From 2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 20:49:45 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 6.1.76. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 727 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 727 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..47041ec68 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h @@ -0,0 +1,727 @@ +/* + * Copyright © 2008-2018 Intel Corporation + * + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + * + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the + * Software. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS + * IN THE SOFTWARE. + * + */ + +#ifndef I915_REQUEST_H +#define I915_REQUEST_H + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "gem/i915_gem_context_types.h" +#include "gt/intel_context_types.h" +#include "gt/intel_engine_types.h" +#include "gt/intel_timeline_types.h" + +#include "i915_gem.h" +#include "i915_scheduler.h" +#include "i915_selftest.h" +#include "i915_sw_fence.h" +#include "i915_vma_resource.h" + +#include + +struct drm_file; +struct drm_i915_gem_object; +struct drm_printer; +struct i915_deps; +struct i915_request; + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR) +struct i915_capture_list { + struct i915_vma_resource *vma_res; + struct i915_capture_list *next; +}; + +void i915_request_free_capture_list(struct i915_capture_list *capture); +#else +#define i915_request_free_capture_list(_a) do {} while (0) +#endif + +#define RQ_TRACE(rq, fmt, ...) do { \ + const struct i915_request *rq__ = (rq); \ + ENGINE_TRACE(rq__->engine, "fence %llx:%lld, current %d " fmt, \ + rq__->fence.context, rq__->fence.seqno, \ + hwsp_seqno(rq__), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ +} while (0) + +enum { + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE - this request is currently submitted to HW. + * + * Set by __i915_request_submit() on handing over to HW, and cleared + * by __i915_request_unsubmit() if we preempt this request. + * + * Finally cleared for consistency on retiring the request, when + * we know the HW is no longer running this request. + * + * See i915_request_is_active() + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE = DMA_FENCE_FLAG_USER_BITS, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE - this request is ready for execution + * + * Using the scheduler, when a request is ready for execution it is put + * into the priority queue, and removed from that queue when transferred + * to the HW runlists. We want to track its membership within the + * priority queue so that we can easily check before rescheduling. + * + * See i915_request_in_priority_queue() + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD - this request is currently on hold + * + * This request has been suspended, pending an ongoing investigation. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_INITIAL_BREADCRUMB - this request has the initial + * breadcrumb that marks the end of semaphore waits and start of the + * user payload. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_INITIAL_BREADCRUMB, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL - this request is currently on signal_list + * + * Internal bookkeeping used by the breadcrumb code to track when + * a request is on the various signal_list. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_NOPREEMPT - this request should not be preempted + * + * The execution of some requests should not be interrupted. This is + * a sensitive operation as it makes the request super important, + * blocking other higher priority work. Abuse of this flag will + * lead to quality of service issues. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_NOPREEMPT, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_SENTINEL - this request should be last in the queue + * + * A high priority sentinel request may be submitted to clear the + * submission queue. As it will be the only request in-flight, upon + * execution all other active requests will have been preempted and + * unsubmitted. This preemptive pulse is used to re-evaluate the + * in-flight requests, particularly in cases where an active context + * is banned and those active requests need to be cancelled. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_SENTINEL, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST - upclock the gpu for this request + * + * Some requests are more important than others! In particular, a + * request that the user is waiting on is typically required for + * interactive latency, for which we want to minimise by upclocking + * the GPU. Here we track such boost requests on a per-request basis. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_SUBMIT_PARALLEL - request with a context in a + * parent-child relationship (parallel submission, multi-lrc) should + * trigger a submission to the GuC rather than just moving the context + * tail. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_SUBMIT_PARALLEL, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_SKIP_PARALLEL - request with a context in a + * parent-child relationship (parallel submission, multi-lrc) that + * hit an error while generating requests in the execbuf IOCTL. + * Indicates this request should be skipped as another request in + * submission / relationship encoutered an error. