summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/www/version3.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000
commit63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3 (patch)
tree01c7571c7c762ceee70638549a99834fdd7c411b /www/version3.html
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadsqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.tar.xz
sqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.zip
Adding upstream version 3.45.1.upstream/3.45.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--www/version3.html418
1 files changed, 418 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/www/version3.html b/www/version3.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1fa24a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/www/version3.html
@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html><head>
+<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
+<link href="sqlite.css" rel="stylesheet">
+<title>SQLite Version 3 Overview</title>
+<!-- path= -->
+</head>
+<body>
+<div class=nosearch>
+<a href="index.html">
+<img class="logo" src="images/sqlite370_banner.gif" alt="SQLite" border="0">
+</a>
+<div><!-- IE hack to prevent disappearing logo --></div>
+<div class="tagline desktoponly">
+Small. Fast. Reliable.<br>Choose any three.
+</div>
+<div class="menu mainmenu">
+<ul>
+<li><a href="index.html">Home</a>
+<li class='mobileonly'><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick='toggle_div("submenu")'>Menu</a>
+<li class='wideonly'><a href='about.html'>About</a>
+<li class='desktoponly'><a href="docs.html">Documentation</a>
+<li class='desktoponly'><a href="download.html">Download</a>
+<li class='wideonly'><a href='copyright.html'>License</a>
+<li class='desktoponly'><a href="support.html">Support</a>
+<li class='desktoponly'><a href="prosupport.html">Purchase</a>
+<li class='search' id='search_menubutton'>
+<a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick='toggle_search()'>Search</a>
+</ul>
+</div>
+<div class="menu submenu" id="submenu">
+<ul>
+<li><a href='about.html'>About</a>
+<li><a href='docs.html'>Documentation</a>
+<li><a href='download.html'>Download</a>
+<li><a href='support.html'>Support</a>
+<li><a href='prosupport.html'>Purchase</a>
+</ul>
+</div>
+<div class="searchmenu" id="searchmenu">
+<form method="GET" action="search">
+<select name="s" id="searchtype">
+<option value="d">Search Documentation</option>
+<option value="c">Search Changelog</option>
+</select>
+<input type="text" name="q" id="searchbox" value="">
+<input type="submit" value="Go">
+</form>
+</div>
+</div>
+<script>
+function toggle_div(nm) {
+var w = document.getElementById(nm);
+if( w.style.display=="block" ){
+w.style.display = "none";
+}else{
+w.style.display = "block";
+}
+}
+function toggle_search() {
+var w = document.getElementById("searchmenu");
+if( w.style.display=="block" ){
+w.style.display = "none";
+} else {
+w.style.display = "block";
+setTimeout(function(){
+document.getElementById("searchbox").focus()
+}, 30);
+}
+}
+function div_off(nm){document.getElementById(nm).style.display="none";}
+window.onbeforeunload = function(e){div_off("submenu");}
+/* Disable the Search feature if we are not operating from CGI, since */
+/* Search is accomplished using CGI and will not work without it. */
+if( !location.origin || !location.origin.match || !location.origin.match(/http/) ){
+document.getElementById("search_menubutton").style.display = "none";
+}
+/* Used by the Hide/Show button beside syntax diagrams, to toggle the */
+function hideorshow(btn,obj){
+var x = document.getElementById(obj);
+var b = document.getElementById(btn);
+if( x.style.display!='none' ){
+x.style.display = 'none';
+b.innerHTML='show';
+}else{
+x.style.display = '';
+b.innerHTML='hide';
+}
+return false;
+}
+var antiRobot = 0;
+function antiRobotGo(){
+if( antiRobot!=3 ) return;
+antiRobot = 7;
+var j = document.getElementById("mtimelink");
+if(j && j.hasAttribute("data-href")) j.href=j.getAttribute("data-href");
+}
+function antiRobotDefense(){
+document.body.onmousedown=function(){
+antiRobot |= 2;
+antiRobotGo();
+document.body.onmousedown=null;
+}
+document.body.onmousemove=function(){
+antiRobot |= 2;
+antiRobotGo();
+document.body.onmousemove=null;
+}
+setTimeout(function(){
+antiRobot |= 1;
+antiRobotGo();
+}, 100)
+antiRobotGo();
+}
+antiRobotDefense();
+</script>
+
+
+<p>
+<center><table border="1" cellpadding="10" width="75%">
+<tr><td bgcolor="#ffffbb">
+<b>Editorial Note:</b>
+This document was written in 2004 as a guide to programmers who were
+transitioning from SQLite2 to SQLite3.
+It is retained as part of the historical record of SQLite.
+Modern programmers should refer to
+more up-to-date documentation on SQLite available elsewhere
+on this website.
