summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000
commit2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4 (patch)
tree848558de17fb3008cdf4d861b01ac7781903ce39 /kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.tar.xz
linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.zip
Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h')
-rw-r--r--kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h1304
1 files changed, 1304 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..044026abf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -0,0 +1,1304 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
+/*
+ * Read-Copy Update mechanism for mutual exclusion (tree-based version)
+ * Internal non-public definitions that provide either classic
+ * or preemptible semantics.
+ *
+ * Copyright Red Hat, 2009
+ * Copyright IBM Corporation, 2009
+ *
+ * Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
+ * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+
+#include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
+
+static bool rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ /*
+ * In order to read the offloaded state of an rdp in a safe
+ * and stable way and prevent from its value to be changed
+ * under us, we must either hold the barrier mutex, the cpu
+ * hotplug lock (read or write) or the nocb lock. Local
+ * non-preemptible reads are also safe. NOCB kthreads and
+ * timers have their own means of synchronization against the
+ * offloaded state updaters.
+ */
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(
+ !(lockdep_is_held(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex) ||
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && lockdep_is_cpus_held()) ||
+ rcu_lockdep_is_held_nocb(rdp) ||
+ (rdp == this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data) &&
+ !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && preemptible())) ||
+ rcu_current_is_nocb_kthread(rdp)),
+ "Unsafe read of RCU_NOCB offloaded state"
+ );
+
+ return rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check the RCU kernel configuration parameters and print informative
+ * messages about anything out of the ordinary.
+ */
+static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE))
+ pr_info("\tRCU event tracing is enabled.\n");
+ if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && RCU_FANOUT != 64) ||
+ (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && RCU_FANOUT != 32))
+ pr_info("\tCONFIG_RCU_FANOUT set to non-default value of %d.\n",
+ RCU_FANOUT);
+ if (rcu_fanout_exact)
+ pr_info("\tHierarchical RCU autobalancing is disabled.\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
+ pr_info("\tRCU lockdep checking is enabled.\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD))
+ pr_info("\tRCU strict (and thus non-scalable) grace periods are enabled.\n");
+ if (RCU_NUM_LVLS >= 4)
+ pr_info("\tFour(or more)-level hierarchy is enabled.\n");
+ if (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF != 16)
+ pr_info("\tBuild-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n",
+ RCU_FANOUT_LEAF);
+ if (rcu_fanout_leaf != RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n",
+ rcu_fanout_leaf);
+ if (nr_cpu_ids != NR_CPUS)
+ pr_info("\tRCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=%d to nr_cpu_ids=%u.\n", NR_CPUS, nr_cpu_ids);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
+ pr_info("\tRCU priority boosting: priority %d delay %d ms.\n",
+ kthread_prio, CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY);
+#endif
+ if (blimit != DEFAULT_RCU_BLIMIT)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of callback invocation limit to %ld.\n", blimit);
+ if (qhimark != DEFAULT_RCU_QHIMARK)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of callback high-water mark to %ld.\n", qhimark);
+ if (qlowmark != DEFAULT_RCU_QLOMARK)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of callback low-water mark to %ld.\n", qlowmark);
+ if (qovld != DEFAULT_RCU_QOVLD)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of callback overload level to %ld.\n", qovld);
+ if (jiffies_till_first_fqs != ULONG_MAX)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of first FQS scan delay to %ld jiffies.\n", jiffies_till_first_fqs);
+ if (jiffies_till_next_fqs != ULONG_MAX)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of subsequent FQS scan delay to %ld jiffies.\n", jiffies_till_next_fqs);
+ if (jiffies_till_sched_qs != ULONG_MAX)
+ pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of scheduler-enlistment delay to %ld jiffies.\n", jiffies_till_sched_qs);
+ if (rcu_kick_kthreads)
+ pr_info("\tKick kthreads if too-long grace period.\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD))
+ pr_info("\tRCU callback double-/use-after-free debug is enabled.\n");
+ if (gp_preinit_delay)
+ pr_info("\tRCU debug GP pre-init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_preinit_delay);
+ if (gp_init_delay)
+ pr_info("\tRCU debug GP init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_init_delay);
+ if (gp_cleanup_delay)
+ pr_info("\tRCU debug GP cleanup slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_cleanup_delay);
+ if (!use_softirq)
+ pr_info("\tRCU_SOFTIRQ processing moved to rcuc kthreads.\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG))
+ pr_info("\tRCU debug extended QS entry/exit.\n");
+ rcupdate_announce_bootup_oddness();
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+
+static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, bool wake);
+static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
+
+/*
+ * Tell them what RCU they are running.
