diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000 |
commit | 2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4 (patch) | |
tree | 848558de17fb3008cdf4d861b01ac7781903ce39 /lib/list_debug.c | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.tar.xz linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.zip |
Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/list_debug.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/list_debug.c | 70 |
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d98d43f80 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/list_debug.c @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +/* + * Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones + * Released under the General Public License (GPL). + * + * This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST. + */ + +#include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/rculist.h> + +/* + * Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably + * valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit + * attempt). + */ + +bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev, + struct list_head *next) +{ + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, + "list_add corruption. prev is NULL.\n") || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, + "list_add corruption. next is NULL.\n") || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev, + "list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n", + prev, next->prev, next) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next, + "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n", + next, prev->next, prev) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next, + "list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n", + new, prev, next)) + return false; + + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid); + +bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry) +{ + struct list_head *prev, *next; + + prev = entry->prev; + next = entry->next; + + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, + "list_del corruption, %px->next is NULL\n", entry) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, + "list_del corruption, %px->prev is NULL\n", entry) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1, + "list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n", + entry, LIST_POISON1) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2, + "list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n", + entry, LIST_POISON2) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry, + "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n", + entry, prev->next, prev) || + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry, + "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n", + entry, next->prev, next)) + return false; + + return true; + +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid); |