+</table></center>
+
+<h2>SQLite Version 3 Overview</h2>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 3.0 introduces important changes to the library, including:
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>A more compact format for database files.</li>
+<li>Manifest typing and BLOB support.</li>
+<li>Support for both UTF-8 and UTF-16 text.</li>
+<li>User-defined text collating sequences.</li>
+<li>64-bit ROWIDs.</li>
+<li>Improved Concurrency.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+This document is a quick introduction to the changes for SQLite 3.0
+for users who are already familiar with SQLite version 2.8.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Naming Changes</h3>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 2.8 will continue to be supported with bug fixes
+for the foreseeable future. In order to allow SQLite version 2.8
+and SQLite version 3.0 to peacefully coexist, the names of key files
+and APIs in SQLite version 3.0 have been changed to include the
+character "3". For example, the include file used by C programs
+has been changed from "sqlite.h" to "sqlite3.h". And the name of
+the shell program used to interact with databases has been changed
+from "sqlite.exe" to "sqlite3.exe". With these changes, it is possible
+to have both SQLite 2.8 and SQLite 3.0 installed on the same system at
+the same time. And it is possible for the same C program to link
+against both SQLite 2.8 and SQLite 3.0 at the same time and to use
+both libraries at the same time.
+</p>
+
+<h3>New File Format</h3>
+
+<p>
+The format used by SQLite database files has been completely revised.
+The old version 2.1 format and the new 3.0 format are incompatible with
+one another. Version 2.8 of SQLite will not read a version 3.0 database
+files and version 3.0 of SQLite will not read a version 2.8 database file.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To convert an SQLite 2.8 database into an SQLite 3.0 database, have
+ready the command-line shells for both version 2.8 and 3.0. Then
+enter a command like the following:
+</p>
+
+<blockquote><pre>
+sqlite OLD.DB .dump | sqlite3 NEW.DB
+</pre></blockquote>
+
+<p>
+The new database file format uses B+trees for tables. In a B+tree, all
+data is stored in the leaves of the tree instead of in both the leaves and
+the intermediate branch nodes. The use of B+trees for tables allows for
+better scalability and the storage of larger data fields without the use of
+overflow pages. Traditional B-trees are still used for indices.</p>
+
+<p>
+The new file format also supports variable pages sizes between 512 and
+65536 bytes. The size of a page is stored in the file header so the
+same library can read databases with different pages sizes, in theory,
+though this feature has not yet been implemented in practice.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The new file format omits unused fields from its disk images. For example,
+indices use only the key part of a B-tree record and not the data. So
+for indices, the field that records the length of the data is omitted.
+Integer values such as the length of key and data are stored using
+a variable-length encoding so that only one or two bytes are required to
+store the most common cases but up to 64-bits of information can be encoded
+if needed.
+Integer and floating point data is stored on the disk in binary rather
+than being converted into ASCII as in SQLite version 2.8.
+These changes taken together result in database files that are typically
+25% to 35% smaller than the equivalent files in SQLite version 2.8.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Details of the low-level B-tree format used in SQLite version 3.0 can
+be found in header comments to the
+<a href="https://www.sqlite.org/src/finfo?name=src/btreeInt.h">btreeInt.h</a>
+source file and in the <a href="fileformat2.html">file format</a> documentation.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Manifest Typing and BLOB Support</h3>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 2.8 will deal with data in various formats internally,
+but when writing to the disk or interacting through its API, SQLite 2.8
+always converts data into ASCII text. SQLite 3.0, in contrast, exposes
+its internal data representations to the user and stores binary representations
+to disk when appropriate. The exposing of non-ASCII representations was
+added in order to support BLOBs.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 2.8 had the feature that any type of data could be stored
+in any table column regardless of the declared type of that column. This
+feature is retained in version 3.0, though in a slightly modified form.
+Each table column will store any type of data, though columns have an
+affinity for the format of data defined by their declared datatype.
+When data is inserted into a column, that column will make an attempt
+to convert the data format into the column's declared type. All SQL
+database engines do this. The difference is that SQLite 3.0 will
+still store the data even if a format conversion is not possible.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+For example, if you have a table column declared to be of type "INTEGER"
+and you try to insert a string, the column will look at the text string
+and see if it looks like a number. If the string does look like a number
+it is converted into a number and into an integer if the number does not
+have a fractional part, and stored that way. But if the string is not
+a well-formed number it is still stored as a string. A column with a
+type of "TEXT" tries to convert numbers into an ASCII-Text representation
+before storing them. But BLOBs are stored in TEXT columns as BLOBs because
+you cannot in general convert a BLOB into text.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In most other SQL database engines the datatype is associated with
+the table column that holds the data - with the data container.
+In SQLite 3.0, the datatype is associated with the data itself, not
+with its container.
+<a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/">Paul Graham</a> in his book
+<i><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/acl.html">ANSI Common Lisp</a></i></a>
+calls this property "Manifest Typing".
+Other writers have other definitions for the term "manifest typing",
+so beware of confusion. But by whatever name, that is the datatype
+model supported by SQLite 3.0.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Additional information about datatypes in SQLite version 3.0 is
+available
+<a href="datatype3.html">separately</a>.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Support for UTF-8 and UTF-16</h3>
+
+<p>
+The new API for SQLite 3.0 contains routines that accept text as
+both UTF-8 and UTF-16 in the native byte order of the host machine.