+ */
+static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
+{
+ pr_info("Preemptible hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
+ rcu_bootup_announce_oddness();
+}
+
+/* Flags for rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue() decision table. */
+#define RCU_GP_TASKS 0x8
+#define RCU_EXP_TASKS 0x4
+#define RCU_GP_BLKD 0x2
+#define RCU_EXP_BLKD 0x1
+
+/*
+ * Queues a task preempted within an RCU-preempt read-side critical
+ * section into the appropriate location within the ->blkd_tasks list,
+ * depending on the states of any ongoing normal and expedited grace
+ * periods. The ->gp_tasks pointer indicates which element the normal
+ * grace period is waiting on (NULL if none), and the ->exp_tasks pointer
+ * indicates which element the expedited grace period is waiting on (again,
+ * NULL if none). If a grace period is waiting on a given element in the
+ * ->blkd_tasks list, it also waits on all subsequent elements. Thus,
+ * adding a task to the tail of the list blocks any grace period that is
+ * already waiting on one of the elements. In contrast, adding a task
+ * to the head of the list won't block any grace period that is already
+ * waiting on one of the elements.
+ *
+ * This queuing is imprecise, and can sometimes make an ongoing grace
+ * period wait for a task that is not strictly speaking blocking it.
+ * Given the choice, we needlessly block a normal grace period rather than
+ * blocking an expedited grace period.
+ *
+ * Note that an endless sequence of expedited grace periods still cannot
+ * indefinitely postpone a normal grace period. Eventually, all of the
+ * fixed number of preempted tasks blocking the normal grace period that are
+ * not also blocking the expedited grace period will resume and complete
+ * their RCU read-side critical sections. At that point, the ->gp_tasks
+ * pointer will equal the ->exp_tasks pointer, at which point the end of
+ * the corresponding expedited grace period will also be the end of the
+ * normal grace period.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+ __releases(rnp->lock) /* But leaves rrupts disabled. */
+{
+ int blkd_state = (rnp->gp_tasks ? RCU_GP_TASKS : 0) +
+ (rnp->exp_tasks ? RCU_EXP_TASKS : 0) +
+ (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask ? RCU_GP_BLKD : 0) +
+ (rnp->expmask & rdp->grpmask ? RCU_EXP_BLKD : 0);
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+ raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->mynode != rnp);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_is_leaf_node(rnp));
+ /* RCU better not be waiting on newly onlined CPUs! */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext & ~rnp->qsmaskinit & rnp->qsmask &
+ rdp->grpmask);
+
+ /*
+ * Decide where to queue the newly blocked task. In theory,
+ * this could be an if-statement. In practice, when I tried
+ * that, it was quite messy.
+ */
+ switch (blkd_state) {
+ case 0:
+ case RCU_EXP_TASKS:
+ case RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_TASKS:
+
+ /*
+ * Blocking neither GP, or first task blocking the normal
+ * GP but not blocking the already-waiting expedited GP.
+ * Queue at the head of the list to avoid unnecessarily
+ * blocking the already-waiting GPs.
+ */
+ list_add(&t->rcu_node_entry, &rnp->blkd_tasks);
+ break;
+
+ case RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_BLKD + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+
+ /*
+ * First task arriving that blocks either GP, or first task
+ * arriving that blocks the expedited GP (with the normal
+ * GP already waiting), or a task arriving that blocks
+ * both GPs with both GPs already waiting. Queue at the
+ * tail of the list to avoid any GP waiting on any of the
+ * already queued tasks that are not blocking it.
+ */
+ list_add_tail(&t->rcu_node_entry, &rnp->blkd_tasks);
+ break;
+
+ case RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_BLKD:
+
+ /*
+ * Second or subsequent task blocking the expedited GP.
+ * The task either does not block the normal GP, or is the
+ * first task blocking the normal GP. Queue just after
+ * the first task blocking the expedited GP.
+ */
+ list_add(&t->rcu_node_entry, rnp->exp_tasks);
+ break;
+
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD:
+ case RCU_GP_TASKS + RCU_EXP_TASKS + RCU_GP_BLKD:
+
+ /*
+ * Second or subsequent task blocking the normal GP.
+ * The task does not block the expedited GP. Queue just
+ * after the first task blocking the normal GP.
+ */
+ list_add(&t->rcu_node_entry, rnp->gp_tasks);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+
+ /* Yet another exercise in excessive paranoia. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We have now queued the task. If it was the first one to
+ * block either grace period, update the ->gp_tasks and/or
+ * ->exp_tasks pointers, respectively, to reference the newly
+ * blocked tasks.
