diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/userguide/capture-hardware/dpdk.rst | 38 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/userguide/capture-hardware/dpdk.rst b/doc/userguide/capture-hardware/dpdk.rst index 1b9ecae..6be7278 100644 --- a/doc/userguide/capture-hardware/dpdk.rst +++ b/doc/userguide/capture-hardware/dpdk.rst @@ -146,3 +146,41 @@ management and worker CPU set. - worker-cpu-set: cpu: [ 2,4,6,8 ] ... + +Interrupt (power-saving) mode +----------------------------- + +The DPDK is traditionally recognized for its polling mode operation. +In this mode, CPU cores are continuously querying for packets from +the Network Interface Card (NIC). While this approach offers benefits like +reduced latency and improved performance, it might not be the most efficient +in scenarios with sporadic or low traffic. +The constant polling can lead to unnecessary CPU consumption. +To address this, DPDK offers an `interrupt` mode. + +The obvious advantage that interrupt mode brings is power efficiency. +So far in our tests, we haven't observed a decrease in performance. Suricata's +performance has actually seen a slight improvement. +The (IPS runmode) users should be aware that interrupts can +introduce non-deterministic latency. However, the latency should never be +higher than in other (e.g. AF_PACKET/AF_XDP/...) capture methods. + +Interrupt mode in DPDK can be configured on a per-interface basis. +This allows for a hybrid setup where some workers operate in polling mode, +while others utilize the interrupt mode. +The configuration for the interrupt mode can be found and modified in the +DPDK section of the suricata.yaml file. + +Below is a sample configuration that demonstrates how to enable the interrupt mode for a specific interface: + +:: + + ... + dpdk: + eal-params: + proc-type: primary + + interfaces: + - interface: 0000:3b:00.0 + interrupt-mode: true + threads: 4 |