+Each database file manages text as either UTF-8, UTF-16BE (big-endian),
+or UTF-16LE (little-endian). Internally and in the disk file, the
+same text representation is used everywhere. If the text representation
+specified by the database file (in the file header) does not match
+the text representation required by the interface routines, then text
+is converted on-the-fly.
+Constantly converting text from one representation to another can be
+computationally expensive, so it is suggested that programmers choose a
+single representation and stick with it throughout their application.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the current implementation of SQLite, the SQL parser only works
+with UTF-8 text. So if you supply UTF-16 text it will be converted.
+This is just an implementation issue and there is nothing to prevent
+future versions of SQLite from parsing UTF-16 encoded SQL natively.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+When creating new user-defined SQL functions and collating sequences,
+each function or collating sequence can specify if it works with
+UTF-8, UTF-16be, or UTF-16le. Separate implementations can be registered
+for each encoding. If an SQL function or collating sequence is required
+but a version for the current text encoding is not available, then
+the text is automatically converted. As before, this conversion takes
+computation time, so programmers are advised to pick a single
+encoding and stick with it in order to minimize the amount of unnecessary
+format juggling.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+SQLite is not particular about the text it receives and is more than
+happy to process text strings that are not normalized or even
+well-formed UTF-8 or UTF-16. Thus, programmers who want to store
+ISO8859 data can do so using the UTF-8 interfaces. As long as no
+attempts are made to use a UTF-16 collating sequence or SQL function,
+the byte sequence of the text will not be modified in any way.
+</p>
+
+<h3>User-defined Collating Sequences</h3>
+
+<p>
+A collating sequence is just a defined order for text. When SQLite 3.0
+sorts (or uses a comparison operator like "&lt;" or "&gt;=") the sort
+order is first determined by the data type.
+</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>NULLs sort first</li>
+<li>Numeric values sort next in numerical order</li>
+<li>Text values come after numerics</li>
+<li>BLOBs sort last</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+Collating sequences are used for comparing two text strings.
+The collating sequence does not change the ordering of NULLs, numbers,
+or BLOBs, only text.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+A collating sequence is implemented as a function that takes the
+two strings being compared as inputs and returns negative, zero, or
+positive if the first string is less than, equal to, or greater than
+the second.
+SQLite 3.0 comes with a single built-in collating sequence named "BINARY"
+which is implemented using the memcmp() routine from the standard C library.
+The BINARY collating sequence works well for English text. For other
+languages or locales, alternative collating sequences may be preferred.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The decision of which collating sequence to use is controlled by the
+COLLATE clause in SQL. A COLLATE clause can occur on a table definition,
+to define a default collating sequence to a table column, or on field
+of an index, or in the ORDER BY clause of a SELECT statement.
+Planned enhancements to SQLite are to include standard CAST() syntax
+to allow the collating sequence of an expression to be defined.
+</p>
+
+<h3>64-bit ROWIDs</h3>
+
+<p>
+Every row of a table has a unique rowid.
+If the table defines a column with the type "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY" then that
+column becomes an alias for the rowid. But with or without an INTEGER PRIMARY
+KEY column, every row still has a rowid.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In SQLite version 3.0, the rowid is a 64-bit signed integer.
+This is an expansion of SQLite version 2.8 which only permitted
+rowids of 32-bits.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+To minimize storage space, the 64-bit rowid is stored as a variable length
+integer. Rowids between 0 and 127 use only a single byte.
+Rowids between 0 and 16383 use just 2 bytes. Up to 2097152 uses three
+bytes. And so forth. Negative rowids are allowed but they always use
+nine bytes of storage and so their use is discouraged. When rowids
+are generated automatically by SQLite, they will always be non-negative.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Improved Concurrency</h3>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 2.8 allowed multiple simultaneous readers or a single
+writer but not both. SQLite version 3.0 allows one process to begin
+writing the database while other processes continue to read. The
+writer must still obtain an exclusive lock on the database for a brief
+interval in order to commit its changes, but the exclusive lock is no
+longer required for the entire write operation.
+A <a href="lockingv3.html">more detailed report</a> on the locking
+behavior of SQLite version 3.0 is available separately.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+A limited form of table-level locking is now also available in SQLite.
+If each table is stored in a separate database file, those separate
+files can be attached to the main database (using the ATTACH command)
+and the combined databases will function as one. But locks will only
+be acquired on individual files as needed. So if you redefine "database"
+to mean two or more database files, then it is entirely possible for
+two processes to be writing to the same database at the same time.
+To further support this capability, commits of transactions involving
+two or more ATTACHed database are now atomic.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Credits</h3>
+
+<p>
+SQLite version 3.0 is made possible in part by AOL developers
+supporting and embracing great Open-Source Software.
+</p>
+
+