+ */
+ if (!rnp->gp_tasks && (blkd_state & RCU_GP_BLKD)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, &t->rcu_node_entry);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completedqs == rnp->gp_seq);
+ }
+ if (!rnp->exp_tasks && (blkd_state & RCU_EXP_BLKD))
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, &t->rcu_node_entry);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(blkd_state & RCU_GP_BLKD) !=
+ !(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(blkd_state & RCU_EXP_BLKD) !=
+ !(rnp->expmask & rdp->grpmask));
+ raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp); /* interrupts remain disabled. */
+
+ /*
+ * Report the quiescent state for the expedited GP. This expedited
+ * GP should not be able to end until we report, so there should be
+ * no need to check for a subsequent expedited GP. (Though we are
+ * still in a quiescent state in any case.)
+ *
+ * Interrupts are disabled, so ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp cannot change.
+ */
+ if (blkd_state & RCU_EXP_BLKD && rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)
+ rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Record a preemptible-RCU quiescent state for the specified CPU.
+ * Note that this does not necessarily mean that the task currently running
+ * on the CPU is in a quiescent state: Instead, it means that the current
+ * grace period need not wait on any RCU read-side critical section that
+ * starts later on this CPU. It also means that if the current task is
+ * in an RCU read-side critical section, it has already added itself to
+ * some leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list. In addition to the
+ * current task, there might be any number of other tasks blocked while
+ * in an RCU read-side critical section.
+ *
+ * Unlike non-preemptible-RCU, quiescent state reports for expedited
+ * grace periods are handled separately via deferred quiescent states
+ * and context switch events.
+ *
+ * Callers to this function must disable preemption.
+ */
+static void rcu_qs(void)
+{
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(preemptible(), "rcu_qs() invoked with preemption enabled!!!\n");
+ if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm)) {
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.gp_seq),
+ TPS("cpuqs"));
+ __this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
+ barrier(); /* Coordinate with rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(). */
+ WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, false);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * We have entered the scheduler, and the current task might soon be
+ * context-switched away from. If this task is in an RCU read-side
+ * critical section, we will no longer be able to rely on the CPU to
+ * record that fact, so we enqueue the task on the blkd_tasks list.
+ * The task will dequeue itself when it exits the outermost enclosing
+ * RCU read-side critical section. Therefore, the current grace period
+ * cannot be permitted to complete until the blkd_tasks list entries
+ * predating the current grace period drain, in other words, until
+ * rnp->gp_tasks becomes NULL.
+ *
+ * Caller must disable interrupts.
+ */
+void rcu_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start context switch"));
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ WARN_ONCE(!preempt && rcu_preempt_depth() > 0, "Voluntary context switch within RCU read-side critical section!");
+ if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0 &&
+ !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) {
+
+ /* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
+ rnp = rdp->mynode;
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp);
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
+ t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp;
+
+ /*
+ * Verify the CPU's sanity, trace the preemption, and
+ * then queue the task as required based on the states
+ * of any ongoing and expedited grace periods.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&t->rcu_node_entry));
+ trace_rcu_preempt_task(rcu_state.name,
+ t->pid,
+ (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask)
+ ? rnp->gp_seq
+ : rcu_seq_snap(&rnp->gp_seq));
+ rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue(rnp, rdp);
+ } else {
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(t);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Either we were not in an RCU read-side critical section to
+ * begin with, or we have now recorded that critical section
+ * globally. Either way, we can now note a quiescent state
+ * for this CPU. Again, if we were in an RCU read-side critical
+ * section, and if that critical section was blocking the current
+ * grace period, then the fact that the task has been enqueued
+ * means that we continue to block the current grace period.
+ */
+ rcu_qs();
+ if (rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)
+ rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
+ rcu_tasks_qs(current, preempt);
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End context switch"));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
+
+/*
+ * Check for preempted RCU readers blocking the current grace period
+ * for the specified rcu_node structure. If the caller needs a reliable
+ * answer, it must hold the rcu_node's ->lock.
+ */
+static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks) != NULL;
+}
+
+/* limit value for ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. */
+#define RCU_NEST_PMAX (INT_MAX / 2)
+
+static void rcu_preempt_read_enter(void)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_lock_nesting, READ_ONCE(current->rcu_read_lock_nesting) + 1);
+}
+
+static int rcu_preempt_read_exit(void)
+{
+ int ret = READ_ONCE(current->rcu_read_lock_nesting) - 1;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_lock_nesting, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void rcu_preempt_depth_set(int val)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_lock_nesting, val);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
+ * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
+ * if we block.
