From 55944e5e40b1be2afc4855d8d2baf4b73d1876b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:49:52 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 255.4. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md | 384 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 384 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md (limited to 'docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md') diff --git a/docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md b/docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f5ff11 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/PORTABLE_SERVICES.md @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@ +--- +title: Portable Services Introduction +category: Concepts +layout: default +SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later +--- + +# Portable Services + +systemd (since version 239) supports a concept of "Portable Services". +"Portable Services" are a delivery method for system services that uses +two specific features of container management: + +1. Applications are bundled. I.e. multiple services, their binaries and all + their dependencies are packaged in an image, and are run directly from it. + +2. Stricter default security policies, i.e. sand-boxing of applications. + +The primary tool for interacting with Portable Services is `portablectl`, +and they are managed by the `systemd-portabled` service. + +Portable services don't bring anything inherently new to the table. All they do +is put together known concepts to cover a specific set of use-cases in a +slightly nicer way. + +## So, what *is* a "Portable Service"? + +A portable service is ultimately just an OS tree, either inside of a directory, +or inside a raw disk image containing a Linux file system. This tree is called +the "image". It can be "attached" or "detached" from the system. When +"attached", specific systemd units from the image are made available on the +host system, then behaving pretty much exactly like locally installed system +services. When "detached", these units are removed again from the host, leaving +no artifacts around (except maybe messages they might have logged). + +The OS tree/image can be created with any tool of your choice. For example, you +can use `dnf --installroot=` if you like, or `debootstrap`, the image format is +entirely generic, and doesn't have to carry any specific metadata beyond what +distribution images carry anyway. Or to say this differently: the image format +doesn't define any new metadata as unit files and OS tree directories or disk +images are already sufficient, and pretty universally available these days. One +particularly nice tool for creating suitable images is +[mkosi](https://github.com/systemd/mkosi), but many other existing tools will +do too. + +Portable services may also be constructed from layers, similarly to container +environments. See [Extension Images](#extension-images) below. + +If you so will, "Portable Services" are a nicer way to manage chroot() +environments, with better security, tooling and behavior. + +## Where's the difference to a "Container"? + +"Container" is a very vague term, after all it is used for +systemd-nspawn/LXC-type OS containers, for Docker/rkt-like micro service +containers, and even certain 'lightweight' VM runtimes. + +"Portable services" do not provide a fully isolated environment to the payload, +like containers mostly intend to. Instead, they are more like regular system +services, can be controlled with the same tools, are exposed the same way in +all infrastructure, and so on. The main difference is that they use a different +root directory than the rest of the system. Hence, the intent is not to run +code in a different, isolated environment from the host — like most containers +would — but to run it in the same environment, but with stricter access +controls on what the service can see and do. + +One point of differentiation: since programs running as "portable services" are +pretty much regular system services, they won't run as PID 1 (like they would +under Docker), but as normal processes. A corollary of that is that they aren't +supposed to manage anything in their own environment (such as the network) as +the execution environment is mostly shared with the rest of the system. + +The primary focus use-case of "portable services" is to extend the host system +with encapsulated extensions, but provide almost full integration with the rest +of the system, though possibly restricted by security knobs. This focus +includes system extensions otherwise sometimes called "super-privileged +containers". + +Note that portable services are only available for system services, not for +user services (i.e. the functionality cannot be used for the stuff +bubblewrap/flatpak is focusing on). + +## Mode of Operation + +If you have a portable service image, maybe in a raw disk image called +`foobar_0.7.23.raw`, then attaching the services to the host is as easy as: + +``` +# portablectl attach foobar_0.7.23.raw +``` + +This command does the following: + +1. It dissects the image, checks and validates the `os-release` file of the + image, and looks for all included unit files. + +2. It copies out all unit files with a suffix of `.service`, `.socket`, + `.target`, `.timer` and `.path`, whose name begins with the image's name + (with `.raw` removed), truncated at the first underscore if there is one. + This prefix name generated from the image name must be followed by a ".", + "-" or "@" character in the unit name. Or in other words, given the image + name of `foobar_0.7.23.raw` all unit files matching + `foobar-*.