diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000 |
commit | 2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4 (patch) | |
tree | 848558de17fb3008cdf4d861b01ac7781903ce39 /Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.tar.xz linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.zip |
Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst | 150 |
1 files changed, 150 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e139f22b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +======================== +Devicetree Overlay Notes +======================== + +This document describes the implementation of the in-kernel +device tree overlay functionality residing in drivers/of/overlay.c and is a +companion document to Documentation/devicetree/dynamic-resolution-notes.rst[1] + +How overlays work +----------------- + +A Devicetree's overlay purpose is to modify the kernel's live tree, and +have the modification affecting the state of the kernel in a way that +is reflecting the changes. +Since the kernel mainly deals with devices, any new device node that result +in an active device should have it created while if the device node is either +disabled or removed all together, the affected device should be deregistered. + +Lets take an example where we have a foo board with the following base tree:: + + ---- foo.dts --------------------------------------------------------------- + /* FOO platform */ + /dts-v1/; + / { + compatible = "corp,foo"; + + /* shared resources */ + res: res { + }; + + /* On chip peripherals */ + ocp: ocp { + /* peripherals that are always instantiated */ + peripheral1 { ... }; + }; + }; + ---- foo.dts --------------------------------------------------------------- + +The overlay bar.dts, +:: + + ---- bar.dts - overlay target location by label ---------------------------- + /dts-v1/; + /plugin/; + &ocp { + /* bar peripheral */ + bar { + compatible = "corp,bar"; + ... /* various properties and child nodes */ + }; + }; + ---- bar.dts --------------------------------------------------------------- + +when loaded (and resolved as described in [1]) should result in foo+bar.dts:: + + ---- foo+bar.dts ----------------------------------------------------------- + /* FOO platform + bar peripheral */ + / { + compatible = "corp,foo"; + + /* shared resources */ + res: res { + }; + + /* On chip peripherals */ + ocp: ocp { + /* peripherals that are always instantiated */ + peripheral1 { ... }; + + /* bar peripheral */ + bar { + compatible = "corp,bar"; + ... /* various properties and child nodes */ + }; + }; + }; + ---- foo+bar.dts ----------------------------------------------------------- + +As a result of the overlay, a new device node (bar) has been created +so a bar platform device will be registered and if a matching device driver +is loaded the device will be created as expected. + +If the base DT was not compiled with the -@ option then the "&ocp" label +will not be available to resolve the overlay node(s) to the proper location +in the base DT. In this case, the target path can be provided. The target +location by label syntax is preferred because the overlay can be applied to +any base DT containing the label, no matter where the label occurs in the DT. + +The above bar.dts example modified to use target path syntax is:: + + ---- bar.dts - overlay target location by explicit path -------------------- + /dts-v1/; + /plugin/; + &{/ocp} { + /* bar peripheral */ + bar { + compatible = "corp,bar"; + ... /* various properties and child nodes */ + } + }; + ---- bar.dts --------------------------------------------------------------- + + +Overlay in-kernel API +-------------------------------- + +The API is quite easy to use. + +1) Call of_overlay_fdt_apply() to create and apply an overlay changeset. The + return value is an error or a cookie identifying this overlay. + +2) Call of_overlay_remove() to remove and cleanup the overlay changeset + previously created via the call to of_overlay_fdt_apply(). Removal of an + overlay changeset that is stacked by another will not be permitted. + +Finally, if you need to remove all overlays in one-go, just call +of_overlay_remove_all() which will remove every single one in the correct +order. + +There is the option to register notifiers that get called on +overlay operations. See of_overlay_notifier_register/unregister and +enum of_overlay_notify_action for details. + +A notifier callback for OF_OVERLAY_PRE_APPLY, OF_OVERLAY_POST_APPLY, or +OF_OVERLAY_PRE_REMOVE may store pointers to a device tree node in the overlay +or its content but these pointers must not persist past the notifier callback +for OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE. The memory containing the overlay will be +kfree()ed after OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE notifiers are called. Note that the +memory will be kfree()ed even if the notifier for OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE +returns an error. + +The changeset notifiers in drivers/of/dynamic.c are a second type of notifier +that could be triggered by applying or removing an overlay. These notifiers +are not allowed to store pointers to a device tree node in the overlay +or its content. The overlay code does not protect against such pointers +remaining active when the memory containing the overlay is freed as a result +of removing the overlay. + +Any other code that retains a pointer to the overlay nodes or data is +considered to be a bug because after removing the overlay the pointer +will refer to freed memory. + +Users of overlays must be especially aware of the overall operations that +occur on the system to ensure that other kernel code does not retain any +pointers to the overlay nodes or data. Any example of an inadvertent use +of such pointers is if a driver or subsystem module is loaded after an +overlay has been applied, and the driver or subsystem scans the entire +devicetree or a large portion of it, including the overlay nodes. |