+ */
+void __rcu_read_lock(void)
+{
+ rcu_preempt_read_enter();
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth() > RCU_NEST_PMAX);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) && rcu_state.gp_kthread)
+ WRITE_ONCE(current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true);
+ barrier(); /* critical section after entry code. */
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
+
+/*
+ * Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
+ * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
+ * rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
+ * invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
+ * in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
+ */
+void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+ barrier(); // critical section before exit code.
+ if (rcu_preempt_read_exit() == 0) {
+ barrier(); // critical-section exit before .s check.
+ if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s)))
+ rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
+ }
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
+ int rrln = rcu_preempt_depth();
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 || rrln > RCU_NEST_PMAX);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
+
+/*
+ * Advance a ->blkd_tasks-list pointer to the next entry, instead
+ * returning NULL if at the end of the list.
+ */
+static struct list_head *rcu_next_node_entry(struct task_struct *t,
+ struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ struct list_head *np;
+
+ np = t->rcu_node_entry.next;
+ if (np == &rnp->blkd_tasks)
+ np = NULL;
+ return np;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return true if the specified rcu_node structure has tasks that were
+ * preempted within an RCU read-side critical section.
+ */
+static bool rcu_preempt_has_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ return !list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Report deferred quiescent states. The deferral time can
+ * be quite short, for example, in the case of the call from
+ * rcu_read_unlock_special().
+ */
+static notrace void
+rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ bool empty_exp;
+ bool empty_norm;
+ bool empty_exp_now;
+ struct list_head *np;
+ bool drop_boost_mutex = false;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
+ union rcu_special special;
+
+ /*
+ * If RCU core is waiting for this CPU to exit its critical section,
+ * report the fact that it has exited. Because irqs are disabled,
+ * t->rcu_read_unlock_special cannot change.
+ */
+ special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
+ rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+ if (!special.s && !rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp) {
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s = 0;
+ if (special.b.need_qs) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD)) {
+ rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm = false;
+ rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp);
+ udelay(rcu_unlock_delay);
+ } else {
+ rcu_qs();
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Respond to a request by an expedited grace period for a
+ * quiescent state from this CPU. Note that requests from
+ * tasks are handled when removing the task from the
+ * blocked-tasks list below.
+ */
+ if (rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)
+ rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
+
+ /* Clean up if blocked during RCU read-side critical section. */
+ if (special.b.blocked) {
+
+ /*
+ * Remove this task from the list it blocked on. The task
+ * now remains queued on the rcu_node corresponding to the
+ * CPU it first blocked on, so there is no longer any need
+ * to loop. Retain a WARN_ON_ONCE() out of sheer paranoia.
+ */
+ rnp = t->rcu_blocked_node;
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp != t->rcu_blocked_node);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_is_leaf_node(rnp));
+ empty_norm = !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completedqs == rnp->gp_seq &&
+ (!empty_norm || rnp->qsmask));
+ empty_exp = sync_rcu_exp_done(rnp);
+ smp_mb(); /* ensure expedited fastpath sees end of RCU c-s. */
+ np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp);
+ list_del_init(&t->rcu_node_entry);
+ t->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
+ trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(TPS("rcu_preempt"),
+ rnp->gp_seq, t->pid);
+ if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->gp_tasks)
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, np);
+ if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST)) {
+ /* Snapshot ->boost_mtx ownership w/rnp->lock held. */
+ drop_boost_mutex = rt_mutex_owner(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex) == t;
+ if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->boost_tasks)
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks, np);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If this was the last task on the current list, and if
+ * we aren't waiting on any CPUs, report the quiescent state.
+ * Note that rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() releases rnp->lock,
+ * so we must take a snapshot of the expedited state.
+ */
+ empty_exp_now = sync_rcu_exp_done(rnp);
+ if (!empty_norm && !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) {
+ trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(TPS("preempt_rcu"),
+ rnp->gp_seq,
+ 0, rnp->qsmask,
+ rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo,
+ rnp->grphi,
+ !!rnp->gp_tasks);
+ rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
+ } else {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If this was the last task on the expedited lists,
+ * then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy.
+ */
+ if (!empty_exp && empty_exp_now)
+ rcu_report_exp_rnp(rnp, true);
+
+ /* Unboost if we were boosted. */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && drop_boost_mutex)
+ rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex);
+ } else {
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is a deferred quiescent-state pending, and are we also not in
+ * an RCU read-side critical section? It is the caller's responsibility
+ * to ensure it is otherwise safe to report any deferred quiescent
+ * states. The reason for this is that it is safe to report a
+ * quiescent state during context switch even though preemption
+ * is disabled. This function cannot be expected to understand these
+ * nuances, so the caller must handle them.