{service|socket|target|timer|path}`, + `foobar@.{service|socket|target|timer|path}` as well as + `foobar.*.{service|socket|target|timer|path}` and + `foobar.{service|socket|target|timer|path}` are copied out. These unit files + are placed in `/etc/systemd/system.attached/` (which is part of the normal + unit file search path of PID 1, and thus loaded exactly like regular unit + files). Within the images the unit files are looked for at the usual + locations, i.e. in `/usr/lib/systemd/system/` and `/etc/systemd/system/` and + so on, relative to the image's root. + +3. For each such unit file a drop-in file is created. Let's say + `foobar-waldo.service` was one of the unit files copied to + `/etc/systemd/system.attached/`, then a drop-in file + `/etc/systemd/system.attached/foobar-waldo.service.d/20-portable.conf` is + created, containing a few lines of additional configuration: + + ``` + [Service] + RootImage=/path/to/foobar.raw + Environment=PORTABLE=foobar + LogExtraFields=PORTABLE=foobar + ``` + +4. For each such unit a "profile" drop-in is linked in. This "profile" drop-in + generally contains security options that lock down the service. By default + the `default` profile is used, which provides a medium level of security. + There's also `trusted`, which runs the service with no restrictions, i.e. in + the host file system root and with full privileges. The `strict` profile + comes with the toughest security restrictions. Finally, `nonetwork` is like + `default` but without network access. Users may define their own profiles + too (or modify the existing ones). + +And that's already it. + +Note that the images need to stay around (and in the same location) as long as the +portable service is attached. If an image is moved, the `RootImage=` line +written to the unit drop-in would point to an non-existent path, and break +access to the image. + +The `portablectl detach` command executes the reverse operation: it looks for +the drop-ins and the unit files associated with the image, and removes them. + +Note that `portablectl attach` won't enable or start any of the units it copies +out by default, but `--enable` and `--now` parameter are available as shortcuts. +The same is true for the opposite `detach` operation. + +The `portablectl reattach` command combines a `detach` with an `attach`. It is +useful in case an image gets upgraded, as it allows performing a `restart` +operation on the units instead of `stop` plus `start`, thus providing lower +downtime and avoiding losing runtime state associated with the unit such as the +file descriptor store. + +## Requirements on Images + +Note that portable services don't introduce any new image format, but most OS +images should just work the way they are. Specifically, the following +requirements are made for an image that can be attached/detached with +`portablectl`. + +1. It must contain an executable that shall be invoked, along with all its + dependencies. Any binary code needs to be compiled for an architecture + compatible with the host. + +2. The image must either be a plain sub-directory (or btrfs subvolume) + containing the binaries and its dependencies in a classic Linux OS tree, or + must be a raw disk image either containing only one, naked file system, or + an image with a partition table understood by the Linux kernel with only a + single partition defined, or alternatively, a GPT partition table with a set + of properly marked partitions following the + [Discoverable Partitions Specification](https://uapi-group.org/specifications/specs/discoverable_partitions_specification). + +3. The image must at least contain one matching unit file, with the right name + prefix and suffix (see above). The unit file is searched in the usual paths, + i.e. primarily /etc/systemd/system/ and /usr/lib/systemd/system/ within the + image. (The implementation will check a couple of other paths too, but it's + recommended to use these two paths.) + +4. The image must contain an os-release file, either in `/etc/os-release` or + `/usr/lib/os-release`. The file should follow the standard format. + +5. The image must contain the files `/etc/resolv.conf` and `/etc/machine-id` + (empty