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_SKIP_PARALLEL, + + /* + * I915_FENCE_FLAG_COMPOSITE - Indicates fence is part of a composite + * fence (dma_fence_array) and i915 generated for parallel submission. + */ + I915_FENCE_FLAG_COMPOSITE, +}; + +/** + * Request queue structure. + * + * The request queue allows us to note sequence numbers that have been emitted + * and may be associated with active buffers to be retired. + * + * By keeping this list, we can avoid having to do questionable sequence + * number comparisons on buffer last_read|write_seqno. It also allows an + * emission time to be associated with the request for tracking how far ahead + * of the GPU the submission is. + * + * When modifying this structure be very aware that we perform a lockless + * RCU lookup of it that may race against reallocation of the struct + * from the slab freelist. We intentionally do not zero the structure on + * allocation so that the lookup can use the dangling pointers (and is + * cogniscent that those pointers may be wrong). Instead, everything that + * needs to be initialised must be done so explicitly. + * + * The requests are reference counted. + */ +struct i915_request { + struct dma_fence fence; + spinlock_t lock; + + struct drm_i915_private *i915; + + /** + * Context and ring buffer related to this request + * Contexts are refcounted, so when this request is associated with a + * context, we must increment the context's refcount, to guarantee that + * it persists while any request is linked to it. Requests themselves + * are also refcounted, so the request will only be freed when the last + * reference to it is dismissed, and the code in + * i915_request_free() will then decrement the refcount on the + * context. + */ + struct intel_engine_cs *engine; + struct intel_context *context; + struct intel_ring *ring; + struct intel_timeline __rcu *timeline; + + struct list_head signal_link; + struct llist_node signal_node; + + /* + * The rcu epoch of when this request was allocated. Used to judiciously + * apply backpressure on future allocations to ensure that under + * mempressure there is sufficient RCU ticks for us to reclaim our + * RCU protected slabs. + */ + unsigned long rcustate; + + /* + * We pin the timeline->mutex while constructing the request to + * ensure that no caller accidentally drops it during construction. + * The timeline->mutex must be held to ensure that only this caller + * can use the ring and manipulate the associated timeline during + * construction. + */ + struct pin_cookie cookie; + + /* + * Fences for the various phases in the request's lifetime. + * + * The submit fence is used to await upon all of the request's + * dependencies. When it is signaled, the request is ready to run. + * It is used by the driver to then queue the request for execution. + */ + struct i915_sw_fence submit; + union { + wait_queue_entry_t submitq; + struct i915_sw_dma_fence_cb dmaq; + struct i915_request_duration_cb { + struct dma_fence_cb cb; + ktime_t emitted; + } duration; + }; + struct llist_head execute_cb; + struct i915_sw_fence semaphore; + /** + * @submit_work: complete submit fence from an IRQ if needed for + * locking hierarchy reasons. + */ + struct irq_work submit_work; + + /* + * A list of everyone we wait upon, and everyone who waits upon us. + * Even though we will not be submitted to the hardware before the + * submit fence is signaled (it waits for all external events as well + * as our own requests), the scheduler still needs to know the + * dependency tree for the lifetime of the request (from execbuf + * to retirement), i.e. bidirectional dependency information for the + * request not tied to individual fences. + */ + struct i915_sched_node sched; + struct i915_dependency dep; + intel_engine_mask_t execution_mask; + + /* + * A convenience pointer to the current breadcrumb value stored in + * the HW status page (or our timeline's local equivalent). The full + * path would be rq->hw_context->ring->timeline->hwsp_seqno. + */ + const u32 *hwsp_seqno; + + /** Position in the ring of the start of the request */ + u32 head; + + /** Position in the ring of the start of the user packets */ + u32 infix; + + /** + * Position in the ring of the start of the postfix. + * This is required to calculate the maximum available ring space + * without overwriting the postfix. + */ + u32 postfix; + + /** Position in the ring of the end of the whole request */ + u32 tail; + + /** Position in the ring of the end of any workarounds after the tail */ + u32 wa_tail; + + /** Preallocate space in the ring for the emitting the request */ + u32 reserved_space; + + /** Batch buffer pointer for selftest internal use. */ + I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(struct i915_vma *batch); + + struct i915_vma_resource *batch_res; + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR) + /** + * Additional buffers requested by userspace to be captured upon + * a GPU hang. The vma/obj on this list are protected by their + * active reference - all objects on this list must also be + * on the active_list (of their final request). + */ + struct i915_capture_list *capture_list; +#endif + + /** Time at which this request was emitted, in jiffies. */ + unsigned long emitted_jiffies; + + /** timeline->request entry for this request */ + struct list_head link; + + /** Watchdog support fields. */ + struct i915_request_watchdog { + struct llist_node link; + struct hrtimer timer; + } watchdog; + + /** + * @guc_fence_link: Requests may need to be stalled when using GuC + * submission waiting for certain GuC operations to complete. If that is + * the case, stalled requests are added to a per context list of stalled + * requests. The below list_head is the link in that list. Protected by + * ce->guc_state.lock. + */ + struct list_head guc_fence_link; + + /** + * @guc_prio: Priority level while the request is in flight. Differs + * from i915 scheduler priority. See comment above + * I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_STATIC_PRIORITY_MAP for details. Protected by + * ce->guc_active.lock. Two special values (GUC_PRIO_INIT and + * GUC_PRIO_FINI) outside the GuC priority range are used to indicate + * if the priority has not been initialized yet or if no more updates + * are possible because the request has completed. + */ +#define GUC_PRIO_INIT 0xff +#define GUC_PRIO_FINI 0xfe + u8 guc_prio; + + I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(struct { + struct list_head link; + unsigned long delay; + } mock;) +}; + +#define I915_FENCE_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN) + +extern const struct dma_fence_ops i915_fence_ops; + +static inline bool dma_fence_is_i915(const struct dma_fence *fence) +{ + return fence->ops == &i915_fence_ops; +} + +struct kmem_cache *i915_request_slab_cache(void); + +struct i915_request * __must_check +__i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp); +struct i915_request * __must_check +i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce); + +void __i915_request_skip(struct i915_request *rq); +bool i915_request_set_error_once(struct i915_request *rq, int error); +struct i915_request *i915_request_mark_eio(struct i915_request *rq); + +struct i915_request *__i915_request_commit(struct i915_request *request); +void __i915_request_queue(struct i915_request *rq, + const struct i915_sched_attr *attr); +void __i915_request_queue_bh(struct i915_request *rq); + +bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq); +void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq); + +static inline struct i915_request * +to_request(struct dma_fence *fence) +{ + /* We assume that NULL fence/request are interoperable */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct i915_request, fence) != 0); + GEM_BUG_ON(fence && !dma_fence_is_i915(fence)); + return container_of(fence, struct i915_request, fence); +} + +static inline struct i915_request * +i915_request_get(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return to_request(dma_fence_get(&rq->fence)); +} + +static inline struct i915_request * +i915_request_get_rcu(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return to_request(dma_fence_get_rcu(&rq->fence)); +} + +static inline void +i915_request_put(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + dma_fence_put(&rq->fence); +} + +int i915_request_await_object(struct i915_request *to, + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, + bool write); +int i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, + struct dma_fence *fence); +int i915_request_await_deps(struct i915_request *rq, const struct i915_deps *deps); +int i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, + struct dma_fence *fence); + +void i915_request_add(struct i915_request *rq); + +bool __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request); +void i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request); + +void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request); +void i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request); + +void i915_request_cancel(struct i915_request *rq, int error); + +long i915_request_wait_timeout(struct i915_request *rq, + unsigned int flags, + long timeout) + __attribute__((nonnull(1))); + +long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq, + unsigned int flags, + long timeout) + __attribute__((nonnull(1))); +#define I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE BIT(0) +#define I915_WAIT_PRIORITY BIT(1) /* small priority bump for the request */ +#define I915_WAIT_ALL BIT(2) /* used by i915_gem_object_wait() */ + +void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m, + const struct i915_request *rq, + const char *prefix, + int indent); + +static inline bool i915_request_signaled(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + /* The request may live longer than its HWSP, so check flags first! */ + return test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_is_active(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_in_priority_queue(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline bool +i915_request_has_initial_breadcrumb(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_INITIAL_BREADCRUMB, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +/** + * Returns true if seq1 is later than seq2. + */ +static inline bool i915_seqno_passed(u32 seq1, u32 seq2) +{ + return (s32)(seq1 - seq2) >= 0; +} + +static inline u32 __hwsp_seqno(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + const u32 *hwsp = READ_ONCE(rq->hwsp_seqno); + + return READ_ONCE(*hwsp); +} + +/** + * hwsp_seqno - the current breadcrumb value in the HW status page + * @rq: the request, to chase the relevant HW status page + * + * The emphasis in naming here is that hwsp_seqno() is not a property of the + * request, but an indication of the current HW state (associated with this + * request). Its value will change as the GPU executes more requests. + * + * Returns the current breadcrumb value in the associated HW status page (or + * the local timeline's equivalent) for this request. The request itself + * has the associated breadcrumb value of rq->fence.seqno, when the HW + * status page has that breadcrumb or later, this request is complete. + */ +static inline u32 hwsp_seqno(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + u32 seqno; + + rcu_read_lock(); /* the HWSP may be freed at runtime */ + seqno = __hwsp_seqno(rq); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return seqno; +} + +static inline bool __i915_request_has_started(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return i915_seqno_passed(__hwsp_seqno(rq), rq->fence.seqno - 1); +} + +/** + * i915_request_started - check if the request has begun being executed + * @rq: the request + * + * If the timeline is not using initial breadcrumbs, a request is + * considered started if the previous request on its timeline (i.e. + * context) has been signaled. + * + * If the timeline is using semaphores, it will also be emitting an + * "initial breadcrumb" after the semaphores are complete and just before + * it began executing the user payload. A request can therefore be active + * on the HW and not yet started as it is still busywaiting on its + * dependencies (via HW semaphores). + * + * If the request has started, its dependencies will have been signaled + * (either by fences or by semaphores) and it will have begun processing + * the user payload. + * + * However, even if a request has started, it may have been preempted and + * so no longer active, or it may have already completed. + * + * See also i915_request_is_active(). + * + * Returns true if the request has begun executing the user payload, or + * has completed: + */ +static inline bool i915_request_started(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + bool result; + + if (i915_request_signaled(rq)) + return true; + + result = true; + rcu_read_lock(); /* the HWSP may be freed at runtime */ + if (likely(!i915_request_signaled(rq))) + /* Remember: started but may have since been preempted! */ + result = __i915_request_has_started(rq); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return result; +} + +/** + * i915_request_is_running - check if the request may actually be executing + * @rq: the request + * + * Returns true if the request is currently submitted to hardware, has passed + * its start point (i.e. the context is setup and not busywaiting). Note that + * it may no longer be running by the time the function returns! + */ +static inline bool i915_request_is_running(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + bool result; + + if (!i915_request_is_active(rq)) + return false; + + rcu_read_lock(); + result = __i915_request_has_started(rq) && i915_request_is_active(rq); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return result; +} + +/** + * i915_request_is_ready - check if the request is ready for execution + * @rq: the request + * + * Upon construction, the request is instructed to wait upon various + * signals before it is ready to be executed by the HW. That is, we do + * not want to start execution and read data before it is written. In practice, + * this is controlled with a mixture of interrupts and semaphores. Once + * the submit fence is completed, the backend scheduler will place the + * request into its queue and from there submit it for execution. So we + * can detect when a request is eligible for execution (and is under control + * of the scheduler) by querying where it is in any of the scheduler's lists. + * + * Returns true if the request is ready for execution (it may be inflight), + * false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool i915_request_is_ready(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return !list_empty(&rq->sched.link); +} + +static inline bool __i915_request_is_complete(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return i915_seqno_passed(__hwsp_seqno(rq), rq->fence.seqno); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_completed(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + bool result; + + if (i915_request_signaled(rq)) + return true; + + result = true; + rcu_read_lock(); /* the HWSP may be freed at runtime */ + if (likely(!i915_request_signaled(rq))) + result = __i915_request_is_complete(rq); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return result; +} + +static inline void i915_request_mark_complete(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(rq->hwsp_seqno, /* decouple from HWSP */ + (u32 *)&rq->fence.seqno); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_has_waitboost(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_has_nopreempt(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + /* Preemption should only be disabled very rarely */ + return unlikely(test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_NOPREEMPT, &rq->fence.flags)); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_has_sentinel(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return unlikely(test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SENTINEL, &rq->fence.flags)); +} + +static inline bool i915_request_on_hold(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + return unlikely(test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD, &rq->fence.flags)); +} + +static inline void i915_request_set_hold(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline void i915_request_clear_hold(struct i915_request *rq) +{ + clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_HOLD, &rq->fence.flags); +} + +static inline struct intel_timeline * +i915_request_timeline(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + /* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */ + return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline, + lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex) || + test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &rq->context->flags)); +} + +static inline struct i915_gem_context * +i915_request_gem_context(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + /* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */ + return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->context->gem_context, true); +} + +static inline struct intel_timeline * +i915_request_active_timeline(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + /* + * When in use during submission, we are protected by a guarantee that + * the context/timeline is pinned and must remain pinned until after + * this submission. + */ + return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline, + lockdep_is_held(&rq->engine->sched_engine->lock)); +} + +static inline u32 +i915_request_active_seqno(const struct i915_request *rq) +{ + u32 hwsp_phys_base = + page_mask_bits(i915_request_active_timeline(rq)->hwsp_offset); + u32 hwsp_relative_offset = offset_in_page(rq->hwsp_seqno); + + /* + * Because of wraparound, we cannot simply take tl->hwsp_offset, + * but instead use the fact that the relative for vaddr is the + * offset as for hwsp_offset. Take the top bits from tl->hwsp_offset + * and combine them with the relative offset in rq->hwsp_seqno. + * + * As rw->hwsp_seqno is rewritten when signaled, this only works + * when the request isn't signaled yet, but at that point you + * no longer need the offset. + */ + + return hwsp_phys_base + hwsp_relative_offset; +} + +bool +i915_request_active_engine(struct i915_request *rq, + struct intel_engine_cs **active); + +void i915_request_notify_execute_cb_imm(struct i915_request *rq); + +enum i915_request_state { + I915_REQUEST_UNKNOWN = 0, + I915_REQUEST_COMPLETE, + I915_REQUEST_PENDING, + I915_REQUEST_QUEUED, + I915_REQUEST_ACTIVE, +}; + +enum i915_request_state i915_test_request_state(struct i915_request *rq); + +void i915_request_module_exit(void); +int i915_request_module_init(void); + +#endif /* I915_REQUEST_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3