+ */
+static notrace bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ return (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp) ||
+ READ_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.s)) &&
+ rcu_preempt_depth() == 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Report a deferred quiescent state if needed and safe to do so.
+ * As with rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(), "safe" involves only
+ * not being in an RCU read-side critical section. The caller must
+ * evaluate safety in terms of interrupt, softirq, and preemption
+ * disabling.
+ */
+notrace void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t))
+ return;
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Minimal handler to give the scheduler a chance to re-evaluate.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+
+ rdp = container_of(iwp, struct rcu_data, defer_qs_iw);
+ rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle special cases during rcu_read_unlock(), such as needing to
+ * notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
+ * read-side critical section.
+ */
+static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool irqs_were_disabled;
+ bool preempt_bh_were_disabled =
+ !!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK));
+
+ /* NMI handlers cannot block and cannot safely manipulate state. */
+ if (in_nmi())
+ return;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ irqs_were_disabled = irqs_disabled_flags(flags);
+ if (preempt_bh_were_disabled || irqs_were_disabled) {
+ bool expboost; // Expedited GP in flight or possible boosting.
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+
+ expboost = (t->rcu_blocked_node && READ_ONCE(t->rcu_blocked_node->exp_tasks)) ||
+ (rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask)) ||
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
+ ((rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)) || t->rcu_blocked_node)) ||
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && irqs_were_disabled &&
+ t->rcu_blocked_node);
+ // Need to defer quiescent state until everything is enabled.
+ if (use_softirq && (in_hardirq() || (expboost && !irqs_were_disabled))) {
+ // Using softirq, safe to awaken, and either the
+ // wakeup is free or there is either an expedited
+ // GP in flight or a potential need to deboost.
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
+ } else {
+ // Enabling BH or preempt does reschedule, so...
+ // Also if no expediting and no possible deboosting,
+ // slow is OK. Plus nohz_full CPUs eventually get
+ // tick enabled.
+ set_tsk_need_resched(current);
+ set_preempt_need_resched();
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && irqs_were_disabled &&
+ expboost && !rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
+ // Get scheduler to re-evaluate and call hooks.
+ // If !IRQ_WORK, FQS scan will eventually IPI.
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ rdp->defer_qs_iw = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler);
+ else
+ init_irq_work(&rdp->defer_qs_iw,
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler);
+ rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending = true;
+ irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->defer_qs_iw, rdp->cpu);
+ }
+ }
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
+ * period is in fact empty. It is a serious bug to complete a grace
+ * period that still has RCU readers blocked! This function must be
+ * invoked -before- updating this rnp's ->gp_seq.
+ *
+ * Also, if there are blocked tasks on the list, they automatically
+ * block the newly created grace period, so set up ->gp_tasks accordingly.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(preemptible(), "rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks() invoked with preemption enabled!!!\n");
+ raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)))
+ dump_blkd_tasks(rnp, 10);
+ if (rcu_preempt_has_tasks(rnp) &&
+ (rnp->qsmaskinit || rnp->wait_blkd_tasks)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks, rnp->blkd_tasks.next);
+ t = container_of(rnp->gp_tasks, struct task_struct,
+ rcu_node_entry);
+ trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(TPS("rcu_preempt-GPS"),
+ rnp->gp_seq, t->pid);
+ }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check for a quiescent state from the current CPU, including voluntary
+ * context switches for Tasks RCU. When a task blocks, the task is
+ * recorded in the corresponding CPU's rcu_node structure, which is checked
+ * elsewhere, hence this function need only check for quiescent states
+ * related to the current CPU, not to those related to tasks.
+ */
+static void rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(int user)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0 ||
+ (preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK))) {
+ /* No QS, force context switch if deferred. */
+ if (rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t)) {
+ set_tsk_need_resched(t);
+ set_preempt_need_resched();
+ }
+ } else if (rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t)) {
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(t); /* Report deferred QS. */
+ return;
+ } else if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_depth())) {
+ rcu_qs(); /* Report immediate QS. */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If GP is oldish, ask for help from rcu_read_unlock_special(). */
+ if (rcu_preempt_depth() > 0 &&
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.core_needs_qs) &&
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm) &&
+ !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs &&
+ time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + HZ))
+ t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
+ * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings, as
+ * debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep is enabled.