files are ok), they will be bind mounted from the host at runtime. + +6. The image must contain directories `/proc/`, `/sys/`, `/dev/`, `/run/`, + `/tmp/`, `/var/tmp/` that can be mounted over with the corresponding version + from the host. + +7. The OS might require other files or directories to be in place. For example, + if the image is built based on glibc, the dynamic loader needs to be + available in `/lib/ld-linux.so.2` or `/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2` (or + similar, depending on architecture), and if the distribution implements a + merged `/usr/` tree, this means `/lib` and/or `/lib64` need to be symlinks + to their respective counterparts below `/usr/`. For details see your + distribution's documentation. + +Note that images created by tools such as `debootstrap`, `dnf --installroot=` +or `mkosi` generally satisfy all of the above. If you wonder what the most +minimal image would be that complies with the requirements above, it could +consist of this: + +``` +/usr/bin/minimald # a statically compiled binary +/usr/lib/systemd/system/minimal-test.service # the unit file for the service, with ExecStart=/usr/bin/minimald +/usr/lib/os-release # an os-release file explaining what this is +/etc/resolv.conf # empty file to mount over with host's version +/etc/machine-id # ditto +/proc/ # empty directory to use as mount point for host's API fs +/sys/ # ditto +/dev/ # ditto +/run/ # ditto +/tmp/ # ditto +/var/tmp/ # ditto +``` + +And that's it. + +Note that qualifying images do not have to contain an init system of their +own. If they do, it's fine, it will be ignored by the portable service logic, +but they generally don't have to, and it might make sense to avoid any, to keep +images minimal. + +If the image is writable, and some of the files or directories that are +overmounted from the host do not exist yet they will be automatically created. +On read-only, immutable images (e.g. `erofs` or `squashfs` images) all files +and directories to over-mount must exist already. + +Note that as no new image format or metadata is defined, it's very +straightforward to define images than can be made use of in a number of +different ways. For example, by using `mkosi -b` you can trivially build a +single, unified image that: + +1. Can be attached as portable service, to run any container services natively + on the host. + +2. Can be run as OS container, using `systemd-nspawn`, by booting the image + with `systemd-nspawn -i -b`. + +3. Can be booted directly as VM image, using a generic VM executor such as + `virtualbox`/`qemu`/`kvm` + +4. Can be booted directly on bare-metal systems. + +Of course, to facilitate 2, 3 and 4 you need to include an init system in the +image. To facilitate 3 and 4 you also need to include a boot loader in the +image. As mentioned, `mkosi -b` takes care of all of that for you, but any +other image generator should work too. + +The +[os-release(5)](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/os-release.html) +file may optionally be extended with a `PORTABLE_PREFIXES=` field listing all +supported portable service prefixes for the image (see above). This is useful +for informational purposes (as it allows recognizing portable service images +from their contents as such), but is also useful to protect the image from +being used under a wrong name and prefix. This is particularly relevant if the +images are cryptographically authenticated (via Verity or a similar mechanism) +as this way the (not necessarily authenticated) image file name can be +validated against the (authenticated) image contents. If the field is not +specified the image will work fine, but is not necessarily recognizable as +portable service image, and any set of units included in the image may be +attached, there are no restrictions enforced. + +## Extension Images + +Portable services can be delivered as one or multiple images that extend the base +image, and are combined with OverlayFS at runtime, when they are attached. This +enables a workflow that splits the base 'runtime' from the daemon, so that multiple +portable services can share the same 'runtime' image (libraries, tools) without +having to include everything each time, with the layering happening only at runtime. +The `--extension` parameter of `portablectl` can be used to specify as many upper +layers as desired. On top of the requirements listed in the previous section, the +following must be also be observed: + +1. The base/OS image must contain an `os-release file`, either in `/etc/os-release` + or `/usr/lib/os-release`, in the standard format. + +2. The upper extension images must contain an extension-release file in + `/usr/lib/extension-release.d/`, with an `ID=` and `SYSEXT_LEVEL=`/`VERSION_ID=` + matching the base image for sysexts, or `/etc/extension-release.d/`, with an + `ID=` and `CONFEXT_LEVEL=`/`VERSION_ID=` matching the