1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/extensions/string-literal-getter-setter-decompilation.js b/js/src/tests/non262/extensions/string-literal-getter-setter-decompilation.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a0a5714053
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/non262/extensions/string-literal-getter-setter-decompilation.js
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
+// http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/
+
+var f;
+try
+{
+  f = eval("(function literalInside() { return { set 'c d e'(v) { } }; })");
+}
+catch (e)
+{
+  assertEq(true, false,
+           "string-literal property name in setter in object literal in " +
+           "function statement failed to parse: " + e);
+}
+
+var fstr = "" + f;
+assertEq(fstr.indexOf("set") < fstr.indexOf("c d e"), true,
+         "should be using new-style syntax with string literal in place of " +
+         "property identifier");
+assertEq(fstr.indexOf("setter") < 0, true, "using old-style syntax?");
+
+var o = f();
+var ostr = "" + o;
+assertEq("c d e" in o, true, "missing the property?");
+assertEq("set" in Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(o, "c d e"), true,
+         "'c d e' property not a setter?");
+// disabled because we still generate old-style syntax here (toSource
+// decompilation is as yet unfixed)
+// assertEq(ostr.indexOf("set") < ostr.indexOf("c d e"), true,
+//         "should be using new-style syntax when getting the source of a " +
+//         "getter/setter while decompiling an object");
+// assertEq(ostr.indexOf("setter") < 0, true, "using old-style syntax?");
+
+reportCompare(true, true);