+ * Besides, if this function does anything other than just immediately
+ * return, there was a bug of some sort. Spewing warnings from this
+ * function is like as not to simply obscure important prior warnings.
+ */
+void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&current->rcu_node_entry))) {
+ rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
+ barrier();
+ WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked, true);
+ } else if (unlikely(rcu_preempt_depth())) {
+ rcu_preempt_depth_set(1);
+ } else {
+ return;
+ }
+ __rcu_read_unlock();
+ rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(current);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Dump the blocked-tasks state, but limit the list dump to the
+ * specified number of elements.
+ */
+static void
+dump_blkd_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp, int ncheck)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ int i;
+ struct list_head *lhp;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp1;
+
+ raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
+ pr_info("%s: grp: %d-%d level: %d ->gp_seq %ld ->completedqs %ld\n",
+ __func__, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, rnp->level,
+ (long)READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq), (long)rnp->completedqs);
+ for (rnp1 = rnp; rnp1; rnp1 = rnp1->parent)
+ pr_info("%s: %d:%d ->qsmask %#lx ->qsmaskinit %#lx ->qsmaskinitnext %#lx\n",
+ __func__, rnp1->grplo, rnp1->grphi, rnp1->qsmask, rnp1->qsmaskinit, rnp1->qsmaskinitnext);
+ pr_info("%s: ->gp_tasks %p ->boost_tasks %p ->exp_tasks %p\n",
+ __func__, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_tasks), data_race(rnp->boost_tasks),
+ READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks));
+ pr_info("%s: ->blkd_tasks", __func__);
+ i = 0;
+ list_for_each(lhp, &rnp->blkd_tasks) {
+ pr_cont(" %p", lhp);
+ if (++i >= ncheck)
+ break;
+ }
+ pr_cont("\n");
+ for (cpu = rnp->grplo; cpu <= rnp->grphi; cpu++) {
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+ pr_info("\t%d: %c online: %ld(%d) offline: %ld(%d)\n",
+ cpu, ".o"[rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp)],
+ (long)rdp->rcu_onl_gp_seq, rdp->rcu_onl_gp_flags,
+ (long)rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_seq, rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_flags);
+ }
+}
+
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
+/*
+ * If strict grace periods are enabled, and if the calling
+ * __rcu_read_unlock() marks the beginning of a quiescent state, immediately
+ * report that quiescent state and, if requested, spin for a bit.
+ */
+void rcu_read_unlock_strict(void)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+
+ if (irqs_disabled() || preempt_count() || !rcu_state.gp_kthread)
+ return;
+ rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+ rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm = false;
+ rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp);
+ udelay(rcu_unlock_delay);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_unlock_strict);
+
+/*
+ * Tell them what RCU they are running.
+ */
+static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
+{
+ pr_info("Hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
+ rcu_bootup_announce_oddness();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note a quiescent state for PREEMPTION=n. Because we do not need to know
+ * how many quiescent states passed, just if there was at least one since
+ * the start of the grace period, this just sets a flag. The caller must
+ * have disabled preemption.
+ */
+static void rcu_qs(void)
+{
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(preemptible(), "rcu_qs() invoked with preemption enabled!!!");
+ if (!__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.s))
+ return;
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(TPS("rcu_sched"),
+ __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.gp_seq), TPS("cpuqs"));
+ __this_cpu_write(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.norm, false);
+ if (__this_cpu_read(rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp))
+ rcu_report_exp_rdp(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Register an urgently needed quiescent state. If there is an
+ * emergency, invoke rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() to do a heavy-weight
+ * dyntick-idle quiescent state visible to other CPUs, which will in
+ * some cases serve for expedited as well as normal grace periods.
+ * Either way, register a lightweight quiescent state.
+ */
+void rcu_all_qs(void)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs))
+ return;
+ preempt_disable(); // For CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y kernels
+ /* Load rcu_urgent_qs before other flags. */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs))) {
+ preempt_enable();
+ return;
+ }
+ this_cpu_write(rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs, false);
+ if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.rcu_need_heavy_qs))) {
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ }
+ rcu_qs();
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_all_qs);
+
+/*
+ * Note a PREEMPTION=n context switch. The caller must have disabled interrupts.
+ */
+void rcu_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
+{
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start context switch"));
+ rcu_qs();
+ /* Load rcu_urgent_qs before other flags. */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs)))
+ goto out;
+ this_cpu_write(rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs, false);
+ if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.rcu_need_heavy_qs)))
+ rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
+out:
+ rcu_tasks_qs(current, preempt);
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End context switch"));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_note_context_switch);
+
+/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, there are never any preempted
+ * RCU readers.