base image for confexts. + +3. The base/OS image does not need to have any unit files. + +4. The upper sysext images must contain at least one matching unit file each, + with the right name prefix and suffix (see above). Confext images do not have + to contain units. + +5. As with the base/OS image, each upper extension image must be a plain + sub-directory, btrfs subvolume, or a raw disk image. + +``` +# portablectl attach --extension foobar_0.7.23.raw debian-runtime_11.1.raw foobar +# portablectl attach --extension barbaz_7.0.23/ debian-runtime_11.1.raw barbaz +``` + +## Execution Environment + +Note that the code in portable service images is run exactly like regular +services. Hence there's no new execution environment to consider. And, unlike +Docker would do it, as these are regular system services they aren't run as PID +1 either, but with regular PID values. + +## Access to host resources + +If services shipped with this mechanism shall be able to access host resources +(such as files or AF_UNIX sockets for IPC), use the normal `BindPaths=` and +`BindReadOnlyPaths=` settings in unit files to mount them in. In fact, the +`default` profile mentioned above makes use of this to ensure +`/etc/resolv.conf`, the D-Bus system bus socket or write access to the logging +subsystem are available to the service. + +## Instantiation + +Sometimes it makes sense to instantiate the same set of services multiple +times. The portable service concept does not introduce a new logic for this. It +is recommended to use the regular systemd unit templating for this, i.e. to +include template units such as `foobar@.service`, so that instantiation is as +simple as: + +``` +# portablectl attach foobar_0.7.23.raw +# systemctl enable --now foobar@instancea.service +# systemctl enable --now foobar@instanceb.service +… +``` + +The benefit of this approach is that templating works exactly the same for +units shipped with the OS itself as for attached portable services. + +## Immutable images with local data + +It's a good idea to keep portable service images read-only during normal +operation. In fact, all but the `trusted` profile will default to this kind of +behaviour, by setting the `ProtectSystem=strict` option. In this case writable +service data may be placed on the host file system. Use `StateDirectory=` in +the unit files to enable such behaviour and add a local data directory to the +services copied onto the host. + +## Logging + +Several fields are autotmatically added to log messages generated by a portable +service (or about a portable service, e.g.: start/stop logs from systemd). +The `PORTABLE=` field will refer to the name of the portable image where the unit +was loaded from. In case extensions are used, additionally there will be a +`PORTABLE_ROOT=` field, referring to the name of image used as the base layer +(i.e.: `RootImage=` or `RootDirectory=`), and one `PORTABLE_EXTENSION=` field per +each extension image used. + +The `os-release` file from the portable image will be parsed and added as structured +metadata to the journal log entries. The parsed fields will be the first ID field which +is set from the set of `IMAGE_ID` and `ID` in this order of preference, and the first +version field which is set from a set of `IMAGE_VERSION`, `VERSION_ID`, and `BUILD_ID` +in this order of preference. The ID and version, if any, are concatenated with an +underscore (`_`) as separator. If only either one is found, it will be used by itself. +The field will be named `PORTABLE_NAME_AND_VERSION=`. + +In case extensions are used, the same fields in the same order are, but prefixed by +`SYSEXT_`/`CONFEXT_`, are parsed from each `extension-release` file, and are appended +to the journal as log entries, using `PORTABLE_EXTENSION_NAME_AND_VERSION=` as the +field name. The base layer's field will be named `PORTABLE_ROOT_NAME_AND_VERSION=` +instead of `PORTABLE_NAME_AND_VERSION=` in this case. + +For example, a portable service `app0` using two extensions `app0.raw` and +`app1.raw` (with `SYSEXT_ID=app`, and `SYSEXT_VERSION_ID=` `0` and `1` in their +respective extension-releases), and a base layer `base.raw` (with `VERSION_ID=10` and +`ID=debian` in `os-release`), will create log entries with the following fields: + +``` +PORTABLE=app0.raw +PORTABLE_ROOT=base.raw +PORTABLE_ROOT_NAME_AND_VERSION=debian_10 +PORTABLE_EXTENSION=app0.raw +PORTABLE_EXTENSION_NAME_AND_VERSION=app_0 +PORTABLE_EXTENSION=app1.raw +PORTABLE_EXTENSION_NAME_AND_VERSION=app_1 +``` + +## Links + +[`portablectl(1)`](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/portablectl.html)
+[`systemd-portabled.service(8)`](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-portabled.service.html)
+[Walkthrough for Portable Services](https://0pointer.net/blog/walkthrough-for-portable-services.html)
+[Repo with examples](https://github.com/systemd/portable-walkthrough) -- cgit v1.2.3