM t1 WHERE 0=a AND b IN (-17,-4,-3,1,5,25,7798);
+} {10}
+
+# 2021-06-13 dbsqlfuzz e41762333a4d6e90a49e628f488d0873b2dba4c5
+# The opcode that preceeds OP_SeekScan is usually OP_IdxGT, but can
+# sometimes be OP_IdxGE
+#
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 11.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(a TEXT, b INT, c INT, d INT);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('abc',123,4,5);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('xyz',1,'abcdefxyz',99);
+  CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(b,b,c);
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','10000 5 00 2003 10');
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+} {}
+do_execsql_test 11.1 {
+  SELECT * FROM t1
+   WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1 
+                      WHERE b IN (345 NOT GLOB 510)
+                        AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
+     AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
+} {xyz 1 abcdefxyz 99}
+do_execsql_test 11.2 {
+  EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1
+   WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1 
+                      WHERE b IN (345 NOT GLOB 510)
+                        AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
+     AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
+} {/ SeekScan /}
+
+# 2021-06-25 ticket 6dcbfd11cf666e21
+# Another problem with OP_SeekScan
+#
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 12.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
+  CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(a,b,c);
+  CREATE INDEX t1bca on t1(b,c,a);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(56,1119,1115);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(57,1147,1137);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(100,1050,1023);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(101,1050,1023);
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','358677 2 2 1');
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1bca','358677 4 2 1');
+  ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
+  SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED
+   WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
+      OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
+} {56 1119 1115}
+do_execsql_test 12.1 {
+  SELECT * FROM t1
+   WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
+      OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
+} {56 1119 1115}
+
+# 2021-11-02 ticket 5981a8c041a3c2f3
+# Another OP_SeekScan problem.
+#
+reset_db
+do_execsql_test 13.0 {
+  CREATE TABLE t1(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, a INT, b INT, c INT);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10,1,2,5);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(20,1,3,5);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(30,1,2,4);
+  INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(40,1,3,4);
+  ANALYZE sqlite_master;
+  INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1x','84000 3 2 1');
+  CREATE INDEX t1x ON t1(a,b,c);
+  PRAGMA writable_schema=RESET;
+  SELECT * FROM t1
+   WHERE a=1
+     AND b IN (2,3)
+     AND c BETWEEN 4 AND 5
+   ORDER BY +id;
+} {10 1 2 5 20 1 3 5 30 1 2 4 40 1 3 4}
+
+finish_test