+ */
+static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked.
+ */
+static bool rcu_preempt_has_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no deferred quiescent
+ * states.
+ */
+static notrace bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+// Except that we do need to respond to a request by an expedited
+// grace period for a quiescent state from this CPU. Note that in
+// non-preemptible kernels, there can be no context switches within RCU
+// read-side critical sections, which in turn means that the leaf rcu_node
+// structure's blocked-tasks list is always empty. is therefore no need to
+// actually check it. Instead, a quiescent state from this CPU suffices,
+// and this function is only called from such a quiescent state.
+notrace void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp))
+ rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
+ * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks. So check only for
+ * bogus qsmask values.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if this CPU is in a non-context-switch quiescent state,
+ * namely user mode and idle loop.
+ */
+static void rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(int user)
+{
+ if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
+
+ /*
+ * Get here if this CPU took its interrupt from user
+ * mode or from the idle loop, and if this is not a
+ * nested interrupt. In this case, the CPU is in
+ * a quiescent state, so note it.
+ *
+ * No memory barrier is required here because rcu_qs()
+ * references only CPU-local variables that other CPUs
+ * neither access nor modify, at least not while the
+ * corresponding CPU is online.
+ */
+ rcu_qs();
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, tasks cannot possibly exit
+ * while in preemptible RCU read-side critical sections.
+ */
+void exit_rcu(void)
+{
+}
+
+/*
+ * Dump the guaranteed-empty blocked-tasks state. Trust but verify.
+ */
+static void
+dump_blkd_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp, int ncheck)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks));
+}
+
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
+/*
+ * If boosting, set rcuc kthreads to realtime priority.
+ */
+static void rcu_cpu_kthread_setup(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
+ struct sched_param sp;
+
+ sp.sched_priority = kthread_prio;
+ sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(rdp->rcuc_activity, jiffies);
+}
+
+static bool rcu_is_callbacks_nocb_kthread(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+ return rdp->nocb_cb_kthread == current;
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is the current CPU running the RCU-callbacks kthread?
+ * Caller must have preemption disabled.
+ */
+static bool rcu_is_callbacks_kthread(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ return rdp->rcu_cpu_kthread_task == current ||
+ rcu_is_callbacks_nocb_kthread(rdp);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
+
+/*
+ * Carry out RCU priority boosting on the task indicated by ->exp_tasks
+ * or ->boost_tasks, advancing the pointer to the next task in the
+ * ->blkd_tasks list.
+ *
+ * Note that irqs must be enabled: boosting the task can block.
+ * Returns 1 if there are more tasks needing to be boosted.
+ */
+static int rcu_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct task_struct *t;
+ struct list_head *tb;
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) == NULL &&
+ READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks) == NULL)
+ return 0; /* Nothing left to boost. */
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+
+ /*
+ * Recheck under the lock: all tasks in need of boosting
+ * might exit their RCU read-side critical sections on their own.
+ */
+ if (rnp->exp_tasks == NULL && rnp->boost_tasks == NULL) {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Preferentially boost tasks blocking expedited grace periods.
+ * This cannot starve the normal grace periods because a second
+ * expedited grace period must boost all blocked tasks, including
+ * those blocking the pre-existing normal grace period.
+ */
+ if (rnp->exp_tasks != NULL)
+ tb = rnp->exp_tasks;
+ else
+ tb = rnp->boost_tasks;
+
+ /*
+ * We boost task t by manufacturing an rt_mutex that appears to
+ * be held by task t. We leave a pointer to that rt_mutex where
+ * task t can find it, and task t will release the mutex when it
+ * exits its outermost RCU read-side critical section. Then
+ * simply acquiring this artificial rt_mutex will boost task
+ * t's priority. (Thanks to tglx for suggesting this approach!)
+ *
+ * Note that task t must acquire rnp->lock to remove itself from
+ * the ->blkd_tasks list, which it will do from exit() if from
+ * nowhere else. We therefore are guaranteed that task t will
+ * stay around at least until we drop rnp->lock. Note that
+ * rnp->lock also resolves races between our priority boosting
+ * and task t's exiting its outermost RCU read-side critical
+ * section.
+ */
+ t = container_of(tb, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
+ rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&rnp->boost_mtx.rtmutex, t);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ /* Lock only for side effect: boosts task t's priority. */
+ rt_mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_mtx);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_mtx); /* Then keep lockdep happy. */
+ rnp->n_boosts++;
+
+ return READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL ||
+ READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks) != NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Priority-boosting kthread, one per leaf rcu_node.
+ */
+static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg)
+{
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = (struct rcu_node *)arg;
+ int spincnt = 0;
+ int more2boost;
+
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start boost kthread@init"));
+ for (;;) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING);
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End boost kthread@rcu_wait"));
+ rcu_wait(READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks) ||
+ READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks));
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start boost kthread@rcu_wait"));
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING);
+ more2boost = rcu_boost(rnp);
+ if (more2boost)
+ spincnt++;
+ else
+ spincnt = 0;
+ if (spincnt > 10) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_status, RCU_KTHREAD_YIELDING);
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End boost kthread@rcu_yield"));
+ schedule_timeout_idle(2);
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start boost kthread@rcu_yield"));
+ spincnt = 0;
+ }
+ }
+ /* NOTREACHED */
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End boost kthread@notreached"));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if it is time to start boosting RCU readers that are
+ * blocking the current grace period, and, if so, tell the per-rcu_node
+ * kthread to start boosting them. If there is an expedited grace
+ * period in progress, it is always time to boost.
+ *
+ * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases.
+ * The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, so we don't need to worry
+ * about it going away.
+ */
+static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
+ __releases(rnp->lock)
+{
+ raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
+ if (!rnp->boost_kthread_task ||
+ (!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp) && !rnp->exp_tasks)) {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ if (rnp->exp_tasks != NULL ||
+ (rnp->gp_tasks != NULL &&
+ rnp->boost_tasks == NULL &&
+ rnp->qsmask == 0 &&
+ (!time_after(rnp->boost_time, jiffies) || rcu_state.cbovld ||
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD)))) {
+ if (rnp->exp_tasks == NULL)
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks, rnp->gp_tasks);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ rcu_wake_cond(rnp->boost_kthread_task,
+ READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_kthread_status));
+ } else {
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ }
+}
+
+#define RCU_BOOST_DELAY_JIFFIES DIV_ROUND_UP(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY * HZ, 1000)
+
+/*
+ * Do priority-boost accounting for the start of a new grace period.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ rnp->boost_time = jiffies + RCU_BOOST_DELAY_JIFFIES;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create an RCU-boost kthread for the specified node if one does not
+ * already exist. We only create this kthread for preemptible RCU.
+ */
+static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int rnp_index = rnp - rcu_get_root();
+ struct sched_param sp;
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+ if (rnp->boost_kthread_task || !rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
+ goto out;
+
+ t = kthread_create(rcu_boost_kthread, (void *)rnp,
+ "rcub/%d", rnp_index);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(t)))
+ goto out;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ sp.sched_priority = kthread_prio;
+ sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
+ wake_up_process(t); /* get to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE quickly. */
+
+ out:
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Set the per-rcu_node kthread's affinity to cover all CPUs that are
+ * served by the rcu_node in question. The CPU hotplug lock is still
+ * held, so the value of rnp->qsmaskinit will be stable.
+ *
+ * We don't include outgoingcpu in the affinity set, use -1 if there is
+ * no outgoing CPU. If there are no CPUs left in the affinity set,
+ * this function allows the kthread to execute on any CPU.
+ */
+static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t = rnp->boost_kthread_task;
+ unsigned long mask = rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp);
+ cpumask_var_t cm;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!t)
+ return;
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return;
+ mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+ for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+ if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
+ cpu != outgoingcpu)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
+ cpumask_and(cm, cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
+ if (cpumask_empty(cm)) {
+ cpumask_copy(cm, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_RCU));
+ if (outgoingcpu >= 0)
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(outgoingcpu, cm);
+ }
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, cm);
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
+ free_cpumask_var(cm);
+}
+
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
+
+static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
+ __releases(rnp->lock)
+{
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+}
+
+static void rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+}
+
+static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+}
+
+static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
+{
+}
+
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
+
+/*
+ * Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU so that the
+ * grace-period kthread will do force_quiescent_state() processing?
+ * The idea is to avoid waking up RCU core processing on such a
+ * CPU unless the grace period has extended for too long.
+ *
+ * This code relies on the fact that all NO_HZ_FULL CPUs are also
+ * RCU_NOCB_CPU CPUs.
+ */
+static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+ if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()) &&
+ (!rcu_gp_in_progress() ||
+ time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_start) + HZ)))
+ return true;
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Bind the RCU grace-period kthreads to the housekeeping CPU.
+ */
+static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
+{
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ return;
+ housekeeping_affine(current, HK_TYPE_RCU);
+}